
see this is what i'm talking about...I already dreaded your argument fam. None of those numbers matter because the patriots were cheating during those runs and the results you listed would have only been worst if they were playing under regular circumstances
How has your boy done when he didn't have to fall back on Adam v making a game winner?![]()

Maybe it's your reading comprehension that is lacking. I'll ask once again just for the hell of it. Maybe you'll say something substantive besides "it's irrelevant" this time: How is spygate so relevant when the Patriots both won and lost by the same exact slim margins? According to your argument, they had a huge advantage during spygate, when winning all their SBs by 3 pts. AFTER spygate, they lost both SBs by the same margins, 3 pts.
Are you telling us that the ever powerful manipulation of the evil spygate system was responsible for a grand total of a 6 point swing?![]()


you're dodging their post spygate Super Bowl performances once again. The defenses have performed the same. It's your boyish hate of Brady that won't let you address it. You just refuse.You still not getting it
The fact the patriots were CHEATING and only won superbowls by 3 points helps my argument. What do you think the margin would have been if they weren't using stolen signals? You think instead of barely winning by 3 they would have lost by more? The fact they were cheating and still barely won doesn't help your end at all
But answer this one for me breh breh, cause this is the kicker, how many superbowls have they WON since they were penalized for CHEATING?![]()
you're dodging their post spygate Super Bowl performances once again. The defenses have performed the same. It's your boyish hate of Brady that won't let you address it. You just refuse.

meh.. why bother. You're an emotional mental midget. It's my bad for thinking you would address the same point you dodge in every thread.I'll sum up their post spy gate SB performances for you again. No Hall of Fame defense, No Adam V, No rings. You getting it yet?
meh.. why bother. You're an emotional mental midget. It's my bad for thinking you would address the same point you dodge in every thread.
The facts are that Brady is better than Manning in every single way. More rings, more wins, best season ever,etc. This eats you up. That's why you're in every Brady thread. Manning is top 5 all-time, but he's not fukking with Brady and those are simply the facts.I know the truth is hard to accept sometimes. But we only deal with #FactsOnly around these parts
The facts are that Brady is better than Manning in every single way. More rings, more wins, best season ever,etc. This eats you up. That's why you're in every Brady thread. Manning is top 5 all-time, but he's not fukking with Brady and those are simply the facts.


