The True Intent Of Indiana’s ‘Religious Freedom’ Bill, According To The People That Helped Write It
- Thread starter 88m3
- Start date
-
- Tags
- lgbt movement republican
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,072
- Reputation
- 7,977
- Daps
- 118,549
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Melbournelad said:
I was speaking specifically about 'White' people. Age is of no consequence.
Their power is being threatened and this is how they react EVERY time.
Their power is being threatened and this is how they react EVERY time.
the cac mamba
Veteran
jesus will forgive you
the cac mamba
Veteran
i will say this though: im not entirely sold on forcing a wedding business to service a gay wedding or pay a fine, because there are plenty of similar services these people could go to. and the fact is that i wish we could legislate that the bible isnt credible, or people would just wake the fukk up, but that aint happening
now im aware that the slope gets slippery as far as refusing business. catering turns into stores, etc. so in the end it wouldnt work and overall i dont agree with the bill
i also love to see christians lose so if the NCAA actually dips on indiana
now im aware that the slope gets slippery as far as refusing business. catering turns into stores, etc. so in the end it wouldnt work and overall i dont agree with the bill
i also love to see christians lose so if the NCAA actually dips on indiana
Who are "white" people though?
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,072
- Reputation
- 7,977
- Daps
- 118,549
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Melbournelad said:
You asked this question before. The answer hasn't changed.......
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited said:
Last edited:
Who exactly is being persecuted? Despite the misinformation being put out by you uneducated left wingers, nothing in this law is going to result in restaurants not serving food or stores not selling goods to gay people. Those transactions do not involve religion and that kind of denial of service is already illegal. This law specifically involves business transactions that violate a person's specific religious beliefs like gay marriage. Why should a Christian wedding planner be forced to plan a gay wedding or a Muslim photographer forced to take pictures of a gay couple when there are numerous other people willing to perform those services? You are putting an unnecessary burden on religious people that violates principles of free religion.
This manufactured outrage from the left is just political in nature. Liberals are just trying to get their base of uninformed rubes worked up and angry at conservatives. None of that people expressing outrage have any understanding of the specifics of this law. There are similar laws already on the books in 19 states as well as a federal law passed by President Clinton in 1993.
But more specifically, what are the prerequisites for someone to be classified as a "white" person?
Apparently freedom of religion is important but freedom from religion isn't at all according to these people.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Major corporations and legal scholars = liberal conspiracy
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/...aws_n_6969854.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000010
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,072
- Reputation
- 7,977
- Daps
- 118,549
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Melbournelad said:
I'm asking specifically who YOU classify as "white"? Is it just, "white skin"?
Last edited:
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,072
- Reputation
- 7,977
- Daps
- 118,549
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Melbournelad said:
Those who benefit from and perpetuate 'White'-skin privileges.
Last edited:
:hum:
I feel like you're dying to say "all white people" but it's not politically correct. Am I wrong ?