Trump IMPEACHED by the US House; US Senate Trial Allows No New Witnesses & Acquits Trump

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,186
Reputation
2,110
Daps
68,812
Reppin
Everywhere
Yeah, a lot of things are corrupt. That's not the angle of why it's sticking in your head though. It's because of Biden.

Trump has the levers of the entire government. He can pressure the UN to prosecute MBS for what he did to the journalist.

You really think he cares about Hunter or Ukrainian business if it wasn't connected to Biden trying to beat him?

This basically the same police tactic to arrest any group for looking suspicious. Then the jury's like...we'll what was he doing out at 2am?
You think I'm speaking on this because I think Trump is some honest actor? Trump is a fool who's used the office to enrich himself and his family. Biden is not off limits for discussion in spit e of that just like Hillary and her emails. It's all worth talking about if it's reported on correctly.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
332,723
Reputation
-34,436
Daps
637,543
Reppin
The Deep State
:ALERTRED::ALERTRED::ALERTRED::ALERTRED:



Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say
ABBK2BG6KEI6TPT7JTEFAF6DN4.jpg

President Trump told acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, center, to delay military aid to Ukraine this summer, administration officials said. (Carolyn Kaster/AP)
President Trump told his acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, to hold back almost $400 million in military aid for Ukraine at least a week before a phone call in which Trump is said to have pressured the Ukrainian president to investigate the son of former vice president Joe Biden, according to three senior administration officials.

Officials at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) relayed Trump’s order to the State Department and the Pentagon during an interagency meeting in mid-July, according to officials who spoke on the condition on anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. They explained that the president had “concerns” and wanted to analyze whether the money needed to be spent.


Administration officials were instructed to tell lawmakers that the delays were part of an “interagency process” but to give them no additional information — a pattern that continued for nearly two months, until the White House released the funds on the night of Sept. 11.

Trump’s order to withhold aid to Ukraine a week before his July 25 call with Volodymyr Zelensky is likely to raise questions about the motivation for his decision and fuel suspicions on Capitol Hill that Trump sought to leverage congressionally approved aid to damage a political rival. T
he revelation comes as lawmakers clash with the White House over a related whistleblower complaint made by an intelligence official alarmed by Trump’s actions.

Republican senators on the Senate Appropriations Committee said Sept. 12 that the aid to Ukraine had been held up while the Trump administration explored whether Zelensky, the country’s new president, was pro-Russian or pro-Western.
They said the White House decided to release the aid after Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) threatened to freeze $5 billion in Pentagon funding for next year unless the money for 2019 was distributed.

One senior administration official said Monday that Trump’s decision to hold back the funds was based on his concerns about there being “a lot of corruption in Ukraine” and that the determination to release the money was motivated by the fiscal year’s looming close on Sept. 30.

There was concern within the administration that if they did not spend the money, they would run afoul of the law, this official said, noting that, eventually, Trump gave the OMB’s acting director, Russell Vought, permission to release the money. The official emphatically denied that there was any link between blocking the aid and pressing Zelensky into investigating the Bidens, stating: “It had nothing to do with a quid pro quo.”

But on Capitol Hill, Democrats were calling for an investigation of what they viewed as potential “extortion,” as Sen. Robert Menendez (N.J.), the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s ranking Democrat, put it Monday. Trump, he said, is trying to “reshape American foreign policy” to advance his personal and political goals.

“I don’t think it really matters … whether the president explicitly told the Ukrainians that they wouldn’t get their security aid if they didn’t interfere in the 2020 elections,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “There is an implicit threat in every demand that a United States president makes of a foreign power. … That foreign country knows that if they don’t do it, there are likely to be consequences.”

Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July 25 conversation with Zelensky was “a perfect phone call.” He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.

But the Ukrainian leader was apparently left with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president “directly” expressed concerns at their meeting that “the aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence” of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.

Hunter Biden served for nearly five years on the board of Burisma, Ukraine’s largest private gas company, whose owner came under scrutiny by Ukrainian prosecutors for possible abuse of power and unlawful enrichment. Hunter Biden was not accused of any wrongdoing in the investigation. As vice president, Joe Biden pressured Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who Biden and other Western officials said was not sufficiently pursuing corruption cases — at one point, threatening to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees. At the time, the investigation into Burisma was dormant, according to former Ukrainian and U.S. officials.

Trump’s allies have frequently said he has been better about distributing military aid, and specifically lethal aid, to Ukraine than his predecessor. Yet according to Democratic and Republican aides, no administration has withheld funds as long and as mysteriously as the Trump administration did this year since the United States began helping Ukraine fend off Russian-backed separatists in the country’s eastern provinces.

Congressional officials were notified twice this year, on Feb. 28 and again on May 23, that the administration intended to release large tranches of military aid to Ukraine. Congress approved two large pots of military aid for Ukraine during fiscal 2019: $250 million, to be managed by the Pentagon, for equipment such as sniper rifles, counter-artillery radar systems, ammunition and grenade launchers; and $141 million, to be funneled through the State Department, for maritime security, NATO interoperability and various initiatives to help Ukraine’s military fend off Russian aggression.

Despite those notifications, the money was not transmitted until this month.

According to administration officials, discussions about Ukrainian aid began in June. Withholding aid from foreign governments is something the president has frequently requested, such as with Central American countries when he believed they were not doing their part to help the United States with immigrants amassing at the southern border.

Former national security adviser John Bolton wanted to release the money to Ukraine because he thought it would help the country while curtailing Russian aggression. But Trump has said he was primarily concerned with corruption.

“It’s very important to talk about corruption,” Trump told reporters. “If you don’t talk about corruption, why would you give money to a country that you think is corrupt?”

Besides Bolton, several other administration officials said they did not know why the aid was being canceled or why a meeting was not being scheduled.

The decision was communicated to State and Defense officials on July 18, officials familiar with the meeting said.

By mid-August, lawmakers were acutely aware that the OMB had assumed all decision-making authority from the Defense and State departments, and was delaying the distribution of the aid through a series of short-term notices. Several congressional officials questioned whether the OMB had the legal authority to direct federal agencies not to spend money that Congress had already authorized, aides said.

Spokespeople for the Pentagon and the State Department declined to comment.

Mid-August is also when a whistleblower from the intelligence community filed a complaint regarding Trump and Ukraine to Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. Atkinson informed the House and Senate intelligence committees of the complaint’s existence Sept. 9 — the same day three House committees launched an investigation to determine whether Trump and his lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, had improperly pushed Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.

Capitol Hill has not been briefed on the details of the whistleblower complaint, on orders of the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, who after consulting with the Justice Department and the White House declined to transmit the complaint to lawmakers. On Thursday, Maguire is set to testify publicly before the House Intelligence Committee and in a closed session before the Senate Intelligence Committee.



@88m3 @ADevilYouKhow @wire28 @dtownreppin214
@dza @wire28 @BigMoneyGrip @Dameon Farrow @re'up @Blackfyre @Cali_livin @NY's #1 Draft Pick @Skyfall
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,760
Reputation
7,272
Daps
151,736
Reppin
CookoutGang
Tbh before they even begin on Ukraine, I want to know what Dems have in plan to respond to Mueller not clearing Trump on Obstruction.
There is no plan. Not enough dems are calling for representatives demanding they speak out in favor of it.

People yelled and screamed that Dems lost in 2016 because they spent too much time talking about Trump and not issues.

Pelosi is basically giving those people a big :troll: job.
 

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
82,357
Reputation
12,194
Daps
325,032
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
If the Pres of Ukraine smart and seeing Trump is in a world of shyt over that extortion aid, that’s their leverage to get trump out the paint seeing that he need them to help him with Biden..

Seems like Warran will be the nom instead :troll:
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,480
Daps
37,719
This and his claims that Biden should be getting the chair are bad enough. We’re at the point that he’s trying to incite and justify the murder of his opposition. It’s been ongoing treason from his since day one.
But let’s not talk about impeachment. It may ruffle some potential Republican voters feathers.
 
Last edited:

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
26,183
Reputation
6,178
Daps
118,659
Corruption isn't illegal in alot of cases. I'm not saying investigate Biden but the media wish it not be discussed because Trump brought it up.
Investigate Biden's son if you have evidence, there is no evidence Biden is involved, but you immediately appropriate guilt to him.
 

Json

Superstar
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
13,925
Reputation
1,770
Daps
43,010
Reppin
Central VA
You think I'm speaking on this because I think Trump is some honest actor? Trump is a fool who's used the office to enrich himself and his family. Biden is not off limits for discussion in spit e of that just like Hillary and her emails. It's all worth talking about if it's reported on correctly.

You're on a mostly black/minority board. I don't think more than 1% of us are Trump supporters or think he’s honest.

I'm saying the reason you think there's something dishonest on the Biden is cause of the fact the question keeps getting asked. It's a psychological trick.

Like in high school, a girl could get labeled a slut just based on the accusation. It doesn't matter what she actually did(wether just kissing, nothing, or anything else). Just the fact the rumor is spread and people keep mentioning it makes it true no matter who started it. So you have Trump, Pompeo, and Rudy all going on not actually accusing Biden and Hunter or anything concrete, but just saying there's something corrupt about them which is a vague accusation that's just mean to seed into people's brains.

Like you said. Corrupution doesn't illegal. But it's part of the trick to let voters fill in the blanks on what they want vs something that could be disputed.

They've done this several times like with Bill and Loretta Lynch on the plane. Two people who know each other speaking becomes something nefarious. The two FBI agents in relationship not liking him. Meanwhile, Trump calling for Ukraine to interfere is just normal and shouldn't be questioned?
 
Last edited:
Top