TOURÉ "How would you feel with my cum on your face" NEBLETT OUT HERE LYING FOR HARRIET MOVIE

[invalid]

I haven’t seen the movie and not going to. Is it true that the slave owner is saving Harriet from death so that he can torture her? Like what happened in Django when Sam L Jackson saved Django to send him to the quarries?

Also, having a black traitor who stood in the way of black liberty the way that Toure explains it doesn’t seem too off? We see it today.

Wasn’t Nat Turner compromised by other slaves?

Also, although it’s a complete fabrication in the Harriet story, I recall seeing black slave catchers depicted in another movie or another story. Can’t think of it right now though.

 

[King Harlem]

He's right for the most part.
The movie is really bad. It feels like a made for television Hallmark movie, but there isn't a white savior. It's disingenuous to paint that one scene as such. The Black bounty hunter wasn't the main villain, the White slave owner is clearly the main villain.
I know many people don't want this film to be successful, but they are trying to manipulate people in order to do so, when all you have to do is use facts:
The movie was bad.
The screenplay was badly written.
The score was laughably terrible.
That's it.

 

[jackson35]

Was he a slave catcher

i just said he drop dime on her. he did not support her efforts to free other Africans.mr tubman wass the only one qualified to bring her back. he use the reward money to marry another woman when he return her.

 

[jackson35]

He's right for the most part.
The movie is really bad. It feels like a made for television Hallmark movie, but there isn't a white savior. It's disingenuous to paint that one scene as such. The Black bounty hunter wasn't the main villain, the White slave owner is clearly the main villain.
I know many people don't want this film to be successful, but they are trying to manipulate people in order to do so, when all you have to do is use facts:
The movie was bad.
The screenplay was badly written.
The score was laughably terrible.
That's it.

bingo u nail it.

 

[TRY GOD]

i just said he drop dime on her. he did not support her efforts to free other Africans.mr tubman wass the only one qualified to bring her back. he use the reward money to marry another woman when he return her.

Did he catch slaves for money, AKA a slave catcher

 

[TRY GOD]

He's right for the most part.
The movie is really bad. It feels like a made for television Hallmark movie, but there isn't a white savior. It's disingenuous to paint that one scene as such. The Black bounty hunter wasn't the main villain, the White slave owner is clearly the main villain..

. That is a fukking lie, the slave owner LITERALLY saves Harriett Tubman. So what Is he right about?

 

[invalid]

He's right for the most part.
The movie is really bad. It feels like a made for television Hallmark movie, but there isn't a white savior. It's disingenuous to paint that one scene as such. The Black bounty hunter wasn't the main villain, the White slave owner is clearly the main villain.
I know many people don't want this film to be successful, but they are trying to manipulate people in order to do so, when all you have to do is use facts:
The movie was bad.
The screenplay was badly written.
The score was laughably terrible.
That's it.

Thanks. Knew there had to be another side. Toure is a critic. So how he was able to gleam out of a movie what apparently nobody else was able to gleam didn’t make much sense to me.

Still not seeing it though.

 

[King Harlem]

. That is a fukking lie, the slave owner LITERALLY saves Harriett Tubman. So what Is he right about?

You have to watch the movie to understand how badly written this is. The white slave owner is the main villain, he wanted to capture Harriet and literally brutalize and make her an example. He wanted something worse than death for her. He is not a white savior, he is the white villain. There is nothing redeemable about that character.
Again, you can't try to fit him into this white savior narrative when he is the reason that Harriet has to go and free several slaves because HE'S ENSLAVING THEM.

The movie is really, really bad. There is no need to make this into a White savior narrative to prevent people from supporting it.

 

[invalid]

. That is a fukking lie, the slave owner LITERALLY saves Harriett Tubman. So what Is he right about?

You made a whole thread and outchea missing important points from the movie.

 

[TRY GOD]

You have to watch the movie to understand how badly written this is. The white slave owner is the main villain, he wanted to capture Harriet and literally brutalize and make her an example. He wanted something worse than death for her. He is not a white savior, he is the white villain. There is nothing redeemable about that character.
Again, you can't try to fit him into this white savior narrative when he is the reason that Harriet has to go and free several slaves because HE'S ENSLAVING THEM.

The movie is really, really bad. There is no need to make this into a White savior narrative to prevent people from supporting it.

You made a whole thread and outchea missing important points from the movie.

So the person who saves Harriet, isn't her savior now?

Does he want to save her to torture her or save her because he love her?

Why does Harriet let him live if he wants to torture her?

 

[Thanos]

Folks debating the semantics of white savior. If someone takes you from a worse place to another bad place. You weren't saved.

 

[King Harlem]

So the person who saves Harriet, isn't her savior now?

Does he want to save her to torture her or save her because he love her?

Why does Harriet let him live if he wants to torture her?

The movie is bad. He doesn't love her. He told Black dude not to kill her, that he wants her alive so he can thoroughly violate her and in front of the rest of the White Slave Masters because they are mad that his former slave is freeing all their slaves.

Please stop having me defend this movie, its tiring.
But this great White Savior that is being presented is false. It was happenstance.

 

[invalid]

So the person who saves Harriet, isn't her savior now?

Does he want to save her to torture her or save her because he love her?

Why does Harriet let him live if he wants to torture her?

Where did you get a love story out of this? Did you even see the movie?

Remind me not to read your movie reviews anymore.

 

[TripleAgent]

The movie is bad. He doesn't love her. He told Black dude not to kill her, that he wants her alive so he can thoroughly violate her and in front of the rest of the White Slave Masters because they are mad that his former slave is freeing all their slaves.

Please stop having me defend this movie, its tiring.
But this great White Savior that is being presented is false. It was happenstance.

He wanted to do all that, but saved her, then LET HER GO

 

[King Harlem]

He wanted to do all that, but saved her, then LET HER GO

There was no Letting Her Go, he had no choice. She shot his hand off and had her gun on him. There was no letting.
Y'all really want this to be true....but its not.