could be possible considering no one has gone down for the leak
How did Snowden help the US lose it rights, instead of the politicians that voted for the elimination of our rights or the government that constantly lobbies for the removal our our civil liberties.Wiki Leaks is named after Wikipedia and Snowden would have been dead or arrested in HK. I don't believe he released it to the public, he was assigned to a job to be a spokesman/face of whistleblowers all the while helping us lose our rights by pretending to be someone that was created for us.
How did Snowden help the US lose it rights, instead of the politicians that voted for the elimination of our rights or the government that constantly lobbies for the removal our our civil liberties.
US as in us. Think Tanks create the policies, not politicians. Same people who created War on Things....
Need to stay focused on who the real enemies are, that said I doubt Snowden is involvedi n the deep state seeing the US government was grounding planes of foreign dignitaries and trying to kill this man without trial and arrest him without charge all over the globe
Don't believe that....he would have been dead already.
I'm actually dumber for watching this. Wikileaks is exactly what it was and likely never changed until the owner found himself as a fugitive depending on countries to provide him safety and refuge from prosecution.Sweet youtube video, Bro!
![]()
to corroborate this, look at wikileaks prior tweets from August 2016 to December 2016... Around September-October, strange shyt started happening. their posting style started to change and they made simple mistakes in grammar and not only that, they started the "Wikileaks Task Force" twitter handle and failed to verified their PGP Key.I'm actually dumber for watching this. Wikileaks is exactly what it was and likely never changed until the owner found himself as a fugitive depending on countries to provide him safety and refuge from prosecution.
before /r/conspiracy became /r/The_Donald2.0, there was a thread on whether wikileaks was compromised or not... alot of signs pointed to yes.
Since its inception Wikileaks has slowly dripped hidden truths regarding the techno-state into the public stream, it would serve as an indirect and calculated method of revealing the global omnipresent surveillance net. In the book 1984 a large part of the surveillance, occurs in the individuals own mind where they begin to censor their thoughts, words and actions out of the fear of being watched and known.
b/c aint shyt happeningSweet youtube video, Bro!
![]()
I'm actually dumber for watching this. .
Two scenarios in my mind:
Perhaps the purpose of Wikileaks is to normalize the surveillance state in the public conscious?Since its inception Wikileaks has slowly dripped hidden truths regarding the techno-state into the public stream, it would serve as an indirect and calculated method of revealing the global omnipresent surveillance net. In the book 1984 a large part of the surveillance, occurs in the individuals own mind where they begin to censor their thoughts, words and actions out of the fear of being watched and known.
OR
Wikileaks is the real deal, and any attempts to tie it to partisian politics is a psyop to discredit the organizations work as a whole.
It isto corroborate this, look at wikileaks prior tweets from August 2016 to December 2016... Around September-October, strange shyt started happening. their posting style started to change and they made simple mistakes in grammar and not only that, they started the "Wikileaks Task Force" twitter handle and failed to verified their PGP Key.
before /r/conspiracy became /r/The_Donald2.0, there was a thread on whether wikileaks was compromised or not... alot of signs pointed to yes.
Warrant canary - Wikipedia