There Should Be A Three Million Dollar Cap On The Amount Of Money People Can Have At One Time

[The Devil's Advocate]

Flawed arguement. People now are just getting their needs making 60k a year. If you get just needs with a higher salary than that plus extra and you feel "controlled", you're just being greedy.

i want to live life... not survive it

call me greedy

call me on my $1000 phone as a matter of fact

 

[ThaRealness]

try 100 million for starters...

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

Flawed arguement. People now are just getting their needs making 60k a year. If you get just needs with a higher salary than that plus extra and you feel "controlled", you're just being greedy.

i have yet to hear your "higher salary" plan... still waiting for that

you're raising the maximum wage... you're forcing retirement.. but you have yet to tell anyone what the MINIMUM wage will be raised to, in order for nobody to be poor

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

this also called maximum wage.... but they don't have a lifetime limit... you'd be better off with maximum wage per year... the mandatory quitting is where you got this fukked up at

A maximum wage, also often called a wage ceiling, is a legal limit on how much income an individual can earn.[1] This is a related economic concept that is complementary to the minimum wage used currently by some states to enforce minimum earnings. Both a maximum and minimum wage are methods by which wealth can be redistributed within a society.

Advocates argue that a maximum wage could limit the possibility for inflation of a currency or economy, similar to the way a minimum wage may limit deflation. If these hypotheses are true, implementing both pieces of legislation would achieve an economy with wages that cannot inflate or deflate past the point of the relative maximum/minimum wage (respectively). Accordingly, wages in the economy would hover between the maximum and minimum, and the populace would live between the two wage points. Supporters say a maximum wage could also reduce devaluation of a currency by limiting the amount any member of the populace can earn, and consequently effectively limiting the availability of currency. Economists of the monetarist school hold that this position is false; instead they believe that inflation is controlled by growth in the money supply according to the quantity theory of money, rather than through growth in actual wages

Nah, I prefer it to be a cap and I think it would be better.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

let's say I get robbed
do I file some sort of form to have me go above my cap $500

Why would you do that?

 

[ThaRealness]

I mean with a 3 mill cap, you're actually hurting the economy. Rich people who are active spenders go a long way towards stimulating industry. It's the hoarders who complicate everything. If you raise the cap to 100 mill or something like that, you can keep much of the stimulus and eliminate the hoarding.

either way, it's not an ideal solution.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

you need money to spend and invest to invent
who is doing the inventing when no one has the resources to be able to dedicate the time and money to develop something when if you go over your cap you are forced to quit making money and essentially have to wait to be able join the workforce after any sort of progress

you act like money in the bank is just under the bank's mattress waiting for you to come collect it. banks use that money. they lend it to people for mortgages, and other loans and deals.

so no money in the bank isnt just sitting in a dark room some where collecting dust and cob webs, it goes full circle into the economy. only when banks start doing shady shyt or the government gets involved is when it ruins the economy

how the hell do you create the iphone on 3 mil a lifetime while having to take pauses and breaks along the way

Who said people would have to stop trying to invent new things because they aren't getting paud? You do know that's how alot of people get started before they blow up, right? Having a hobby that they just naturally enjoy. Who said you'd be a one man party either? Pooling resources is allowed.


Having banks loan money to people for housing would be abolished because people wouldn't have to struggle. Things like unemployment offices could fulfill a real purpose and hook people up with a job at a much more if not all the way garunteed rate.

 

[Citi Trends]

Why would you do that?

well the police dont usually hand you $500 when you're robbed
so if i make 3 mil in my lifetime and cant make anymore after that and have to live off what i got if i live long enough are you going to allow me to keep working more for that money, because in a normal society you can recoup 500 but in your system im only working towards a selected sum, or am i just supposed to say fukk it?

500 doesnt seem like alot, but people take losses in money all the time. stuff goes wrong.
when said stuff goes wrong do i need to turn in some sort of document to be able to work off my loses past 3 mil or do i still have to stop after i've made 3 mil overall even though i obviously have less to live on then everyone else

if you say i can start working after i go broke(idk what you mean when you say "go under cap" you will always be under cap if you're spending money unless you have adequate savings and equity)then what was the point of me even being forcefully retired

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

nikka you got a problem with opulence?!?! If this shyt is about equality then there are far better options like revenue sharing so ppl are making a base salary but also get extra money off a percentage of the profits they help generate.

Last i checked american citizens own their own homes and lands(assuming you pay your taxes on it ), quite a few costing more than 3 million. Sure everyone could have a home that costs 3 million but if you wanna go there we could all live in homes way less than 3 million too, so why put the cap at 3 million? U still haven't answered that.

Also my point was more about the heads of huge corporations....business owners and how much profit they can see off their huge companies. IE an NBA owner, you gonna cap him out at 3 million when the team is making 300 million?

What? Better?? Stahp it. Who you know own their house and the land it sits on? You? (:...: rich ass mf)

Most people spend less than 3 mil in their lifetime so we going with 3 mil


The extra money accumlated through those type of jobs would be spent in charity, you now like it is now. nba cares, right?......or nah?

 

[Ronnie Lott]

There is no reason for any person on earth to have more than that. Once you cap, you gave to quit your job. The world would be better place.

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

well the police dont usually hand you $500 when you're robbed
so if i make 3 mil in my lifetime and cant make anymore after that and have to live off what i got if i live long enough are you going to allow me to keep working more for that money, because in a normal society you can recoup 500 but in your system im only working towards a selected sum, or am i just supposed to say fukk it?

500 doesnt seem like alot, but people take losses in money all the time. stuff goes wrong.
when said stuff goes wrong do i need to turn in some sort of document to be able to work off my loses past 3 mil or do i still have to stop after i've made 3 mil overall even though i obviously have less to live on then everyone else

if you say i can start working after i go broke(idk what you mean when you say "go under cap" you will always be under cap if you're spending money unless you have adequate savings and equity)then what was the point of me even being forcefully retired

never even thought of that... the moment you make 3 mil you are over the cap... you quit... you pay your bills for december... you're now under the cap.. you can go back to work

why wouldn't someone just never reach 3 million? constantly spending the last little bit so they never reach the cap.. 2.5 million... buy a lambo.. oops now i'm in debt and at 2.1 million... work back up to 2.8 buy a house... back down to 2 mil

 

[Citi Trends]

Who said people would have to stop trying to invent new things because they aren't getting paud? You do know that's how alot of people get started before they blow up, right? Having a hobby that they just naturally enjoy. Who said you'd be a one man party either? Pooling resources is allowed.


Having banks loan money to people for housing would be abolished because people wouldn't have to struggle. Things like unemployment offices could fulfill a real purpose and hook people up with a job at a much more if not all the way guaranteed rate.

dude
im not talking about inventing a swifter. im talking about society advancing and life saving technology.
and again you dont seem to understand people dont round up their friends and tell them to put 5 bucks in when trying to advance technology

they get loans(the bank things) and investors(the peeps with the large amounts of money)
doing it your way there would be 1000s more people with say on how a certain piece of equipment should be handled which is not efficient in any way

if the bank isnt lending you money for a house who is?
unemployment wouldnt be any better because the people who still who have to work their whole life are still going to be doing so
and what about companies? do you keep rotating out the ceo until the next person to promote to the top is the secretary and then the first ceo who comes back(because he was forced to retire at 37 and only had a couple hundred thousand to live off) takes her spot?

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

fam you not listening... your plan is out there... the thing that fukks yours up is MANDATORY RETIREMENT

you still have yet to answer the most important part of your plan... is the 3 million a total that you've made in life... or you have to retire when you have 3 million saved???

some people will make 3 million in a month.. some a year... some 15... some never

some people will make 3 million but spend 2.8 million of it living their life, WHILE making the 3... so they retire with 200k in the bank??

dude already posted the stats.. avg american barely makes 2 in his entire life... and they probably have to spend 90% just living, feeding, clothing, and working to provide for themselves and their family.. so how in the hell is 3 million gonna universally help anybody

YOU NEVER EVEN MENTIONED A RAISE OR MINIMUM WAGE HIKE... so how the hell we getting those denmark numbers unless you force that upon the business world as well.. and again... no successful business runs with a revolving door of management every 6 months.. the office wouldn't even get warm before it was already time to retire and pass it to the next dude, your same age, who has no idea about the job, cause he only been there 1.5 years his damn self




yea i can study law after i retire... but why the fukk would i do that when i got 3 million to live off... plus i'm retired and haven't done real cases in a while.. is my bar exam even still valid after that much time off

doctors are even worse... they go to school for 10-20 years... finally get a residency and bam.... retirement package... top surgeons in this world ain't working for no damn free... actually you'd work at a loss cause you still gotta supply the doctors office, equipment, staff to run the damn place




on second thought... we must be being trolled.. well played sir

You right though, my plan IS out there and I'm helping spread the word.

Mandatory retirement is one of the best parts about it, you just having some tunnel vision. The constant flow of new people being able to come in and make a fair honest living would have peopke happy. People are not happy becauae they can't fight hunger or cold weather with fists and guns, atleast not in non-violent ways.

Yes I did answer it you just didn't read it.


Of course there would be a raise, people would be getting livable wages.

The business world doesn't work like that now because of the system, it's not ment to be like that. With the new system in place though, I'ma call it Prosperity, more people coming in more frequently would only mean more networking since it wouldn't just be about maximizing profit.


Don't doctors and lawyers ususlly owe a pretty good debt after getting their degree? This scenario where they just won't know anything anymore and don't love their career beyond money just doesn't sound reasonable at all. Remember door to door doctors? That would be GOAT to be real again.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

if we arent putting this excess money thats still being generated but not given to people in banks who are we trusting to watch it and allocate it properly?
are they not telling you when and when you cant work?
are they not telling you how much you can make?
youve effectively eliminated loans and mortgages so we have to get that from the government or do you wait till you're 40 and not spend a single penny to buy a house? or are we forced to rent for the majority of our life?
since no money in savings your childs college fund would have to come from using your house as equity, which most do, but wait you cant because of the whole banks having no money thing
so we'd have to get that through the government.
this would effectively make us slaves to the government and if they ever fukk up the money the whole nation will immediately collapse in on itself because we have nothing of our own backed up

These arguements are flawed. I'll tell you why.

What would make you not trust a government that is doing everything right so everyone can live peacefully in their own beds at night with full fridges? You don't trust or like them NOW of course, because they been constantly mucking everything up.

Now answer this, since we all know the government(s) already control everything anyway, what would be the difference in that aspect? LOL

How would you save up for a home? Oh I don't know, save up like everyone does now? Homes don't start out at 3 mil. You keep ignoring that I said each person can have 3 mil cap so of course your child can have their own savings.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

So what should we limit basketball player's salary to? The NBA grossed 5 billion in 2013 and that number is gonna keep going up, but players shouldn't make as much as they can get?

Hard cap on all of em