Note I am not bashing anyone nor stating my views on anything just want some discussion.
If you voice your opinion that you do not agree with say Transgender lifestyles , you are called Homophobic and accused of spreading hate , and oppressing people.
But isn't being "attacked" for an opinion doing the same oppressing you are being accused for?
If I say Pedophiles are evil and their acts are wrong, but an alleged pedophile feels they are not hurting anyone and they love their underage sexual partner, and their underage "partner" "consented" to their sexual act, is the PEdophile not being oppressed?
Where do we draw the line on what is acceptable and what is not as a society?
As long as one is not inflicting physical harm on someone, can one truly say one person is more right than the other?
I am not comparing homosexuality to pedophilia by any means, I am just asking if someone does not agree with something why is it a problem in one case to honor their belief and in other cases it is not a problem?
If you voice your opinion that you do not agree with say Transgender lifestyles , you are called Homophobic and accused of spreading hate , and oppressing people.
But isn't being "attacked" for an opinion doing the same oppressing you are being accused for?
If I say Pedophiles are evil and their acts are wrong, but an alleged pedophile feels they are not hurting anyone and they love their underage sexual partner, and their underage "partner" "consented" to their sexual act, is the PEdophile not being oppressed?
Where do we draw the line on what is acceptable and what is not as a society?
As long as one is not inflicting physical harm on someone, can one truly say one person is more right than the other?
I am not comparing homosexuality to pedophilia by any means, I am just asking if someone does not agree with something why is it a problem in one case to honor their belief and in other cases it is not a problem?

The relegation of the proliferation is the repository. 



