Time to school the Black Apologists: We commit the most "crimes" theory

[MegaManX]

In this game, we have two room.

I will explain everything at the end.


First room has

• 3 nails scattered through the room
• a door to exit.
• a starting location

Second room has

• 200 nails scattered through the room.
• a door to exit
• a starting location.

Suspect A goes to the first room. He is given

• Timberland Boots

Suspect B goes to the second room. He is given

• nothing. He is barefoot.

The Examiner is given incentive to get the highest results possible. The condition that must be met is

• Suspect must be bleeding from the foot to be punished.

The test begins.

SUSPECT B

1. Suspect B is 99x more likely to step on a tac with everything else equal.
2. On top of that, he is barefoot so he has no shoes so any tac he steps on will cause him to bleed.
3. Also, the Examiner has incentive to punish by numbers and not quality so the easier the puncture the better.

SUSPECT A

1. Suspect A can easily avoid stepping on a tac because there are barely any in his area.
2. If suspect A does accidentally step on a tac, his Boots have a high chance of protecting him from puncturing his foot.
3. Since incentive is for numbers, the Examiner will ignore that room all together as it doesn't benefit him.

How does this translate?

By the Examiner's notes.

• Suspect B is more prone to incidents.
• Suspect B is given equal treatment under the rules. Both had to exit the room without injury.
• Suspect B is judged more harshly for even the slightest puncture of the skin, even when there is no blood since there is incentive to do so.

Now what are all these elements in the real world?

Suspect A is white people in society.
Suspect B is Black people in society.

The rooms are the communities in which they live.

The steps they literally take is crimes being committed.

Only the crimes that are caught are considered criminal offenses. (Examiner decides)

Tacs are cops. Low deployment in certain neighborhoods, high deployment in others.

Boots is wealth and influence. If somehow a white person gets arrested, these will usually stop them from being charged.

Examiner is a judge.

the condition for punishment is the well crafted legal term to target certain individuals easier.

The Examiner's opinion is "Discretion."


Is this fair? If you look at the details because you are suspect B, it clearly is not.

If you are white, however, you only look at the results and say Blacks are

• Commit the highest percentage of crimes. (Something that only a judge can decide.)
• If blacks obeyed the law, they wouldn't be stopped. Ignore incentive and numbers of police

 

[MegaManX]

bump

 

[Easy-E]

Give us a minute to digest this breh

 

[Easy-E]

Done

We gotta realize that this game is rigged.

This aint accidental

Then make a choice if where we going fron there

 

[HabitualLineSteppa]

This is why you do not communicate with the type of folks who require such a breakdown. If it takes THIS many keystrokes/words to say what is an EASILY understood, although difficult to accept reality, they aren't worth the time at this point. We know from childhood what is and isn't acceptable treatment breh.

Just tell them....NOTHING and keep it pushing...let them and their ilk catch it later...They always do...even if they lie outwardly, they know whats up...

 

[010101]

duh poverty drives crime*

 

[CarbonBraddock]

they will say that there are more police bc they commit more offenses to begin with. it comes down to two things that i can see, either black people are just genetically defective and will commit more crimes period, OR they are committing more crime bc of their environment i.e. low-income and perhaps broken homes. I do not believe that blacks are genetically predisposed to crime and i think that in the earlier 20th century, blacks did not commit so much crime until all the welfare and government assistance shyt started being rolled out. seems like there would be extensive scientific study done on the effects of growing up in poverty or in the environment that many of these so-called 'criminals' grew up in.

 

[Reflected]

Bruh, you took your time to make a game to explain basic sociology? lol

 

[Treblemaka]

 

[MegaManX]

they will say that there are more police bc they commit more offenses to begin with. it comes down to two things that i can see, either black people are just genetically defective and will commit more crimes period, OR they are committing more crime bc of their environment i.e. low-income and perhaps broken homes. I do not believe that blacks are genetically predisposed to crime and i think that in the earlier 20th century, blacks did not commit so much crime until all the welfare and government assistance shyt started being rolled out. seems like there would be extensive scientific study done on the effects of growing up in poverty or in the environment that many of these so-called 'criminals' grew up in.

look up " red lining." It had nothing to do with free stuff from the government for blacks and more to do with free stuff from the government for whites.

 

[TEH]

understood ... just don't make me saw off my foot

 

[CarbonBraddock]

look up " red lining." It had nothing to do with free stuff from the government for blacks and more to do with free stuff from the government for whites.

true, but welfare also had devastating effects on the black family, which also could have resulted in more crime