Donald Trumps Twitter
Divine Infinite Commander King
Mcnabb, McNair, Culpepper > Romo
Exactly the point I was making. Playoff record is a worthless stat in this context because nobody wants to think about how bad Dallas has been in so many aspects for the past decade.You seem to have forgotten that awful Oline(The boys use to have a dogshyt Oline compared to that wall they have now) and Defense he had for years. Blaming Romo for the Cowboys past failures is amusing. It's as bad as the people who blame McNabb for all the bad things that happened in Philly.
Lets also not forget Andy Reid >>>>> Jason Garrett

Come up off that 1st@Primetime21 Let ya Canes brother get Romo on the Phins

McNabb started 34 more games than Romo, he better have more completions, and yards.I just looked at the career stats and McNabb wins hands down. More completions, more yards passing, 3k more yards rushing , 20 more rushing TDs and better per game stats . All that with waaaaay less talent around him than Romo.
Throw in way more success and Romo being injury prone and it's not even an argument
This is just a blatant lie. McNabb played like ten more games. Also had more yards a game and they had the exact same amount of INTs with McNabb playing more gamesMcNabb started 34 more games than Romo, he better have more completions, and yards.
Even with McNabb having a 34 game advantage, Romo still has thrown for more TD passes. Romo has a better TD/INT ratio, completion percentage by a mile, YPA, and YDS/GM.
Pretty much any metric where you level the playing field based on games played Romo has the advantage in.
Miss me with McNabb having more playoff wins. McNabb had a top 10 defense SEVEN times with the Eagles. He had a top 5 defense FIVE times.
All he had to do was drive the bus.
Guess how many times Romo had a top 10 defense? Once.
9 > 5
ContextMcNabb started 34 more games than Romo, he better have more completions, and yards.
Even with McNabb having a 34 game advantage, Romo still has thrown for more TD passes. Romo has a better TD/INT ratio, completion percentage by a mile, YPA, and YDS/GM.
Pretty much any metric where you level the playing field based on games played Romo has the advantage in.
Miss me with McNabb having more playoff wins. McNabb had a top 10 defense SEVEN times with the Eagles. He had a top 5 defense FIVE times.
All he had to do was drive the bus.
Guess how many times Romo had a top 10 defense? Once.
9 > 5
This is just a blatant lie. McNabb played like ten more games. Also had more yards a game and they had the exact same amount of INTs with McNabb playing more games
http://football-players.pointafter.com/compare/17700-26746/Tony-Romo-vs-Donovan-McNabb

That is games played
I compared games started. McNabb's 161 to Romo's 127. Fukk outta here with total games played.
Romo didn't play until his 3rd year in the league, makes no sense to count games played where he didn't log a snap.

The link you posted has Romo at 155 games played. 28 of those 155 games he didn't even play in, because like I mentioned in my previous post, he didn't start until midway through his 3rd season. Which is why looking at games started is a more accurate comparison.That is games played![]()
McNabb still has better per game #s. Also are we sposed to care that Romo wasn't good enough to play and then was injured alot?The link you posted has Romo at 155 games played. 28 of those 155 games he didn't even play in, because like I mentioned in my previous post, he didn't start until midway through his 3rd season. Which is why looking at games started is a more accurate comparison.
But I see why you'd post that link since it skews the stats in McNabb's favor. Carry on.

