The Refs fukked us :dahell:
- Thread starter Tony D'Amato
- Start date
TheyCallMeAzul
All Star
I don't have a problem with that call. While it clearly touched Jackson, it was blatant as hell that Barnes fouled him. Sort of evens out. So while it technically wasn't "right", it was fair
So ya'll arguing bout that foul on the 3? That was even more clear.I don't have a problem with that call. While it clearly touched Jackson, it was blatant as hell that Barnes fouled him. Sort of evens out. So while it technically wasn't "right", it was fair
TheyCallMeAzul
All Star
I believe Paul was fouled twice. On the initial turnover, Russ stripped him clean, but he was fouled while the ball was loose. Then again, had he just taken the foul instead of his signature "shoot from half court to get one more FT" this thread wouldn't exist. And on the last possession,
prophecypro
Hollywood North
Man The Clips fell apart and Russy and KD just went off.
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
I think if anyone still has any doubts about the intentions of the officials in this game, how about the fact that AFTER CP got fouled and lost the ball, there was still about a second left and Chris grabbed Ibaka. The refs didnt even think about calling that standard procedure intentional foul. They were already walking off the court. By that point in their minds it was already over and they had accomplished what they set out to do.I believe Paul was fouled twice. On the initial turnover, Russ stripped him clean, but he was fouled while the ball was loose. Then again, had he just taken the foul instead of his signature "shoot from half court to get one more FT" this thread wouldn't exist. And on the last possession,
The_Unchosen_One
Superstar
Y'all forget the clear path foul at the end of the first?
Goatpoacher
Superstar
I watched the videos and made the determination for myself. I'm not presenting evidence I'm weighing evidence. I hope you understand the difference.
And here's my problem: If CP3 was called for a foul for just being around westbrook, then westbrook should have been called for a foul as well. That's not bad officiating, that's biased officiating.
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
If you don't have conclusive proof, than don't act like the opposite to your findings may be true (which you've done all throughout this thread)
Wrong.
He was called for contact on Westbrook's elbow, not 'just being around' him.
Westbrook fouled on 3-pt attempt: Paul's hand didn't make contact with the ball
Westbrook's steal on Paul: Westbroolk's hand came in contact with the ball.
They're not the same. Stop comparing the two.
At this point we can all agree that refs stay fukking up at any given time. Sometimes they fukk it up for your team, sometimes for the other team. However, until the day coaches and players refuse and reverse wrongful calls in their favor, we know nobody cares about fairness.
According to Clipper nation:
Refs fukk over okc = refs are
Refs fukk over Clippers = refs are
According to Clipper nation:
Refs fukk over okc = refs are
Refs fukk over Clippers = refs are
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
No part of Chris Paul came into contact with any part of Russell Westbrook on the play. Russ threw up another airball and was gifted the game-winning free throws. Feel free to post any evidence you have to the contrary.
On the other hand, we already have hard evidence that Chris Paul was fouled on the last play.
These only 2 examples in a string of about 6 or 7 to end the game.
Why don't the clippers boycott the next game then 
