TradCaths finding out how Catholicism works

Chronic

All Star
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
1,795
Reputation
3,110
Daps
8,012






Get ethered by community notes breh
Screenshot-20231115-005143-Chrome.jpg

Screenshot-20231115-005201-Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited:

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
21,057
Reputation
5,125
Daps
83,930
:russ:

Edit: Im aware of how the papacy works, but can anyone explain how does the Catholic Church enforce his actions abroad? Is it mostly a we just don’t recognize you, you’re a rogue bishop situation?
 

Gloxina

Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
34,164
Reputation
13,909
Daps
115,166
They dont even know their own history on why they wanted to get away from Catholicism and Kings lmaoooo
These ppl are fukkkng idiots!


Went to catholic school my entire life; carried me from K to the age of 18 and it was a great experience for the most part. Even after 14yrs in that environment I still would never convert to Catholicism. Lol

How is that your faith by birth or choice and you don’t know how it works?!
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
23,682
Reputation
13,411
Daps
137,138
American "Christians" aren't actually Christians. Christianity to them is a social club that gives them the "right" to look down on others.

You can't call yourself a Christian then fight legislation designed to feed children. You can't call yourself a Christian and support any sort of war unless it's a defensive one and even then you still want the fighting to stop asap. You can't call yourself a Christian and then oppose anything that let's black people get on an equal footing. You can't call yourself a Christian and then oppose the teaching of history because you're afraid that your children will feel bad and *gasp* want to make up for what their ancestors did.
 

The Fade

I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
24,521
Reputation
7,936
Daps
133,129
American "Christians" aren't actually Christians. Christianity to them is a social club that gives them the "right" to look down on others.

You can't call yourself a Christian then fight legislation designed to feed children. You can't call yourself a Christian and support any sort of war unless it's a defensive one and even then you still want the fighting to stop asap. You can't call yourself a Christian and then oppose anything that let's black people get on an equal footing. You can't call yourself a Christian and then oppose the teaching of history because you're afraid that your children will feel bad and *gasp* want to make up for what their ancestors did.
I've learned that people use Christianity to hide their real cults and religions underneath it. The Dominiant view of white Christianity has Germanic Viking shyt and Greek shyt leaking out for example. They de-emphasized the ascetic principles and de-emphasized marginalized people using mutual aid. Catholics killed some of those sects off and called other schools heretics. Waldensian still do those things like preach social justice and some American Reformers helped free us and then we used to have a huge Mutual Aid culture in our own Black Tradition(still there but struggling) but over all the dominant view is them using it to justify undercover viking raids (The Crusades, Klan and Mob raids into Black towns, Modern day Warhawking).
 
Last edited:

Pirius Black

Superstar
Joined
Jan 25, 2017
Messages
2,378
Reputation
1,665
Daps
17,389
How the fukk are you larping as a Catholic and you not know how the doctrine of papal supremacy works. There is a reason why "papist" or "Pope Lover" used to be an insult that could literally disqualify you from public office here.
 

invalid

Veteran
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
21,462
Reputation
7,598
Daps
85,999
:russ:

Edit: Im aware of how the papacy works, but can anyone explain how does the Catholic Church enforce his actions abroad? Is it mostly a we just don’t recognize you, you’re a rogue bishop situation?

The Papacy was set up as a monarchy and exercise absolute power and legal control over Catholics everywhere. What that means is, not just in matters of religious authority, but in terms of ownership, all assets of the Catholic Church belongs to the Papal seat. That includes everything from St. Patricks Cathedral in Manhattan all the way down to the little Catholic Church in the middle of nowhere in Texas.

So if we took this particular situation, if the Papacy wanted to, after removing the Texas Bishop, they could bar him from stepping into any Catholic Church within the diocese he presided over in Texas because they are the owners of all Catholic property. No Catholic Priest or Bishop would be able to override it. If the Papacy wanted to they could seize all the property in his diocese and sell it off. That is the nature of the hierarchal authority of the church. It serves as a checks and balances.

Now the Bishop could try to have his diocese separate from the Catholic Church, but they wouldn't be recognized as Catholic anymore and all the churches, property or assets that he presided over would be seized by the Church. If he wanted to continue to minister, he would essentially have to become Protestant and not claim himself as Catholic.

It's different from American protestant churches where power is set up horizontally (not vertically like the Catholic Church). For instance, TD Jakes is the CEO of his church. He's not a member of a denomination where he would have to answer to some higher authority like a Bishop. He makes all the decisions and if he was to be removed from his church, it would have to come from the congregation itself, and not some higher organizational authority because there is none.
But since he's the CEO, he owns all property and assets so that could cause legal problems. Essentially, his congregation would probably have to leave and start a spinoff if they no longer want to be under his leadership but they couldn't take the church or any affiliated property or assets with them because they are all owned by TD Jakes. In a lot of cases like this, this is where you have a lot of corruption with pastors doing whatever they want to do, especially with money, because their is no higher authority to check them or sets the parameters of spending. The CEO does that and with a lot of Protestant churches in America, the pastor is CEO.
 

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
21,057
Reputation
5,125
Daps
83,930
The Papacy was set up as a monarchy and exercise absolute power and legal control over Catholics everywhere. What that means is, not just in matters of religious authority, but in terms of ownership, all assets of the Catholic Church belongs to the Papal seat. That includes everything from St. Patricks Cathedral in Manhattan all the way down to the little Catholic Church in the middle of nowhere in Texas.

So if we took this particular situation, if the Papacy wanted to, after removing the Texas Bishop, they could bar him from stepping into any Catholic Church within the diocese he presided over in Texas because they are the owners of all Catholic property. No Catholic Priest or Bishop would be able to override it. If the Papacy wanted to they could seize all the property in his diocese and sell it off. That is the nature of the hierarchal authority of the church. It serves as a checks and balances.

Now the Bishop could try to have his diocese separate from the Catholic Church, but they wouldn't be recognized as Catholic anymore and all the churches, property or assets that he presided over would be seized by the Church. If he wanted to continue to minister, he would essentially have to become Protestant and not claim himself as Catholic.

It's different from American protestant churches where power is set up horizontally (not vertically like the Catholic Church). For instance, TD Jakes is the CEO of his church. He's not a member of a denomination where he would have to answer to some higher authority like a Bishop. He makes all the decisions and if he was to be removed from his church, it would have to come from the congregation itself, and not some higher organizational authority because there is none.
But since he's the CEO, he owns all property and assets so that could cause legal problems. Essentially, his congregation would probably have to leave and start a spinoff if they wouldn't want to be under his leadership but they couldn't take the church or any affiliated property or assets with them because they are all owned by TD Jakes. In a lot of cases like this, this is where you have a lot of corruption with pastors doing whatever they want to do, especially with money, because there is no higher authority to check them.
Would they be able to do this via the courts?
 

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
21,057
Reputation
5,125
Daps
83,930
Would who be able to do what?
To keep it simple, not trying to complicate this

But essentially how can the word of a man in a small piece of territory in the middle of Rome be enforced in America? You mentioned barring him entry, taking assets etc.
 
Top