'The Thunder don't need Westbrook's scoring' - @GoddamnyacacProf

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Your opinion is not be trusted when discussing CP0, until you can acknowledge he choked away Game 5.

 

[Goatpoacher]

May be you're retarded. Westbrook out played CP0 this series.. If CP0 was in place of Westbrook, the Thunder would have not won the series 4-2. His scoring was one of, if the not the deciding factor in this series and CP0's style of play was not. This is the premise of this thread. I won.



Yes, you're retarded. Go back to that thread and re-read the question I proposed. I NEVER once said the Nets would beat them without Lopez. You clearly can't read. You even asked me in that thread, will they beat them without Lopez and I said 'No".

I win

So let's see :JJ:

1. Profasi says CP3 for Westbrook would make the Thunder better. You lie, misquote him, and pretend like he claimed the THunder were better without Westbrook period. (Then the THunder go on a tear without Westbrook and KD secures his first MVP.)

2. You make a thread about how dangerous the Nets are against the Heat, you upped it every time the nets won in the regular season, then you hedge by saying the NEts with brook lopez would beat the heat.

I don't have a problem with number 2 except this: Why should you be allowed to have nuance when you intentionally ignore it with others? Maybe your bullshytting works on other people but you know damn well it's not sliding past me :AA: If the Nets came anywhere near beating the heat or even took them to 6 games you would have been proclaiming victory.

So give it up.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

So let's see :JJ:

1. Profasi says CP3 for Westbrook would make the Thunder better. You lie, misquote him, and pretend like he claimed the THunder were better without Westbrook period. (Then the THunder go on a tear without Westbrook and KD secures his first MVP.)

Wrong. I said better with a pass-first PG and the took it of context on purpose to give him a taste of his own medicine. You weren't in the other thread to witness the bullshyt he was pulling.

It doesn't matter now, because this series proved him wrong. I win. This is the end of it.

2. You make a thread about how dangerous the Nets are against the Heat, you upped it every time the nets won in the regular season, then you hedge by saying the NEts with brook lopez would beat the heat..

I never hedged ANYYTHING. Are you stupid? Re-read the thread

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/nets...-a-row-by-a-combined-score-of-391-339.180615/ - original post

Question/poll - Who is/was the biggest threat to the Heat?

"If they were healthy would they be the biggest threat to Miami in the East?

All starters can create their own shot, elite PG to run the floor, legitimate low-post scoring threat, high-IQ in every starting position (highest in league), '20+ PPG scorers' in backcourt and frontcourt, championship experience, arguably the best C in the league, all starters threats to score in last 5 minutes, best-ball movement in the East, best bench in the East, players that have previously been thorns in LeBron's side (Pierce, KG and Terry), one of the best closers, strength/depth in the Heat's weakest areas."

I specifically made it clear, by asking a question about who's their biggest 'threat'. The only way I could be proven wrong, would be if Lopez was healthy and the Pacers outperformed the Nets when they both played Heat, likewise I would only be proven right if Lopez was healthy and the Nets outperformed the Pacers when they both played the Heat.

I don't have a problem with number 2 except this: Why should you be allowed to have nuance when you intentionally ignore it with others? Maybe your bullshytting works on other people but you know damn well it's not sliding past me :AA: If the Nets came anywhere near beating the heat or even took them to 6 games you would have been proclaiming victory.

So give it up.

No I wouldn't. Because it was more a contest of who was better equipped to beat the Heat - the Pacers of the Nets (and the Bulls). I NEVER changed my stance with that thread, it was always if they were healthy. You just failed to read the OP properly

 

[USSInsiders]

Wrong. I said better with a pass-first PG and the took it of context on purpose to give him a taste of his own medicine. You weren't in the other thread to witness the bullshyt he was pulling.

It doesn't matter now, because this series proved him wrong. I win. This is the end of it.

I never hedged ANYYTHING. Are you stupid? Re-read the thread

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/nets...-a-row-by-a-combined-score-of-391-339.180615/ - original post

Question/poll - Who is/was the biggest threat to the Heat?

"If they were healthy would they be the biggest threat to Miami in the East?

All starters can create their own shot, elite PG to run the floor, legitimate low-post scoring threat, high-IQ in every starting position (highest in league), '20+ PPG scorers' in backcourt and frontcourt, championship experience, arguably the best C in the league, all starters threats to score in last 5 minutes, best-ball movement in the East, best bench in the East, players that have previously been thorns in LeBron's side (Pierce, KG and Terry), one of the best closers, strength/depth in the Heat's weakest areas."

I specifically made it clear, by asking a question about who's their biggest 'threat'. The only way I could be proven wrong, would be if Lopez was healthy and the Pacers outperformed the Nets when they both played Heat, likewise I would only be proven right if Lopez was healthy and the Nets outperformed the Pacers when they both played the Heat.



No I wouldn't. Because it was more a contest of who was better equipped to beat the Heat - the Pacers of the Nets (and the Bulls). I NEVER changed my stance with that thread, it was always if they were healthy. You just failed to read the OP properly

You really thought the Nets had a remote chance of beating Miami though breh?

 

[Bledswole]

You really thought the Nets had a remote chance of beating Miami though breh?

So Thunder still better without Westbrook breh?

 

[USSInsiders]

So Thunder still better without Westbrook breh?

I think they'd be just as good, but they'd play a lot differently We've all seen how great this team could be if Brooks allowed Reggie and Lamb more opportunities

 

[USSInsiders]

So Thunder still better without Westbrook breh?

@Gil Scott-Heroin Ok, so make another alias

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

You really thought the Nets had a remote chance of beating Miami though breh?

I did think they had a shot. Even without Lopez, because they had the tools to to push the Heat. The series would still be alive if Lopez was playing. Yes, some of it was blind faith in wanting a team to beat the Heat, but as I said before the series begun - gun to my head, they wouldn't beat them without a low post scorer.

 

[USSInsiders]

I did think they had a shot. Even without Lopez, because they had the tools to to push the Heat. The series would still be alive if Lopez was playing. Yes, some of it was blind faith in wanting a team to beat the Heat, but as I said before the series begun - gun to my head, they wouldn't beat them without a low post scorer.

Hindsight is always 20/20

 

[Bledswole]

I think they'd be just as good, but they'd play a lot differently We've all seen how great this team could be if Brooks allowed Reggie and Lamb more opportunities

nikka the denial you in could be life threatning you need to get that shyt checked out























Thunder 10x better with Westbrook

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Hindsight is always 20/20

At the end of the day: the thread was about - if both teams were healthy, who would push the Heat more, the Pacers or the Nets. We were never going to get a resolved answer.

 

[USSInsiders]

nikka the denial you in could be life threatning you need to get that shyt checked out























Thunder 10x better with Westbrook

I think the risk and reward is higher with him in, but they're a lot more efficient without him in my opinion. Don't have the numbers to back it up (someone actually did in one of the threads a while back) but when you have a gambler like Westbrook you better pray when he doubles down he doesn't bust n/h or else shyt is gonna get ugly.

Game 5 should've been a loss via classic impulsive Sabo pullup but CP3 pulled the miracle choke of his life out of his back pocket.

I think if Westbrook can keep the games from going down the wire they'll be okay though, he's been playing well this year though. Barely looks like he knee ever had any damage. HGH is a hell of a drug

 

[Bledswole]

I think the risk and reward is higher with him in, but they're a lot more efficient without him in my opinion. Don't have the numbers to back it up (someone actually did in one of the threads a while back) but when you have a gambler like Westbrook you better pray when he doubles down he doesn't bust n/h or else shyt is gonna get ugly.

Game 5 should've been a loss via classic impulsive Sabo pullup but CP3 pulled the miracle choke of his life out of his back pocket.

I think if Westbrook can keep the games from going down the wire they'll be okay though, he's been playing well this year though. Barely looks like he knee ever had any damage. HGH is a hell of a drug

HGH is def a hell of a drug






But if you honestly think the Thunder would have beat the Clippers with Russ out Idk wat to tell you breh,Ive seen only two Pg's fukk CP0 up and thats Derrick Rose and now Russ,Jackson isnt capable of carrying a load that heavy when its all for the money breh

Thunder get bounced first round this year without Russ breh,real shyt

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

@GoddamnyamanProf @Goatpoacher

Checkmate.

Checkmate?

Thunder won the championship and Russ got Finals MVP tonight?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Checkmate?

Thunder won the championship and Russ got Finals MVP tonight?

Westbrook's scoring was the difference, and what they needed to beat the Clippers. He kept them in the games when there was no other scoring (other than Durant).

They wouldn't have got to the line as much as they did had they had CP0 instead. OKC need that constant threat. CP0 can't provide that like Russ can.

I win.,