Well despite your arrogant tone, there's plenty of things to question. But your questions sadly show how much you verify truth by cac standards. Its not about a fancy title or getting a stamp of approval from cac institutions. Well it shouldnt be if youre so called black.
Anyways you could always question how dark skinned people were ruling in the Americas, Asia, Africa, Europe etc... before any sight of a cac, mongloid, or so called Arab. Despite this truth and FACT, they try tonrelegate everyone, especially everyone thays dark skinned to Africa. And on another note, there are some scientists that say that only black people are 100℅ human while the rest have neanderthal DNA...
Then there's the fact that while there was a great focus on Africa by outsiders, more so was put to America. The biggest genocide/slavery happened here and I don't believe that's by coincidence. The Americas hold more resources than any other place as well..
There were ancient dread locked mummies found in South America. There's interesting things about the city of Cuzco (means Naval) in Peru as well. These are some reasons I don't buy the out of Africa theory. It seems like a way to divert the attention of people, especially black people in the Americas, from America to elsewhere. Just my 2 cents
Did Human all originate from one place?
Like, instead of Africa, humans originated in South America..
Or
Did Humans spontaneously arise all over the globe simultaneously? And still be the same species and be able to breed globally. With all the other groups of humans that arose on the other side of the planet
??
(Cause.. if they did begin in one place then Africa is the likely place. Black people in South America doesn't disprove that humans started in Africa. However old the mummy is, just imagine he or his peops traveled from Africa.. before that.
If you think all humans worldwide just came into existence separately.. they didnt.)