I'm not gonna speak too much on it, since I don't know what happened, and I don't wanna come off ignorant to you since I don't know you, but...IF he wrestled the gun away from the dudes, why didn't he take care of it right then? He could've mollywhopped the bul, shot him then it would be in the heat of the moment. What people are saying is that once (on camera) he walks into the room, looks around, then fires into the crowd of people, all of that feeling threatened is null and void. The situation is already over for that night. He became the initiator, he's not defending anything. Also, if these are dudes that know each other, you know that you'll see them again. Once it's over, that's the wrong place to retaliate...especially on camera...in a crowd.
Now if you or your family are people that will defend to the death or retaliate, that's cool. That's what y'all do. But what happens when you hit an innocent, because you didn't plan your hit right, and what happens when the family of that innocent now comes for you? Or you did it on camera so the justice system retaliates. There are smarter and easier ways to hit someone. Truth be told, the retaliation is BS...most people know who hit family/friends and rarely are there retaliations. f there were, there'd by waaaay more dead n!ggas out there on the streets.