Wrong. I said better with a pass-first PG and the took it of context on purpose to give him a taste of his own medicine. You weren't in the other thread to witness the bullshyt he was pulling.
It doesn't matter now, because this series proved him wrong. I win. This is the end of it.
I never hedged ANYYTHING. Are you stupid? Re-read the thread
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/nets...-a-row-by-a-combined-score-of-391-339.180615/ - original post
Question/poll - Who is/was the biggest threat to the Heat?
"If they were healthy would they be the biggest threat to Miami in the East?
All starters can create their own shot,
elite PG to run the floor, legitimate low-post scoring threat, high-IQ in every starting position (highest in league), '
20+ PPG scorers' in backcourt and frontcourt, championship experience, arguably the best C in the league, all starters threats to score in last 5 minutes, best-ball movement in the East, best bench in the East, players that have previously been thorns in LeBron's side (Pierce, KG and Terry), one of the best closers, strength/depth in the Heat's weakest areas."
I specifically made it clear, by asking a question about who's their biggest 'threat'. The only way I could be proven wrong, would be if Lopez was healthy and the Pacers outperformed the Nets when they both played Heat, likewise I would only be proven right if Lopez was healthy and the Nets outperformed the Pacers when they both played the Heat.
No I wouldn't. Because it was more a contest of who was better equipped to beat the Heat - the Pacers of the Nets (and the Bulls). I NEVER changed my stance with that thread, it was always if they were healthy. You just failed to read the OP properly