The NY Times

But who wouldn’t prefer modest inflation and a bit of asset erosion to mass unemployment?


Honestly its whatever at this point. Just print more money, deposit it in the accounts of the wealthy, and pretend to be helping

The NY Times

But who wouldn’t prefer modest inflation and a bit of asset erosion to mass unemployment?



The NY Times
Honestly its whatever at this point. Just print more money, deposit it in the accounts of the wealthy, and pretend to be helping![]()

Nope, just appreciating how vague they can be without any questions from their fellow liberals.


or 
Vague? It says above 2%. And of course its slanted. It's an op-ed. He says raise to 4%Nope, just appreciating how vague they can be without any questions from their fellow liberals.
Chances are the slant it's written with isnt even visible on this board.
At the end of the day all I can do is eitheror
![]()
"Vague? It says above 2%. And of course its slanted. It's an op-ed. He says raise to 4%
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/04/euphemistic-at-the-imf/
The rest can indeed be summed up by ""

