Absolutely.Good video. The pace and style had drastically changed since the 90’s but people don’t want to acknowledge that.
There will always be stars because there will always be elite/charismatic players.nba need to go away from this star driven system. i feel like the good teams with good coaches and good systems can win with or without their star. Thunder, Celtics, Nuggets, spurs, and Pistons all missed major players and stilll put out a good product this year.
I know we want to see the star shine but ultimately we want our team to win.
Take one aspect of the game and avoid others. Even threes have a reaction because players now have to close out 5-8 extra feet which means they run more. There are way more perimeter screens which means more contact. Some of the greatest coaches ever never played at a high level so the notion you need to have played to analyze is nonsenseCac in this video doesn't look like he ever played an organized sport or even picked up a basketball but talking like he know more than hall of fame players. Basketball is much less physical today then in the past. Shooting 3's is easier than driving to the lane.
Angelo Dundee never won a boxing match in his life.Cac in this video doesn't look like he ever played an organized sport or even picked up a basketball but talking like he know more than hall of fame players. Basketball is much less physical today then in the past. Shooting 3's is easier than driving to the lane.
Take one aspect of the game and avoid others. Even threes have a reaction because players now have to close out 5-8 extra feet which means they run more. There are way more perimeter screens which means more contact. Some of the greatest coaches ever never played at a high level so the notion you need to have played to analyze is nonsense
Angelo Dundee never won a boxing match in his life.
Pretty sure he knew more about that sport than probably any boxer alive right now.
You don’t have to play a sport to understand it.
You can analyze all you want. What you can't do is discredit the experience of people who have actually done what you are trying to analyze. If you never dunked a basketball, you cannot tell me what its like or how difficult it is to dunk a basketball. You can describe it. you can analyze it. But you cant tell me what dunk is harder to do cause I'm the one doing the dunking. As someone who has played ball at a high level, I'm telling you driving to the lane was always more dangerous and risky for injury over shooting a 3 pointer and playing the perimeter.
And until you have stepped on a court with D1 talent or NBA talent nothing can prepare you for the speed and pace of the game. It looks slow on tv and from the sidelines. There is no amount of data that does it justice for when you are on the court. Trainers and coaches can speak as trainers and coaches.. They cannot speak FOR players or as players.
We can absolutely discredit the experience of some players because doing something doesn’t always mean you understand it on a deeper level.You can analyze all you want. What you can't do is discredit the experience of people who have actually done what you are trying to analyze. If you never dunked a basketball, you cannot tell me what its like or how difficult it is to dunk a basketball. You can describe it. you can analyze it. But you cant tell me what dunk is harder to do cause I'm the one doing the dunking. As someone who has played ball at a high level, I'm telling you driving to the lane was always more dangerous and risky for injury over shooting a 3 pointer and playing the perimeter.
And until you have stepped on a court with D1 talent or NBA talent nothing can prepare you for the speed and pace of the game. It looks slow on tv and from the sidelines. There is no amount of data that does it justice for when you are on the court.
Well using your example, how can a player that played in past eras truly analyze this era if he hasn’t played in this era at a high level. See how dumb that soundsYou can analyze all you want. What you can't do is discredit the experience of people who have actually done what you are trying to analyze. If you never dunked a basketball, you cannot tell me what its like or how difficult it is to dunk a basketball. You can describe it. you can analyze it. But you cant tell me what dunk is harder to do cause I'm the one doing the dunking. As someone who has played ball at a high level, I'm telling you driving to the lane was always more dangerous and risky for injury over shooting a 3 pointer and playing the perimeter.
And until you have stepped on a court with D1 talent or NBA talent nothing can prepare you for the speed and pace of the game. It looks slow on tv and from the sidelines. There is no amount of data that does it justice for when you are on the court. Trainers and coaches can speak as trainers and coaches.. They cannot speak FOR players or as players.
To even piggy back on this, my homeboy got a scholarship in football to play for Ohio State, I had never seen this man watch a game of football. He legit played off full instinct and could not tell you in depth what goes on in a game.Plenty of dudes who have played have podcasts. And suck at explaining/analyzing hoops