Can a mod or staff member supply some input![]()

Can a mod or staff member supply some input![]()
The same kind of grown man that still watches wrestling i guess![]()
This is interesting.Can a mod or staff member supply some input![]()
Thanks for readingThis is interesting.
Thishas been suggested several times before and was rejected. They basically said the rep system gets abused by all the fakkit rep boosting cliques and that itd be too easy for people to gang up on posters so they cant make threads.
Use the ignore function.
then they should get rid of rep if it's being abused.
This thread is a lose therapy session.
Users in green suck each other off like high school kids because they suffer the disease of gratitude. They were losers in high school, unpopular no p*ssy getters so they makin up for lost time by getting back at the popular kids with their emotionally filled negs cause they feelings get hurt too often![]()
Sounds like butthurt talk from an idiot who does nothing but one star threads and lust after trannies.Your rep sucks because you suck as a poster and as a person.
This idea is pretty good, although there are decent posters in the red who got there because they have controversial views and aren't afraid to express them. Therefore, I don't think that everyone who's in the red should get their thread-creating privileges taken away. Part of what makes message boards great is discussions where different opinions are expressed. Sometimes, these conversations get heated and people neg each other. If a new poster gets into the red because they were outspoken about a hot topic, but is sincere and not truly horrible, they should be able to make threads even if they're a bit in the red.
But if a poster is around -5,000 to -10,000 or more, it's probably because they really suck, and should not be able to make threads. Hell, I wouldn't mind seeing posters who get to -10,000 get outright banned.