ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
I don’t know if there’s a Hell or not but I imagine people like Thomas, @DEAD7 , @Uncle Hotep , etc are continuously reborn in c00n Paradise where they can relive their imagined glory of the Antebellum South.
Meanwhile he has done nothing tangible to help the black community while he has been running his mouth and enriching himself.
Bullshyt. But even if he was preaching self acceptance, he would push that message to black people not pander to racist cacs.
Preach "SELF acceptance" to white conservatives/racists by shytting on your brehthren brehs.
But you strike me as the same kind of Negro so I can see why his perspective would make sense to you.
THIS. The biggest clue that Sowell was on some bullshyt. Out there publishing his shyt in WND, RealClearPolitics, Townhall...who the hell was going to benefit from reading his anti-Black narratives in outlets with 95% White readership, half of whom are racist? He had to know that the sole actual outcome of his work was to make White people feel good to be exactly where they were, and yet he kept doing it. I'd love for him to come up with ONE positive outcome that ever resulted from his race commentary.Exactly if he cared about black ppl he would be pushing the message through black outlets not racist white ones.
You nailed three fantastic points in that post.I find the culture argument to be one of those issues conservatives use as a social commentary to attack certain groups in an indirect manner. Its like when those race and IQ theories prop up and these white proponents say "well East Asians have a higher IQ and we are not complaining" First as an empirical matter it is difficult to measure culture, almost all attempts contain a lot of measurement error even accounting for the fact that it is treated as a latent variable with many facets. For a guy who is intelligent as he is, Sowell uses immigrants (a group he admits is self-selected) as a comparison to native born populations. The reason they are a self-selected group is also debatable, he thinks its about drive ambition etc when there is also a lot of financial factors involved. American immigration prioritizes family reunions over skills based immigration like Canada or Australia. The option used by skilled immigrants tends to be through college education, an average family in a developing country cannot afford 4 year undergrad tuition. If you look at the figures released by the Government you will see that a lot of Indian and Chinese students for instance are over-represented in the grad students stats where schools normally give tuition waivers. The culture matters video above is more in line with Acemoglu's institutional explanation for immigrant groups settled in the West. Acemoglu's book had a fascinating blurb about how in the past Westerners attributed East Asian poverty to Confucian culture and then decades later cite it for the success of countries in those regions.
This is some stopped-clock shyt right here, I actually sortof agree with this. He is an intelligent man, and while I disagree with a lot in his economic theory it's certainly not uninformed. But the moment he steps out of economics he might as well be in the Tea Party he's so ignorant. It makes no sense to me unless he lives in an insane right-wing bubble or is just doing it to cut checks.Thomas is right about things and informed and other things he is heavily uninformed, especially outside of economics.
I don’t know if there’s a Hell or not but I imagine people like Thomas, @DEAD7 , @Uncle Hotep , etc are continuously reborn in c00n Paradise where they can relive their imagined glory of the Antebellum South.
In 1960, the homicide rate in the United States was about half what it was in the mid-1930s. Then all the wonderful legal theories came in and reduced punishments, put restrictions on the police, and expanded rights for criminals. Over the next 20 years, the homicide rate doubles.
His big issue with the Bush administration is that they weren'tBut I regard both Bush presidencies as retrogression. I think of the No Child Left Behind philosophy [in George W. Bush's administration] as utter utopian naiveté. There are children, whether in the United States or in England, who have no interest in education, who make it impossible for other children to get an education, and if they're not separated out, the other children simply will not get an education.
Yeah, with everything going on in the globe the big issue is not enough "Axis of Evil" fearmongering.The people who run Iran, I don't think they would regard it as any such tragedy if they were able to knock out half of the United States and the United States knocked out all of Iran while they were safely in some other country. You cannot deter suicide bombers, and you cannot deter the ruler of North Korea by the fact that we would kill 99 percent of the Korean people if we retaliated [so long as] he was in the 1 percent that we didn't get.
Lowbrow both sides argument if I ever saw oneI think theres a role for black conservatives, but I won't let racists define how I view him.
I enjoyed what I read and wrote of his, if nothing else but for perspective.
His big issue with the Bush administration is that they weren'tenough with regards to poor Black kids?
Complain about the Bush administration and don't say a word about multiple failed wars, hundreds of thousands dead, skyrocketing federal deficits, the disaster in Katrina, torture, illegal detention, unconstitutional surveillance and the security state, regulatory destruction, environmental destruction, and the worse recession of our lifetimes. Don't even talk about the idiocy of obsessing our schools with standardized tests.
Instead, complain that the big problem with the Bush administration was that they had too much hope for struggling children.![]()
His books are actually some of my favorites. (Econ degree, Master's in similar area).
Knowledge and Decisions is well recognized by many people as a great book, regardless of ideology. I hear good things about Basic Economics though I haven't read it. When he starts straying from econ deep into "culture is everything regardless of context" like in his Race & Culture trilogy I think he goes astray and makes basic mistakes. His global warming denialism points were the worst for me since I have a physical science background and his arguments don't even sound good in that context.
Since you are an econ major, have you read The Economists' View of the World by Steven Rhoads? Great book that emphasizes the truth of basic (micro)economics but shows where the hard utilitarian philosophy of economics is blind to some realities. It quotes Sowell and many others without passing judgment.
This is why I appreciate Roland Martin. He will give you that black platform and then the real conservatives might pop up there if they're really down to debate...anyone else is a fraud honestly.Exactly if he cared about black ppl he would be pushing the message through black outlets not racist white ones.
No, I haven't read it. I'll check it out. From the summary I've read, I'm not sure I'll agree, but I'll see what he says.
Sowell was, and always has been, in sore need of contextualized thinking.
His worldview only makes sense to people who habitually ignore anything that goes against their stagnated world-view.