“Time is of the essence because people are casting votes in primaries and caucuses,” Sibley said,
according to U.S. News.
"I believe this information is relevant to that political discourse."
“Denying Sibley a hearing deprives the People of the information they may deem material to the exercise of their electoral franchise," he wrote in his application for a stay of restraining order, according to WTOP.
Sibley threatened to release information about Palfrey's customers if the Supreme Court won't hear his request.
----
“To be clear, if Sibley is not allowed to file his Motion to Modify the Restraining Order and thereafter does not promptly receive a fair and impartial hearing on that Motion, he will justifiably consider the Restraining Order void as a result of being denied such a hearing by the District Court, Circuit Court and now this Court,” a footnote in Sibley's Supreme Court filing says.
“In that event, Sibley will simply release publicly the Verizon Wireless Subpoena Return records containing the names and addresses of eight hundred fifteen Washington, D.C. clients of the D.C. Madam’s escort service,” Sibley wrote.