Baseball>>>>cricket.
cricket got no swag, nikka. Ain't no one fukk wit cricket in a country that matters. And what you said about baseball is dead wrong.
Ask Tony Gwynn if all he was trying to do was hit it as hard as he can. Hitters try to hit it where they ain't. They aim when they hit. There's nuance to it. Don't talk about a sport you know nothing about.
Dude, baseball is a wack sport...There is pretty much only one swing of the bat in baseball...When you see a home run in baseball, the swing of one batsman looks identical to the next man's...
The game goes through an eternity of time before there is even the slightest sign that something will happen...
It's a statistics game, looking at the stats is more fun than actually watching the sport...
At least in cricket, there are a variety of ways the game is played 1) short version (25 overs) 2) Medium version (50 overs) and 3) Long version (5 day test match)...
There are various ways you can strike the ball, all kinds of foot and wrist work...A good cricketer can hit a six "home run" by just flicking his wrists...You don't need to necessarily swing with all your might...
There are various ways you can bowl, fast, medium, slow...A bowler can use the pitch and various grips of the ball to make it swing and do all kinds of things...
A good fielder can hit the wickets from far way, and catch a ball coming at him at 100 miles/hour with no gloves...Just bare hands...
Cricket has just WAY MORE STYLES than baseball...
Just like Rugby has more styles than NFL...