Interview with the Vampire - Rotten Tomatoes
interview with a vampire got 61%

i agree with the audience opinion
interview with a vampire got 61%

i agree with the audience opinion

![]()
![]()
ROTTEN TOMATOES DOES NOT REVIEW MOVIES THEY ASSIGN A PERCENTAGE BASED ON ALL REVIEWS OF A FILM BY HOW MANY CRITICS RECOMMENDED THE FILM. A MOVIE GETTING A SCORE OF SAY 45% ONLY MEANS 45% OF REVIEWERS RECOMMENDED THE FILM, IT IS NOT A REVIEW OR SCORE OF THE ACTUAL FILM!
fukk.
TO ADD TO THAT NOT EVERY PERCENTAGE MEANS THE SAME, A FILM CAN HAVE A 90% RATING AND ONLY HAVE AN AVERAGE SCORE OF 8/10 WHILE ANOTHER MOVIE WITH A 90% CAN HAVE AN AVERAGE SCORE OF 9.5/10.
THE PERCENTAGE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITY OF THE FILM IT IS NOT A REVIEW.

Everybody already know this dumbass![]()
nikka attention span....fukk you. That was a great film.![]()
no, they dont. have you even bothered reading replies in this same thread? people blaming scores on rt,talkin bout they gave man on fire 38%, thats like blaming metacritic for the critics hating an album. they didnt review man on fire, how is that rotten tomatoes fault? blame critics, not rt.
Coming in here talking like we all think there is one fat guy in a basement office somewhere rating all the movies on RT or something.
It got a 19These nikkas gave Man on Fire a fukking 38%
Da fukk???
Movie had so many plot holes and awkward moments. I tried watching this again on HBO and it was ass. 
Man of Steel 57%at least 85%+
Rango 88%movie was garbage
fast & Furious 27%should of been at least a high 60's
warm bodies 81%garbage
zombieland 90%garbage
