Then came the Conquistadors!: Why Latin America and Africa share a similar tale

[Type Username Here]

Violence is paramount to being human. It's just that their subhuman level of violence is something I equate to neandrathals. Makes sense since they battled neandrathals for dominance of Europe.

Aztecs and incas did enslave tribes and make sacrifices. But their slaves didn't pick cotton all day and they didn't give other tribes blankets laced with smallpox. They sure as hell didn't feed children to dogs and test their weapons by slicing people in half.

They only took the children of other tribes and ripped their hearts or decapitated them to appease the sun. But we don't need to bring facts in here.

We won't talk about the Japanese treatment of the Chinese. We won't talk about the Arabs and what they did. Or the Persians. Or, let's not talk about the Hindu civilizations and what they did to their surrounding communities. and the most taboo around here: let's not talk about what the Africans did to themselves.

Let's not bring facts into here.

The Europeans were the most sadistic and they were superior in their tactics and weaponry, that is the only difference.

 

[Jutt]

"It Still Goes On til today you see"

The Redskins and Indians have gotten tons of critisism for decades. The Indians have been slowly fazing out the mascot over the past few years. FSU has tons of support from the Seminole community in Florida.

 

[Type Username Here]

Do people really believe that shyt I read around here? That the entire world was peaceful until Europeans showed up in their ships or on their horses?

It's evident that the indigenous tribes in the Americas were extremely violent with one another, especially the Incas and Aztecs. The North American tribes also had battles with one another over territory.

 

[Hawaiian Punch]

And to support my argument that Europeans developed that extreme savage ways from
Neanderthals

Neanderthal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Genetic evidence suggests they are closer to non-African than African anatomically modern humans, which is probably due to interbreeding between Neanderthals and the ancestors of the Eurasians.. This is thought to have occurred between 80,000 and 50,000 years ago, shortly after (or perhaps before) the promo-Eurasians emigrated from Africa, and while they were still one population. It resulted in 1–4% of the genome of people from Eurasia having been contributed by Neanderthals.[3][4][5]

Neanderthals built dwellings using animal bones. A building was made of mammoth skulls, jaws, tusks and leg bones

Savage fukking beast that infected the world with extreme violence. So violent normal humans didn't even know how to respond to it.

 

[Hawaiian Punch]

The Europeans were the most sadistic and they were superior in their tactics and weaponry, that is the only difference.

But what a big difference it turned out to be.

 

[profound]

Do people really believe that shyt I read around here? That the entire world was peaceful until Europeans showed up in their ships or on their horses?

It's evident that the indigenous tribes in the Americas were extremely violent with one another, especially the Incas and Aztecs. The North American tribes also had battles with one another over territory.

You're so white washed you're leaving out the genocide part, nobody did that on the scale of whites, that's all you're missing.

 

[Hawaiian Punch]

And let's talk about what Africans did to themselves. It's your floor breh.

 

[theworldismine13]

Violence is paramount to being human. It's just that their subhuman level of violence is something I equate to neandrathals. Makes sense since they battled neandrathals for dominance of Europe.

Aztecs and incas did enslave tribes and make sacrifices. But their slaves didn't pick cotton all day and they didn't give other tribes blankets laced with smallpox. They sure as hell didn't feed children to dogs and test their weapons by slicing people in half.

It's the same difference

 

[Type Username Here]

You're so white washed you're leaving out the genocide part, nobody did that on the scale of whites, that's all you're missing.

Again, you don't know shyt. Go read about the indigenous populations of the America per-colonialism. Many tribes were wiped off or forced to assimilate by other tribes. Children were slaughtered and slaves taken. Women were raped.

Not on the levels of what Europeans did but it happen. It wasn't all flowers and peace pipes.

 

[Type Username Here]

And let's talk about what Africans did to themselves. It's your floor breh.

Go read a little bit about Kush and Egypt.

They must have just exchanged flowers in peace.

Stop with that romanticism shyt.

 

[Hawaiian Punch]

Go read a little bit about Kush and Egypt.

They must have just exchanged flowers in peace.

Stop with that romanticism shyt.

damn man you got me. That Neanderthal blood overpowered that argument. Hope I don't die of smallpox now

 

[The War Report]

Do people really believe that shyt I read around here? That the entire world was peaceful until Europeans showed up in their ships or on their horses?

It's evident that the indigenous tribes in the Americas were extremely violent with one another, especially the Incas and Aztecs. The North American tribes also had battles with one another over territory.

I agree. I definitely don't look at it as just Whites being savage. The whole Human race has that capacity. It's better to say that the whole human race is a piece of shyt. At least animals kill each other because of survival. Humans do things to each other for reasons beyond it.

 

[Brown_Pride]

Violence is paramount to being human. It's just that their subhuman level of violence is something I equate to neandrathals. Makes sense since they battled neandrathals for dominance of Europe.

Aztecs and incas did enslave tribes and make sacrifices. But their slaves didn't pick cotton all day and they didn't give other tribes blankets laced with smallpox. They sure as hell didn't feed children to dogs and test their weapons by slicing people in half.

meh they just went to war in order to find sacrificial victims. THey were pretty fukin violent by all accounts.

 

[Fillerguy]

Not for me. Where did you go to school if I may ask? Not the specific school but area. I'm sure it might change as you move to certain parts of the country. Here in South Florida, we spent a c*nt hair of a clock tick on it.
.

I'm from North Jersey but I can't speak for most of the people in my region. prek- 5 I went to an all nigh militant Black private school. There I learned Whites have a long history of ruining history and Blacks are God's favorite but lost children (we didnt even celebrate thanksgiving). Then I spent a few years at a all White Catholic school then an inner city school were that preached the rosy version of American history. Then finally a Jew High School where we went in depth on Native American suffering.

 

[Marvel]

nah fakkits dont try to assimilate now. You losers are 12% of the population and will stay at that number while hispanics bout to be like 30-40% in 30 years. We bout to take this bytch over. You're done

The only thing yall are taking over are the newest ways to die in the latest cartel wars. Asians are outgrowing yall now. There are no jobs for your people. There is a reason yall are running back home. The great reverse migration has already occured. Better go vote for the black man if you don't want the repubs to kick illegals of the country.

Years ago, when latinos were coming across the border in droves and having babies, the black population was still expected to be 15-16% by 2050. This doesn't even include those black latinos like Carmelo and Fabolous.

We know that yall latinos dont get along and think alike. Cubans, Mexicans, Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, etc are all different culturally, live in different parts of the country. And latinas are having babies by black men at an alarming rate. I see it here in Houston everyday.