Use strawmans brehsWith a WOMAN laying in my bed waiting for me to get off WORK. Two things you are unfamiliar with

Use strawmans brehsWith a WOMAN laying in my bed waiting for me to get off WORK. Two things you are unfamiliar with
Not at all actually. You laid out a bunch of word soup and I called you on it.Now, you're deflecting because you can't come up with an answer to my statement
If you take an idealistic approach it can but those third party candidates aren't about to win the election. I'm not down with any of this shyt and wish it could be much better but I'm not an idealist. If all four had a real shot at winning I'd say you were making sense. As it stands, third party votes just serve to rob the votes from the potential winner their views align with. It has been proven time and time again.So, you down with a corrupt two party systemJohnson takes votes from disgruntled Dems and Repubs. Stein takes votes from Dem Progressives. So, could I say Clinton is robbing us of Stein votes? That could play both ways.
I don't believe shyt Clinton says that's thee issue. She has a history of lying. In an election you have to EARN votes. Stein has EARNED my vote.Not at all actually. You laid out a bunch of word soup and I called you on it.
Hillary laid out her plan in her speech at the DNC and Bernie Sanders supports her.
Third party candidates offer nothing and won't be elected they only offer to give Trump the presidency.
It's not about winning it's about them getting over 5% for 2020, so we can have more than 2 parties. They get federal funding if they get over 5% of thee vote.If you take an idealistic approach it can but those third party candidates aren't about to win the election. I'm not down with any of this shyt and wish it could be much better but I'm not an idealist. If all four had a real shot at winning I'd say you were making sense. As it stands, third party votes just serve to rob the votes from the potential winner their views align with. It has been proven time and time again.
I don't believe shyt Clinton says that's thee issue. She has a history of lying. In an election you have to EARN votes. Stein has EARNED my vote.
She doesn't have a history of lying and I'm not going to argue about it with you. You're one thick headed confused c00n.