This is what the night sky on mars looks like

Micky Mikey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
16,737
Reputation
3,374
Daps
95,180
Mars doesn't have much atmospheric interference like clouds and pollution. Imagine how different humanity would be if we looked into the night sky and saw all of this since our inception. Being reminded of the vastness of space of this magnitude, you couldnt help but feel small and yet more in touch with the universe. Would we still be waging all these wars and fighting over petty differences?
 

Jaguar93

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Messages
17,040
Reputation
4,792
Daps
82,697
maxresdefault.jpg
 

trapnerd

All Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Messages
849
Reputation
163
Daps
5,183
Logically thinking, “space” should appear the same if you viewed it from Earth or Mars..

Sure the view of the planets in our solar system would change if you hopped planets… but all the other stars / galaxies / planets are so far away from our solar system, that moving from earth to mars would have a negligible impact on viewing.
 

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
20,705
Reputation
3,430
Daps
107,558
It was proved that it was a heavy edited image.

"The landscape around Perseverance is real, and the sky is real, but it’s an Earth sky, not a Mars sky, and the two have been composited together."


"It's hard to list everything that's wrong with this composite. It's an all-sky infrared image posted on to a daytime image taken from the surface of Mars, if you can see the landscape this clearly it wouldn't be possible to see the Milky Way. It pays no respect to scale, orientation or our intelligence.

The optics on the Curiosity rover are designed for taking sharp images in bright sunshine. It doesn't have a fast wide-angle lens suitable for taking nightscapes. Here's an actual image taken from Mars at night:"


Can you post the source of those quotes.
 

boogers

cats rule, dogs drool
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
10,461
Reputation
5,021
Daps
30,200
Reppin
#catset
It was proved that it was a heavy edited image.

"The landscape around Perseverance is real, and the sky is real, but it’s an Earth sky, not a Mars sky, and the two have been composited together."


"It's hard to list everything that's wrong with this composite. It's an all-sky infrared image posted on to a daytime image taken from the surface of Mars, if you can see the landscape this clearly it wouldn't be possible to see the Milky Way. It pays no respect to scale, orientation or our intelligence.

The optics on the Curiosity rover are designed for taking sharp images in bright sunshine. It doesn't have a fast wide-angle lens suitable for taking nightscapes. Here's an actual image taken from Mars at night:"


man 1 star this gay ass thread :pacspit:

so tired of fakery for fake internet points
 

Blessings

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
17,176
Reputation
2,933
Daps
49,303
Reppin
NULL
The budget of nasa is a fraction of what it is for the military.

Imagine what would be happening if america scaled down military investment and went full steam ahead with investment into science and technology for the public interest. I sincerely hope within my lifetime a reset happens and america gets back on track. Enough with the right wing bullshyt, enough with the privatization and monetization of everything.

I firmly believe if wealth is transferred back to the public and people are put to work, science, health and education are put front and center, we'll have robots on mars actively building things and performing experiments to help us learn about that planet.

With the right materials, we'll be able to design crafts and robots that can travel to other planets in our solar system and explore them. If humanity is able to collaborate and really use its collective intelligence, I don't have any doubt that within 300 years we will have figured out how to settle mars and would have terrariums that simulate earth gravity, plants, etc. or will have figured out how to terraform planets. If that sounds crazy, think about what the state of technology was 300 years ago. Nobody even had an inkling of the technology you're currently using to read this.


Well said + repped
 
Top