This Is The Guy Going Against Nancy Pelosi

Pretty interesting
Hope she gets displaced.
Dude gonna have to let go of that samurai look, its America & unfortunately facades matter.

He could have gone deeper though

 

The Hill?

 

Whats wrong with the hill?
I watch the hill because they can keep it impartial & thats what i look for in news sources.

 

...is Rising?

 

lets see, they were writing 'fake news' articles about this Biden Ukraine shenanigans to put the battery on Trump's back so he can run with it, and here we are

 

Another terrible thread by OP.

 

The Hill is a respectable outlet. Editorials and Opinion pieces excluded of course.

With that said, Pelosi has been crushing it and has been playing chess out here so I hope she stays in office

 

The Hill doesn't keep it impartial.

You're confusing inconsistency with impartiality. The Hill has a lot of different writers that have biases all over the map. That just means in any particular piece you don't know what the bias will be, not that you know it will be impartial.

The Beltway Rot Of "The Hill," DC's Dodgiest Newspaper

If you only include the straight news and not opinion/editorial work, then you could say Hill journalists maintain journalistic integrity to about the same degree as the vast majority of mainstream journalists, although they do publish a lot more gossipy and agenda-driven backroom DC shyt that wouldn't quality as news in most papers.

 

All that said, it's fukk Pelosi and I hope she does get knocked out of office. And it could even help the Dems at large as she is one of the MAIN people the Republicans love to run against every election no matter where in the country they are. Without Clinton and Pelosi to aim at how will they even make campaign ads?

 

I still would have preferred Clinton as president.

The Right will just make more boogeymen.

Look at former elected officials Obama, Clinton, Kerry, Biden, etc

Currently elected: “The Squad”, Schiff, Nadler, etc

Unelected: Soros, “deep state”, “never Trump”, everyone on the left are “socialists”, minorities at large, Chalupa lady, foreigners/immigrants, science, data, math, books, and on and on

None of it is grounded in reality

 

Obama attacks obviously carried weight with a certain contingency and fukk them, but his unfavorable ratings never reached 50% and are currently somewhere around 35%. Kerry and Biden never moved the needle for anyone, and no one except the rabid base give a shyt about Schiff or Nadler attacks now. Conservative media treats AOC like some sort of banshee demon, but that still has only led to a 36% unfavorable rating nationally. And even many of the ones who do dislike her don't believe she represents the party. Meanwhile, Pelosi has a 50% unfavorable rating and Clinton is pegging at 61% unfavorable, and both of those are seen as the Democratic Party's standard bearers.

Just look at how much they are included in ads. There are races where Republicans mention Pelosi more than they mention the candidate they're actually running against.

I'm not saying that Pelosi is some sort of terrible leader (leave that for another discussion), I'm just saying that I don't think her getting primaryed would hurt the party in November and could even help it.

 

Shahid seems like a good guy:

 

Pelosi is cool

Some of y'all niqqas just like typing. Everything has to be some kind of hot take edgy opinion.

You don't know shyt. Listen to adults talk instead of trying to form a half baked ass opinion about everything you hear.

 

Why not just watch the interview first? It's very straightforward and has nothing anything can say is bias one way or another.

 

I wasn't complaining about the interview, like I said in the other comment I support him taking on Pelosi. I was only commenting on the claim that The Hill keeps things impartial.