I just wanted to share this graph with y'all which is a scale ranking differents drugs (including tobacco, alcohol) :
It's a scale summarizing a study from The Lancet, which is a well-respect medical journal.
The study analized differents drugs from different classes (A (most penalized), B and C) as ranked in the Misuse of Drugs Act which was a law applied in Commonwealth countries.
For scientific purposes, the journal added Alcohol, Alkyl Nitrites (most known as poppers), Ketamine (later classified), Khat, Solvents (glue, ethanol, chloroform, gasoline, ether) and Tobacco which were not classified in the Drugs Act.
Here's a quote summing up the whole study :
Here are the tables of the study (in spoiler tags because these are big images) :
Here's the full .PDF of the study :
LINK : Psychoactive drugs of misuse: rationalising the irrational, 2007
Here's a report in .PDF from the Science and Technology Committee (UK Parliament) discussing this drug classification seeing as more political than scientific :
LINK : Drug classification: making a hash of it?
It's a scale summarizing a study from The Lancet, which is a well-respect medical journal.
The study analized differents drugs from different classes (A (most penalized), B and C) as ranked in the Misuse of Drugs Act which was a law applied in Commonwealth countries.
For scientific purposes, the journal added Alcohol, Alkyl Nitrites (most known as poppers), Ketamine (later classified), Khat, Solvents (glue, ethanol, chloroform, gasoline, ether) and Tobacco which were not classified in the Drugs Act.
Here's a quote summing up the whole study :
The results of this study do not provide justification for the sharp A, B, or C divisions of the current classifications in the UK Misuse of Drugs Act. Distinct categorisation is, of course, convenient for setting of priorities for policing, education, and social support, as well as to determine sentencing for possession or dealing. But neither the rank ordering of drugs nor their segregation into groups in the Misuse of Drugs Act classification is supported by the more complete assessment of harm described here. Sharply defined categories in any ranking system are essentially arbitrary unless there are obvious discontinuities in the full set of scores. Figure 1 [mean harm scores] shows only a hint of such a transition in the spectrum of harm, in the small step in the very middle of the distribution, between buprenorphine and cannabis. Interestingly, alcohol and tobacco are both in the top ten, higher-harm group. There is a rapidly accelerating harm value from alcohol upwards. So, if a three-category classification were to be retained, one possible interpretation of our findings is that drugs with harm scores equal to that of alcohol and above might be class A, cannabis and those below might be class C, and drugs in between might be class B. In that case, it is salutary to see that alcohol and tobaccothe most widely used unclassified substanceswould have harm ratings comparable with class A and B illegal drugs, respectively.
Here are the tables of the study (in spoiler tags because these are big images) :
Parameters
2007 status of the 20 assessed substances
Mean harm scores
Correlation between mean scores and addiction
Final classification
2007 status of the 20 assessed substances
Mean harm scores
Correlation between mean scores and addiction
Final classification
LINK : Psychoactive drugs of misuse: rationalising the irrational, 2007
Here's a report in .PDF from the Science and Technology Committee (UK Parliament) discussing this drug classification seeing as more political than scientific :
LINK : Drug classification: making a hash of it?