Trump bans transgenders from military

.... do u support this decision?

  • Agree

    Votes: 134 58.5%
  • Disagree

    Votes: 95 41.5%

  • Total voters
    229

qnsfinest

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
6,842
Reputation
1,852
Daps
32,228
Reppin
Queens, NY
There are plenty of career fields in all the branches where you can have the Transgender serve if having them in combat was an issue. And don't give me that bullshyt that they are mentally ill or mentally unstable when so many people who already serve are mentally ill and unstable, when was the last time you saw a transgender commit a crime or go on a crazy killing spree. I don't care if the person inprocessing to the base in transgender or the person who works in the finance office, or cooks or works in something administrative.
 

Rell Lauren

Banned
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
29,000
Reputation
-2,917
Daps
111,822
Reppin
NYC
It just isn't one shot. It is a daily regimen of complex medication to alter their hormones.
 
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
448
Reputation
175
Daps
2,478
Reppin
NY
There are plenty of career fields in all the branches where you can have the Transgender serve if having them in combat was an issue. And don't give me that bullshyt that they are mentally ill or mentally unstable when so many people who already serve are mentally ill and unstable, when was the last time you saw a transgender commit a crime or go on a crazy killing spree. I don't care if the person inprocessing to the base in transgender or the person who works in the finance office, or cooks or works in something administrative.

If it is as a civilian that is perfectly fine. I do not think anyone would deny that. But not as a service member. You shouldn't be able to be in the service if you aren't capable in serving in combat. In the Army and Marines at least all members are required to have some sort of combat training yearly including weapons qualifications even if they are a cook, on desk duty or a non combat role. If you are un deployable you will be eventually discharge from the military.
 
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
448
Reputation
175
Daps
2,478
Reppin
NY
For those butt hurt about this bear in mind that I'm sure some liberal judge will reverse this decision. But ultimately, the commander in chief has almost full authority over the military.
 

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
125,468
Reputation
8,860
Daps
148,533
Reppin
Westcoast
If these people want to serve the military so bad, then they can accept their sex and stop playing dress up or chopping off their parts or injecting themselves with drugs. A lot of people had to make sacrifices to their personal preferences in order to serve, so why should they get any preference?
I don't serve a country dedicated to mowing down Black Americans from the comfort of their police cars. Navy tried to recruit me with all the fun incentives...hell nah.
 

qnsfinest

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
6,842
Reputation
1,852
Daps
32,228
Reppin
Queens, NY
If it is as a civilian that is perfectly fine. I do not think anyone would deny that. But not as a service member. You shouldn't be able to be in the service if you aren't capable in serving in combat. In the Army and Marines at least all members are required to have some sort of combat training yearly including weapons qualifications even if they are a cook, on desk duty or a non combat role. If you are un deployable you will be eventually discharge from the military.
Yes you are right, Marines and Army most are required combat training even if they never seen combat due to their job. But the AF and Navy do not have combat training for their non combative career fields, the cook the in the navy or AF has no combat training and will never see combat, but they do need to be qualified yearly on weapons, but still doesn't make them combat deployable.
 
Top