There's A Difference Between The GOAT And YOUR GOAT

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,797
Daps
76,716
Reppin
NULL
Are you slow? This is one of the dumbest sports take i've read.

Going by your logic losing in the first round is better than making the finals and not winning. :dead:

We play the game to win....not to lose better :gucci:

I can't wait to this fukkin nikka retire. His failures got all of yall talking stupid. Imagine telling Eagles fans in the 2000s after multiple NFC Championship losses, Superbowl losses and being the laughing stock of the NFC East that at least we went to the playoffs. Imagine saying that bullshyt :gucci: Imagine telling Eagles fans right now today that it's all good that our season collapsed and we got blown out by garbage ass Tampa Bay because at least we were in the playoffs unlike other teams. Don't nobody care about that shyt :gucci:
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
15,848
Reputation
7,044
Daps
49,031
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
Your logic doesn't make sense. With this logic, Joe Burrow is a better QB than Josh Allen because he made the Superbowl. In the real world, most people put them on the same exact playing field. You don't get brownie points for losing.
Not a 1:1 comparison. People consider Burrow and Allen on the same page because Allen is more physically gifted and durable. Allen has the stronger arm and is in the playoffs every year ..

Burrow has been hurt 2 of his 4 seasons. In his 2 healthy years, he took Cincinnati to the Super Bowl, beating Mahomes in Arrowhead, and the next season losing the AFC Championship to KC on a late field goal...

Nobody calls Burrow or the Bengals "failures" for losing to the Super Team Rams or Kansas City. Hell, mf's don't even really call the Bills losers...

Allen is 0-3 vs Mahomes in the postseason, 0-2 at Arrowhead. And he's 0-1 vs Burrow, lost that game in Buffalo and lost it bad, he didn't look like he belonged on the same field as Burrow who is just more poised and clutch than Allen...

You always get more praise for advancing deeper in the playoffs. Nobody looks at losing later in the playoffs as being a "loser", except the logic yall apply to LeBron...

And losing late in the playoffs is held against the responsible parties for the loss. Hurts arguably outplayed Mahomes last year, he had a crucial fumble late and people still don't blame him for the loss...

Yall only do this shyt with LeBron...
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
27,504
Reputation
3,073
Daps
78,517
Your logic doesn't make sense. With this logic, Joe Burrow is a better QB than Josh Allen because he made the Superbowl. In the real world, most people put them on the same exact playing field. You don't get brownie points for losing.

For one, winning isn't the only determinant of how people are ranked. Otherwise Eli Manning would be ranked much higher and Terry Bradshaw would have been in the GOAT discussion for decades and would have been the GOAT until Montana came along.

Number 2, a lot of people do rate Burrow higher than Allen, particularly those people who discuss winning as a huge criterion for ranking. The Bengals have beaten the Chiefs and the Bills in the playoffs. The Bills have done neither. I'm not sure where you're looking for your information.

And I'm not saying people should get brownie points for losing. I'm saying they should get brownie points for winning. Ie. Winning a game to get to the championship. Did you know it counts as a win when you score more than the other team does? Did you know you can win games even if it's not the championship game?
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
27,504
Reputation
3,073
Daps
78,517
We play the game to win....not to lose better :gucci:

I can't wait to this fukkin nikka retire. His failures got all of yall talking stupid. Imagine telling Eagles fans in the 2000s after multiple NFC Championship losses, Superbowl losses and being the laughing stock of the NFC East that at least we went to the playoffs. Imagine saying that bullshyt :gucci: Imagine telling Eagles fans right now today that it's all good that our season collapsed and we got blown out by garbage ass Tampa Bay because at least we were in the playoffs unlike other teams. Don't nobody care about that shyt :gucci:

That's not what he's saying.

He's saying it's stupid to criticize someone for losing in the finals but not criticize someone for losing earlier in the playoffs.

"Tim is better than Tom because Tim is 8-0 in the finals and Tom is 8-2 in the finals"

How does that make any sense?

People used to say that about Montana in favour of Brady.

"Joe never lost in the Super Bowl, Tom has" back when Joe was 4-0 and Tom was 4-2. Idiocy.
 

Jerz-2

GOATs Status
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
15,352
Reputation
5,144
Daps
56,685
I don't get involved in these Jordan vs whoever conversations anymore because not much I'm going to say that will convince someone who, imo, is blind to how great Jordan was that he's GOAT. I will say that it's wild that all these years after he retired, ESPN can do a poll where all ages have him as GOAT by a vast margin. This despite Lebron having entire PR teams in the league, media, etc while Jordan just stays silent (hint: If you have to call yourself GOAT it's a huge red flag). Mike said he cringed when people called him GOAT, Lebron "that one right there......"

As someone who has watched the sport for almost 30 years, looked at it's history, etc. there just isn't anyone else who is on that tier. I've seen Jordans entire 90s career, Kobe, Lebron, etc. and plenty of 80s games. Also, looked at careers in the 70s and before.

The great thing is that even younger people who didn't watch him play have EYES. You can't look at this as an objective fan of the sport and point me to any singular player that could do all of this on the court - the defense, the mid range, trick shots, insane finishes, layup package, clutch, dunks over anyone, hops, exciting and did it all on the highest stages where his production went UP.



Can't point me to the player that had to go through grueling defenses like the 90s Pistons, Knicks teams that would straight batter you when you went into the lane. People that haven't played, or don't REALLY understand basketball don't get what constant physical punishment takes out of you. Not only from a physical standpoint, but mentally if you get rocked a few times you're going to be hesitant to go inside. It's not about defensive schemes, xs and os or any of that. It's about will to take it every time when you know you're going to get hard. Over and over and over. You can finesse all you want, but you're going to hesitate eventually if you're getting battered if you don't have the mettle. Just look at this:



A lot of these could cause serious injury, yet:

82 games 6x
80 games 9x

Still persevered. Still got his.

Jordan never lost 3 games in a row from 90-98. I mean, that alone is insane.

No one is ever going to be in 100% agreement on anything. There will always be detractors, especially on a conversation like this. But I'm comfortable enough that the facts clearly speak to him being GOAT and it's not really a conversation actually. Most people from casuals to hardcore fans understand that. Hell just look at his reception here:



Still the star of stars in basketball. You may not like it, but it is what it is.

I'll also clear up a myth about people who have Jordan as GOAT - somehow we're tied to the man himself. No, I'm tied to what he did on the COURT that was insane and we've never seen anything match it before or since. I WANT someone to come along and be better than that. If and when it happens, I'll gladly admit it because holy shyt what a player that would be! Would love to see that again in my lifetime. Not going to give it the undeserving though. You might have to actually be an alien to surpass Michael Jordan as a basketball player.

Finally, people should really be more like this lady. She has her favorite player but recognizes reality. Too many are delusional because they hate Mike or want their favorite to be GOAT. These people are flat earthers to me.


:salute:
 

Treblemaka

President, BYNKRadio.com (Retired)
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
7,312
Reputation
4,296
Daps
59,985
Reppin
Black Empowerment
MJ’s play on the court might have something to do with it, don’t you think:jbhmm:both the NBA and Nike rode MJ’s back to unprecedented prominence. To this day they are still chasing that high

Converse had both Larry Bird and Magic wearing there Sneakers and those two helped saved the league. Either one alone but definitely both combined were bigger names with more accomplished during the 80s when Jordan came in the league and signed with Nike. The difference is Converse didn't need those two to be a successful company at the time, but Nike absolutely did need Jordan to appear as godlike as possible to be viable. When a company NEEDs an Athlete the way they market him is different.

Shoe culture is what it is today because of how Nike marketed Jordan, not Jordan himself. Whether it was giving him a unique signature shoe, making it black and red on purpose, showing an ad of him every 15 minutes, giving him his own logo and plastering it all over the place, or eventually under producing shoes to create scarcity, none of that has as much to do with his on court play and more to do how Nike marketed him and did as much as possible to Shine a light on him.

To say that Lebron has more PR than Jordan did means someone wasn't alive to see how he was marketed when he played.
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
13,159
Reputation
-375
Daps
22,697
Not a 1:1 comparison. People consider Burrow and Allen on the same page because Allen is more physically gifted and durable. Allen has the stronger arm and is in the playoffs every year ..

Burrow has been hurt 2 of his 4 seasons. In his 2 healthy years, he took Cincinnati to the Super Bowl, beating Mahomes in Arrowhead, and the next season losing the AFC Championship to KC on a late field goal...

Nobody calls Burrow or the Bengals "failures" for losing to the Super Team Rams or Kansas City. Hell, mf's don't even really call the Bills losers...

Allen is 0-3 vs Mahomes in the postseason, 0-2 at Arrowhead. And he's 0-1 vs Burrow, lost that game in Buffalo and lost it bad, he didn't look like he belonged on the same field as Burrow who is just more poised and clutch than Allen...

You always get more praise for advancing deeper in the playoffs. Nobody looks at losing later in the playoffs as being a "loser", except the logic yall apply to LeBron...

And losing late in the playoffs is held against the responsible parties for the loss. Hurts arguably outplayed Mahomes last year, he had a crucial fumble late and people still don't blame him for the loss...

Yall only do this shyt with LeBron...
There is a reason why you keep using “late in the playoffs” instead of the Super Bowl/Finals , being disingenuous is a Bron stan tactic.

If Allen was 0-3 against Mahomes in the Super Bowl games then he would be looked at as a failure. The greatest players are supposed to win the majority of the titles especially if they get there multiple times.
 

broller

Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
27,504
Reputation
3,073
Daps
78,517
There is a reason why you keep using “late in the playoffs” instead of the Super Bowl/Finals , being disingenuous is a Bron stan tactic.

If Allen was 0-3 against Mahomes in the Super Bowl games then he would be looked at as a failure. The greatest players are supposed to win the majority of the titles especially if they get there multiple times.

I'm not talking about LeBron. It's disturbing mans here keep bringing up Bron stanning when I haven't even brought up Bron. Bron isn't 6-1 in the finals so I don't see why you think I'm arguing for Bron.
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
13,159
Reputation
-375
Daps
22,697
Converse had both Larry Bird and Magic wearing there Sneakers and those two helped saved the league. Either one alone but definitely both combined were bigger names with more accomplished during the 80s when Jordan came in the league and signed with Nike. The difference is Converse didn't need those two to be a successful company at the time, but Nike absolutely did need Jordan to appear as godlike as possible to be viable. When a company NEEDs an Athlete the way they market him is different.

Shoe culture is what it is today because of how Nike marketed Jordan, not Jordan himself. Whether it was giving him a unique signature shoe, making it black and red on purpose, showing an ad of him every 15 minutes, giving him his own logo and plastering it all over the place, or eventually under producing shoes to create scarcity, none of that has as much to do with his on court play and more to do how Nike marketed him and did as much as possible to Shine a light on him.

To say that Lebron has more PR than Jordan did means someone wasn't alive to see how he was marketed when he played.
So why Nike can’t replicate how they marketed MJ to this day since it has “nothing” to do with his on court play?

You sound like a hater :hubie:
 

Treblemaka

President, BYNKRadio.com (Retired)
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
7,312
Reputation
4,296
Daps
59,985
Reppin
Black Empowerment
So why Nike can’t replicate how they marketed MJ to this day since it has “nothing” to do with his on court play?

You sound like a hater :hubie:

It's not that Nike can't it's that Nike won't.

Part of the reason I brought up Converse in the 80s is because that's where Nike is now: Dominant with the largest Market share of any athletic company in the sport. And they sign players now the same way Converse did in the 80s. Nike is bigger than any Athlete they could sign now and that swoosh is more recognized than any athlete on the planet. They don't need to spend the capital because they aren't depending on an athlete for viability now the way they were with Jordan. That's part of the reason they gave him the deal they did and Michael's agent convinced him to sign with Nike.

If you think Bron has more PR than Jordan did I need you to show me who, how, and why. Because I can definitely show you the vice versa.

I actually think Jordan is the most accomplished player in the history of the NBA. Pointing out facts that don't suit your narrative isn't a hater, it's just unbiased analysis.
 
Last edited:

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
13,159
Reputation
-375
Daps
22,697
It's not that Nike can't it's that Nike won't.

Part of the reason I brought up Converse in the 80s is because that's where Nike is now: Dominant with the largest Market share of any athletic company in the sport. And they sign players now the same way Converse did in the 80s. Nike is bigger than any Athlete they could sign now and that swoosh is more recognized than any athlete on the planet. They don't need to spend the capital because they aren't depending on an athlete for viability now the way they were with Jordan. That's part of the reason they gave him the deal they did and Michael's agent convinced him to sign with Nike.

If you think Bron has more PR than Jordan did I need you to show me who, how, and why. Because I can definitely show you the vice versa.

I actually think Jordan is the most accomplished player in the history of the NBA. Pointing out facts that don't suit your narrative isn't a hater, it's just unbiased analysis.
So if Nike is now where Converse was in the 80s, why doesn’t another shoe company like Adidas, Under Armor etc… run the so called “Nike marketing playbook that they used to prop a random good player like MJ” to prominence and unprecedented success?

Nike is not the only shoe company signing athletes so where are the “next MJs at?” I wonder if the same thing happened to Michael Jackson too where they just marketed him as the greatest performer and the “king of pop” and the masses just ate it up :jbhmm:
 
Top