He says himself ""I prefer not to have labels, but I suspect that 'libertarian' would suit me better than many others, although I disagree with the libertarian movement on a number of things"
and what is this private tyranny you speak of?
syndicalism sounds like some newly discovered venereal disease...adding the Anarcho to it doesnt help..from what ive read its basically labor union socialism..they probably had to add the Anarcho part cos everybody could see where syndicalism itself was headed
Every couple of decades some intellectual academic douchebag (cough* chomsky ) develops some new flavor of marxism in their heads and says "ive solved the problem"
"this is the new and improved starvation free socialism" but it never works out that way...collectivism almost always fails ..its human nature
God help the nation that is foolish enough to try your *anarcho syndicalism*...theyll wish it was just a venereal disease
Read that statement then google Hong kong and N korea ...economic success is directly related to economic freedom which is linked to personal freedom
imma let the legend milton friedman tell u why
Ahhh Chomsky bashing by an an cap.
Typical LMAO.
Private tyranny is the result of State tyranny being off shored to the private owners of the means do production. Think feudalism.
Anarcho syndicalism has been around much longer than Chomsky. See Proudhon and Lagardelle.
You are under the rather foolish notion that we have much economic freedom to begin with.
Contrary to your nonsense an cap beliefs. The less power owners of production are, the more economic freedom everyone else has