Time for real talk on affirmative action. Indians and Asians about to get that wake up call when the SCOTUS eliminates it.

[saturn7]

OK, You didn't vote.

Whats Step B?

When? You see my 2020 ballot. Stop fukking playing with me, fukking bootlicker.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Because the original language used was flawed!!! Because it was based on race, not lineage.

Did you notice how the second attempt differs?

its lineage.

You got what you wanted. But you didn't realize it.

Then you'll say "it includes non-black people"...well then you'll say you want race criteria

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

When? You see my 2020 ballot. Stop fukking playing with me, fukking bootlicker.

How's that working out for you?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

How am I a clown? For actually putting my vote, and my effort where my mouth is?

You and the rest of the shills are the real clowns.
Keep voting for nothing and acting like you are doing something.

You didn't do anything

Duverger's law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Amo Husserl]

Proxy groups starting proxy wars to the detriment of black people.
They'll most likely strike it down to let the states handle it.
At that point you have to watch conservatives posing as liberals getting funny in the admissions departments.
Affirmative action has it's problems, but it shouldn't be the cause of unintended minorities trying to strike it down at the expense of who it was originally intended for.
I can only hope HBCUs expand their curriculum and more ADOS/FBAs start attending if or when this happens.
If it does happen, ADOS/FBA need to rally around HBCUs and lock down the admission process to preferential admission based on lineage.
It won't be reparations, but it will be a start to hold and build our institutions.

 

[saturn7]

How's that working out for you?

It's working out great for me. My conscious is clear.
I'm for Freedman/ADOS first. Not Democratic party first.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

It's working out great for me. My conscious is clear.
I'm for Freedman/ADOS first. Not Democratic party first.

Homeless people have clear consciousness

 

[TripleAgent]

I don't expect small government Republicans to support Reparations.




I expect the party we give 90% of our fukking vote to to be serious and try to pass Reparations!!!

What is wrong with you nikkas???

Wild, isn't it?

FOH

Punjabi IMMIGRANTS
LIKE YOURSELF HAVE
BENEFITTED FROM AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN DROVES
BUT NATIVE BLACK AMERICANS HAVENT BECAUSE "WE ALL BLACK"
AT THE END OF THE DAY
WHEN THEYRE FILLING THEYRE QUOTAS.

SAME WAY OUR "BLACK" PRESIDENT
AND "BLACK" VICE PRESIDENT BENEFITTED.


​

FTFY

 

[Phitz]

An anti-affirmative action group is trying to erase race from college admissions

Lower court losses for Students For Fair Admissions get legal strategist Edward Blum closer to his ultimate goal: returning to the Supreme Court.

www.politico.com

From Jan 1, 2020

how's their progress going

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

From Jan 1, 2020

how's their progress going

I take it that you don't live in the U.S.?

 

[Phitz]

I take it that you don't live in the U.S.?

correct

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

From Jan 1, 2020

how's their progress going

Affirmative action cases up first in November argument calendar - SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court will kick off its November argument session with the highest-profile cases of that session: challenges to the consideration of race in the admissions process at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. That news came with the release of the November argument calendar (as well

www.scotusblog.com

The Supreme Court will kick off its November argument session with the highest-profile cases of that session: challenges to the consideration of race in the admissions process at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. That news came with the release of the November argument calendar (as well as an updated October argument calendar) on Wednesday.

The justices will hear oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College on Oct. 31, the first day of the November session. When the court agreed in January to take up the two cases, it indicated that the cases would be argued and considered together. However, after the retirement of Justice Stephen Breyer and the confirmation of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who until recently served on Harvard’s board of overseers, the court announced that it would hear the cases separately, which will allow Jackson to participate in the UNC case.

The affirmative action cases are two of 13 cases scheduled for oral argument in November, for a total of 10 hours of argument. Although they are the highest-profile cases on the November argument calendar, the justices will also hear oral argument in important cases involving (among other things) the power of federal district courts and the constitutionality of a federal law designed to protect against the separation of Native American families.

The justices also released a revised calendar for the October argument session. The court moved Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway, which had originally been one of three cases scheduled for argument on Oct. 11, to Nov. 8, leaving only two cases on Oct. 11.

Here is the full list of cases scheduled for the November argument session:

• Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina (Oct. 31): Whether to overrule the court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, holding that the University of Michigan could consider race in its undergraduate admissions process as part of its efforts to obtain a diverse student body.
• Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Oct. 31): Whether to overrule the court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, holding that the University of Michigan could consider race in its undergraduate admissions process as part of its efforts to obtain a diverse student body.

 

[Lakers Offseason]

This dude gotta be a plant. Top 6 google search results on 'who benefits the most from affirmative action'

White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents

The willingness to erase white women from the story of affirmative action is part of the problem.

www.vox.com

White Women Benefit Most From Affirmative Action

Yet conversations about affirmative action tend to focus on race, not gender.

www.teenvogue.com

Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone

Studies show affirmative action helps white women as much or more than others

time.com

Who Does Affirmative Action Benefit? White Women Are Some Of Its Biggest Opponents

On Tuesday evening, the New York Times revealed a new bombshell. Recently obtained documents from the Justice Department indicate the Trump administration is planning to target affirmative action on university campuses, likely arguing that it…

www.bustle.com

White women: affirmative action's biggest beneficiaries and opponents

Supreme Court Immigration

www.nola.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/who-benefits-from-affirmative-action-white-men/2017/08/11/4b56907e-7eab-11e7-a669-b400c5c7e1cc_story.html

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

correct

Gotcha.

Since trump has stacked the courts with ultra conservatives we're probably looking at the end of race based affirmative action policies for colleges.

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

This dude gotta be a plant. Top 6 google search results on 'who benefits the most from affirmative action'

White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents

The willingness to erase white women from the story of affirmative action is part of the problem.

www.vox.com

White Women Benefit Most From Affirmative Action

Yet conversations about affirmative action tend to focus on race, not gender.

www.teenvogue.com

Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone

Studies show affirmative action helps white women as much or more than others

time.com

Who Does Affirmative Action Benefit? White Women Are Some Of Its Biggest Opponents

On Tuesday evening, the New York Times revealed a new bombshell. Recently obtained documents from the Justice Department indicate the Trump administration is planning to target affirmative action on university campuses, likely arguing that it…

www.bustle.com

White women: affirmative action's biggest beneficiaries and opponents

Supreme Court Immigration

www.nola.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/who-benefits-from-affirmative-action-white-men/2017/08/11/4b56907e-7eab-11e7-a669-b400c5c7e1cc_story.html

And your point?

Matter of fact just go back and read the first 2 pages of the thread. It's already been addressed that gender based policies aren't under attack.