The Real Point of Wikileaks

[Jonah]

Facts are Trump was supporting Wikileaks before being elected and this is just buddy support. Republicans are for the Corporation side of Facism. Assange supports Corporations as in my last posts.

Just a matter of time before your eyes finally open.

http://www.businessinsider.com/wikileaks-has-joined-the-trump-administration-2017-3

 

[Vonte3000]

to corroborate this, look at wikileaks prior tweets from August 2016 to December 2016... Around September-October, strange shyt started happening. their posting style started to change and they made simple mistakes in grammar and not only that, they started the "Wikileaks Task Force" twitter handle and failed to verified their PGP Key.

before /r/conspiracy became /r/The_Donald2.0, there was a thread on whether wikileaks was compromised or not... alot of signs pointed to yes.

Warrant canary - Wikipedia

Very believable, we don't know the full extent of this governments power since they operate in the shadows, it's best to assume most things are a psyop. I have a strict policy that if something is breaking news or in the media for an extended period of time then it is either fake or a distraction or both.

 

[David_TheMan]

They only drop meaningless info that was exposed decades before. If you trust them, you might as well trust Wikipedia.

Yeah the diplomatic cables weren't meaningless info, the video that Manning brought them was excellent current info.

I hate how they abandoned Manning though and how they filtered info. I'm not a fan of Assange personally, I think he wants to be too much a famous person, but I'm not going to lie and say they haven't released info that has benefited the public from being released. Even some of their earlier work on corrupt eastern european politicians is positive.

 

[thekingsmen]

Yeah the diplomatic cables weren't meaningless info, the video that Manning brought them was excellent current info.

I hate how they abandoned Manning though and how they filtered info. I'm not a fan of Assange personally, I think he wants to be too much a famous person, but I'm not going to lie and say they haven't released info that has benefited the public from being released. Even some of their earlier work on corrupt eastern european politicians is positive.

The veterans coming back from Iraq exposed killing people years before manning video dropped.

 

[David_TheMan]

The veterans coming back from Iraq exposed killing people years before manning video dropped.

yet they were disregarded, ignored, or marginalized by the us government. When the video dropped nothing could be disputed, audio confirmed cold blooded murder. Like I said before the org leaves a lot to be desired but I cant cast them in negative light or having being counter productive

 

[kevm3]

Wiki Leaks is named after Wikipedia and Snowden would have been dead or arrested in HK. I don't believe he released it to the public, he was assigned to a job to be a spokesman/face of whistleblowers all the while helping us lose our rights by pretending to be someone that was created for us.

If it was info being released that wasn't supposed to be released, then like you said, Snowden would disappear, Wikileaks would be taken down, etc. They will take a website down for sharing music, but they won't take a website down with all kinds of secret government documents? Wikileaks and other such sites are just a way to create an easily controlled 'face' of 'alternative media'.

 

[thekingsmen]

If it was info being released that wasn't supposed to be released, then like you said, Snowden would disappear, Wikileaks would be taken down, etc. They will take a website down for sharing music, but they won't take a website down with all kinds of secret government documents? Wikileaks and other such sites are just a way to create an easily controlled 'face' of 'alternative media'.

This.