There Should Be A Three Million Dollar Cap On The Amount Of Money People Can Have At One Time

[Field Marshall Bradley]

just going off that number you the average american already spends close to that In life

That was a bullshyt number

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

you mean i have to believe all rich people the same... as if they are the same people

you mean raising 10 employees salaries to double or triple only adds 1 dollar to the price



you mean they are grossly overpaid when they put up their own hard earned dollars to open the franchise in the first place and have to pay that loan and every other bill... and when shyt goes wrong and they are broke, the employees don't lose a single fukking dollar




you mean a heart surgeon has the same responsibility as the nikka who gives me a fade









i can't with y'all... this we are the world, help your fellow man shyt is cool... but this we all deserve everything the same cause we all the same and we all doing the same job is pure nonsense..


if all the barbers in the world died, nikkas would cut their own hair

if all the lawn people died, nikkas would cut they own grass

if all the mcdonalds workers died, you can literally hire high schoolers to do that



now tell me what would happen if all the doctors in the world died??

what would happen if all the tech guys died??

what would happen if all the scientists died??



sorry to break it to you... some jobs are more important than others

but see if you if educated people, any person could do any job.. then leave the remedial shyt to young kids and felons and shyt who need to get their experience up

You know niether of those people on a personal level so why trust either? You even said yourself you think rich people are liars about what happends with their money. I noticed what you said. Not my fault you contradict yourself.


I won't with these false equivalencies and strawmen, especially ones I already destroyed previously.

How about we make it so there is no reason to illegally make money to bring down the number of ctiminals to strictly those who want to cause problems? I suppose that's to good of an idea for you. Young kids are also capable of managing a business and inventing the next big thing. Perhaps you should think of their true potential instead of, in this current economy anyway, being stuck with dead end jobs?

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

i stopped at tribal.... cause if you think tribal people like that, are somehow filling out census reports, to even be counted in this study... then you've already fukked up


edit: no i'll be fair and read on

sitting on top of natural resources... but do they own the land??

fukk it, lets say they do... what are these natural resources bringing them?? cause if they don't want money, then what are they using things like oil and minerals used to build shyt or cure shyt for??

they sitting on a gold mine, literally, and yet can't use the gold for nothing.. and at the same time don't want any money for the gold cause they don't want money... so what the fukk?

so they deserve residence... but doesn't it take money to build that?? unless they building huts... then we go back to, so you think hut people were receiving letters from their governments, asking them how many people are in their household?

Yea, you should pay attention to full detail. I was surely going to say how no capitalist, in theory, wants to pay attention to the "tribals" until it's time to take their land, resources, women, and children.

Do they own the land??? Wow. This isn't a history thread but maybe you should read up a little more on it. Maybe you think these companies own that land because they say so?

They "don't do nothing with it" according to you. They deserve in full excellent living standards for having their land taken from them, in the name of whatever colonial party you think was in the right to do that, so hopefully you wouldn't have to go through that.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

What would the point of the 3mill cap be?

Just from this post i can tell

A) you dont earn alot of money

B) youre jealous of those that do

You don't need more than 3mil to live comfortable and pursue other interests. I can tell by your ignoring questions that you have no real retort, just here to move the goalpost.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

look at this fuking communist, you have no idea how society would be less progressive at whole if you were to implement.

tell me 1 communist country that seems to be doing well for itself. even socialist canada is starting to look real bad

I'm not a commie, copy? Take that man out your avatar, right now!

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

I'll let you think that.

Edit: Actually naaaah, what are you slow? You began the debate that viewership ISN'T a huge factor why athletes are paid tons.

You do know television costs to watch? I know what I said and that isn't it, that's what your personal reading comprehension fed you.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

I dapped you because apparently you want charity. You're pathetic and I'm done talking to you

I don't care about your daps tony toni tone, rice a ronni ass.

 

[KidJSoul]

Why should they

I'm just talking about the people who have a net worth over 20-25 billion dollars, because at that point, that can often be more money than they'll even be able to use in their life times.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

I'm just talking about the people who have a net worth over 20-25 billion dollars, because at that point, that can often be more money than they'll even be able to use in their life times.

So? Why should there money be limited? Maybe they want to pass it dowm for generations

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

You don't need more than 3mil to live comfortable and pursue other interests. I can tell by your ignoring questions that you have no real retort, just here to move the goalpost.

Wtf are you talkimg about? Some people dont just want to live comfortable and survive, some of us want more

 

[KidJSoul]

So? Why should there money be limited? Maybe they want to pass it dowm for generations

I mean a certain percent.

Like maybe 1% of it.

And I mean, when they pass it down to generations, the money will probably grow in the bank anyway, so they are really not losing much money.

 

[Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha]

I mean a certain percent.

Like maybe 1% of it.

And I mean, when they pass it down to generations, the money will probably grow in the bank anyway, so they are really not losing much money.

But why should they be limited? For what reason? Its not harming anyone but the jealous people

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

You're just ignoring all the different realities of the situation to favor your arguement. Everyone not having to do the same thing is a great part about it, they can do what they'd like to do in society without worrying about starving. Only 40-50k isn't accurate either, just some numbers from a study that doesn't take all things into account.

Everyone doesn't have the privelage of going to college, you keep ignoring that. Alot of those who do go also know there is no way their major will make any money, what about them? Capitalism has to go. You want to force people to go through what you did to determine if they are "worthy". That will never be right in my eyes.

which is why instead of giving them money, i'd rather give them an education... and with the influx of people going to school, more school will need to be built, more teachers, more jobs

"Broke" should only represent things that need fixing, not how much money someone doesn't have. That research you gave is flawed. The only thing that should exist is, people who make more, people who make less, and people who live outside of modern society. Your whole grievance lies with the possibility that many generations will never have to go through the things you did to be happy. Crabs in a barrel mentality.

the research i gave was simple numbers... math has no flaws.. there is not enough money in the world to pay for everyone to have more than 10k a piece... there is not enough money in the us for all it's citizens to have more than 31k a piece... which happens to be lower than the average already is now...

what you keep failing to admit, is that i am still here, thinking up new ways to generate jobs, money and most important, KNOWLEDGE... you want to ignore all that and PRETEND i'm trying to be a crab... when really i'm in the barrel not only trying to push others out... BUT TEACHING THEM HOW TO NOT GET CAUGHT IN ANOTHER TRAP (go broke again)

You know niether of those people on a personal level so why trust either? You even said yourself you think rich people are liars about what happends with their money. I noticed what you said. Not my fault you contradict yourself.


I won't with these false equivalencies and strawmen, especially ones I already destroyed previously.

How about we make it so there is no reason to illegally make money to bring down the number of ctiminals to strictly those who want to cause problems? I suppose that's to good of an idea for you. Young kids are also capable of managing a business and inventing the next big thing. Perhaps you should think of their true potential instead of, in this current economy anyway, being stuck with dead end jobs?

again.... are all black people the same??? so if i don't believe 100 black people, that means i don't trust them all??? i said i don't believe rich people who say they live like they are poor.. simply because even if they fly coach or drive a civic... they still pay their lawyer more than my yearly salary and still stay in hotels that 1 night is more than my rent... poor people don't do that.. therefore they ain't living like they are poor


what does that have to do with... again.... simple math.. that if one store is paying their employees $7 and another store is paying them $20... that one store would have lower profits and/or higher prices on products... again simple math and simple economics.. and really i don't even have to believe them... i can google a menu from mcdonalds in denmark... it's 2014 homie

Yea, you should pay attention to full detail. I was surely going to say how no capitalist, in theory, wants to pay attention to the "tribals" until it's time to take their land, resources, women, and children.

Do they own the land??? Wow. This isn't a history thread but maybe you should read up a little more on it. Maybe you think these companies own that land because they say so?

They "don't do nothing with it" according to you. They deserve in full excellent living standards for having their land taken from them, in the name of whatever colonial party you think was in the right to do that, so hopefully you wouldn't have to go through that.

me and dude was having a convo about how there wasn't enough money

he said "well what about people who don't want money.. tribal people who don't use currency"

to which i replied, they weren't counted in the census anyway.. so if we added all those tribal people, the number would be higher than 7 billion




then we spoke of people living on top of natural resources... well what's that? besides water (to drink), animals (to eat), plants (eat, medicine).... what in the hell are they using oil for?? we gotta ride horses cause they sitting on oil not doing nothing with it.. we don't have computers or a lot of other tech that uses things like gold tips, silver, aluminum, etc etc... shyt of the periodic table, cause somebody chillin on it, but also not using it??

i would NEVER say kick them off that land and use it.. my point was, if they don't want money in exchange of it, then what exactly would these tribe people be asking for?


read the context of the convo before blindly commenting on things




yes kids can do more and invent things... i said nothing that would prevent them from doing so. what i said was they CAN work these remedial jobs... if you can do better, do better... instead of you, who would like to cap that 14 year old who invent a way to drive a car on water... while the world is making billions of cars he invented.. he made his 3 mil at 14 and will most likely blow that shyt (being 14 and all) by 30 and still have to work... meanwhile driving his invention to his job mcdonalds








again.. stance never changed since my first post... there ain't enough money to do this... some people catch a raw deal, i feel sorry for them... but some people just don't give a fukk until there life ain't working out right... i don't see how rewarding them with free money, helps that... i think that educating them, then allowing them to EARN more money, would help them AND THEIR KIDS... nothing better than a positive role model to follow

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

http://www.erietvnews.com/story/27404509/civil-rights-activist-im-done-with-shanesha-taylor

Civil rights activist: I'm done with Shanesha Taylor
Posted: Nov 17, 2014 11:03 AM EST Updated: Nov 17, 2014 11:03 AM EST Karen Brown
Phoenix, AZ -- Prosecutors have taken back their deal. Some supporters want their money returned. Her private lawyers have quit. Now the civil rights activist who stood by Shanesha Taylor says he has had enough.

Civil rights activist Rev. Jarrett Maupin, who once led the charge to support Taylor, says he's done.

He says, after helping to broker the deal of a lifetime with Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery, where there would be no charges if she attended drug and parenting classes and put some of the money donated to her in a trust for her children, Taylor has "no follow-through so our hopes turned into nightmares."

Maupin said he lined up numerous job interviews for Taylor in the hotel, restaurant and retail industries and she never showed.

"She didn't go to the interviews, didn't return calls, wasn't interested in the kind of jobs we were able to bring to the table for her," he said. "This was someone who had no job at all."

Taylor once again faces charges for leaving her kids in a hot car after saying she wouldn't spend $40,000 of the more than $100,000 she received in support money on her kids.

"The money is gone," Maupin said. "It's been spent. It's been wasted on designer clothes, Michael Kors."

"We want to see the bank statements because we see her in designer jeans, and we understand that she paid for studio time for her baby daddy's rap career," he continued. "I am flabbergasted by that."

Maupin says they have reports that Taylor spent $6,000 on studio time for the father of her children. He believes that the once-estranged father came back only after Taylor had the donated money.

Maupin says he couldn't be more disappointed in Taylor.

"I just hope we haven't spoiled that goodwill throughout the country because there is going to be someone else that is going to need help," he said.

Taylor was assigned a public defender after her lawyers quit earlier this week.

Her trial is scheduled for Dec. 10.

KTVK

i can see this happening with at least a whole fukking lot

give uneducated people free money brehs

don't give free education and let them learn on their on brehs

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Quite possibly the worst idea I've heard this year.