Tracy McGrady vs Dwyane Wade

...


  • Total voters
    166

dem bath salts

To be reckoned with
Supporter
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
12,655
Reputation
2,530
Daps
26,831
Reppin
Broward
Wade. T-mac a better shooter, but Wade in his prime was one of the most athletic guards the game ever saw.
 

Racked Up

Pro
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
552
Reputation
131
Daps
942
Reppin
NULL
Take a closer look at his playoff stats though, he absolutely dominated the ball and wasn't really shooting a good percentage. Those Rockets in 06-07 had no excuse losing to the Jazz, zero, they had the two best players in the series, homecourt and still lost :mindblown:

Tmac shooting 39% from the field had nothing to do with the loss?

The Jazz were a young team, the Rockets had vets, there's no excuse for it.

yea he shot horribly but he provided more than scoring... 6 boards, 7 assists, and a block a game.

Yao got destroyed bruh i watched that series with the :snoop: face. Couldn't guard Okur because of the range and Boozer went off on the boards and mid range 2


Where am i lying bruh :mjpls:
 

Stinky Diver

attitude as bad as his odor
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,627
Reputation
1,161
Daps
20,526
Wade just does so much more to impact a game than McGrady, its not even funny. With both in their primes, give me the player that avg. 27ppg, shooting damn near 50%, while being the facilitator and top defensive player(man and weak side help).
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,321
Daps
241,485
Where am i lying bruh :mjpls:

Cause your reasoning as to why tmac is better than wade is pathetic. You just twisting the most minimalist and insignificant areas of the game you can find to favor your argument.

'causes more match up problems with his height'
'more versatile defender (guarded dirk in playoffs)'

like 'i know tmac ain't a better defender, but imma go and say he's a more versatile defender because of his height'... give me a fukking break.

:russ:
 

YBE

Banned
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
5,125
Reputation
-5
Daps
5,526
*Reminisces on playing NBA Live 2000 with Vince Carter & TMac* :merchant:

A 6"8 point forward who could give you 30 everynight and a kid who could snatch $5 off the top of the backboard.

How the fukk did that not work out in real life? :skip:
 
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,228
Reputation
4,185
Daps
59,171
Reppin
NULL
I picked Tmac, but I think I just fell victim to nostalgia :( . Tmac was a great player, very versatile, but he was very ball dominant and he wasn't as efficient as Wade was. The fact that Wade was able to put up 30 a game while shooting damn near %50 as a perimeter player in today's game is insane. D wade shooting efficiency blows t-macs out the water, even though Tmac was the more skilled offensive player, D wade was the more unstoppable one. D wade in his prime was one of the few players who could impose his will on a game. Both are two of my favorites, but I'm going with Wade (or at least I should have:comeon:) .
 

Racked Up

Pro
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
552
Reputation
131
Daps
942
Reppin
NULL
Cause your reasoning as to why tmac is better than wade is pathetic. You just twisting the most minimalist and insignificant areas of the game you can find to favor your argument.

'causes more match up problems with his height'
'more versatile defender (guarded dirk in playoffs)'

like 'i know tmac ain't a better defender, but imma go and say he's a more versatile defender because of his height'... give me a fukking break.

:russ:

:pachaha:

its true tho :mjpls:

an he did avg 1.9 blocks before :whoo:
 
Top