This is such a dumb question that it's actually smart

[MalickSyXShabbaz]

Conventional evolutionary logic tells us that life began as the result of proto enzymes which created basic life forms (like rna and dna) That eventually replicated...through this process of replication, mutations began to appear...some of these mutations being advantageous forged on due to natural selection....this process was supposedly expedited bythe evolution of sexual contact and sexual selection...so per evolutionary occultism this process eventually led to the multitude of traits variations and creatures that we have today


I think this is a Load of horseshyt


But assuming it's true. ..why is that just one chemical process led to "evolution" so to speak...why is it that the other chemical and physical processes that dictate existence never "evolved" and passed on their advantageous traits

Why does rain still rain?
Why do mountains still mountains?
When is gravity gonna evolve to become conscious of a bunch of cac daredevils and kill them more efficiently ?

Think about it my g

@Take It In Blood @Mowgli @Karbaash @String Bell @Rose Gold

 

[MalickSyXShabbaz]

@Benefited

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

**DELETE**​

 

[MalickSyXShabbaz]

If you really think about it, that entire theory doesn't hold water since, mathematically, it'd take about 4 billion years for those chemicals to 'create' an earthworm.

Anything more complicated, say, human beings, would take substantially longer than the Earth has existed.

But, alas, it is all that we have been able to come up with thus far so that's what gets taught in schools.​

Facts

I'm just amazed that they are willing to ascribe such an advanced likelihood to human beings but not to a rock


Why did rocks stop evolving b

 

[TRUEST]

like an apple tree apples, the earth peoples,

 

[Max Headroom]

I can't understand this shyt, I feel slow

 

[mortuus est]

good wavy brown almond hair

 

[Benefited]

@Benefited

They actually do say rocks evolve too.

Problem with the theory of evolution is it violates the second law of thermodynamics that they came up with
Not to mention the big bang theory violates the first

"The second law of thermodynamics is one of the most fundamental laws of nature, having profound implications. In essence, it says this:

The second law - The level of disorder in the universe is steadily increasing. Systems tend to move from ordered behavior to more random behavior"

 

[horizon]

Wow g you broke physics with this one

Wow

Wow

 

[MalickSyXShabbaz]

Wow g you broke physics with this one

Wow

Wow

Wow
Just
Wow

 

[horizon]

Wow
Just
Wow

Wow

 

[Dorian Breh]

The will to life is orders of magnitude stronger in living things than in inanimate objects. I guess they’d pursue their own adaptation more aggressively, with human beings (the highest manifestation of the will to life) being the best at evolving

Or some shyt

 

[MalickSyXShabbaz]

The will to life is orders of magnitude stronger in living things than in inanimate objects. I guess they’d pursue their own adaptation more aggressively, with human beings (the highest manifestation of the will to life) being the best at evolving

Or some shyt

What is life though?

Per evolutionary occultism there is no difference between a rock this cell phone and our lives

So when will this Cell phone start evolving

 

[Dorian Breh]

What is life though?

Per evolutionary occultism there is no difference between a rock this cell phone and our lives

So when will this Cell phone start evolving

Think of all creation as a manifestation of Nature’s will to create life. All things sprung from nothing (even non living aspects of nature), but the momentum with which they came into existence varied. The will to life represented by living things and contained in them is far, far greater than that contained in rocks, water, etc. The higher representations more aggressively pursue their own proliferation (because Nature gave them the tools) even on a cellular level, they are tasked with one thing only; how to continue their own species. The highest representation of this is human beings, who can adapt themselves at will to most environmental changes through the power of higher order Reasoning, even before evolution steps in to help them. Compared to this, a rock’s desire to continue the existence of rocks is so small as to be non-existent. Rocks along a river’s banks won’t adapt to become water resistant, you feel me?

Bit philosophical, but I think it’s beautiful

 

[Henri Christophe]

My weed aint potent enough to understand what u sayin breh.... Maybe I need some sleep.