Trump: No transgender people in U.S. military; 12/11 Pentagon will allow them to serve

Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-574
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
What unique benefits are giving to a military serving Transgender?
What unique benefits are giving to a military serving heterosexual Black male?
What unique benefits are giving to a military serving gay Asian woman ?
What unique benefits are giving to a military serving Muslim male?

It seems like 3 of the 4 types of military personals are giving mostly the same benefits, despite being different
 

mag357

Superstar
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
18,578
Reputation
45
Daps
57,395
:snoop: initially i just thought he worded it terribly

I thought he meant that if you wanted to be trans you couldnt use the militaries resources to do it, which makes sense imo, that shyt takes a lot of surgeries and im assuming soldiers wouldn't be in a healthy mental or physical state in case of an emergency.



But just saying trans cant even join the shyt is dumb. If ANYONE is willing to sign away their lives and die for the countr just let em do it breh
Nah... Nope... No
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,489
Reputation
6,942
Daps
91,286
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
Transgender airman: ‘I would like to see them try to kick me out of my military’


CH7HBTVTOZGADHTJG3UHEYSGI4.jpg


After President Trump’s surprise announcement Wednesday barring transgender people from serving “in any capacity“ in the military, one prominent transgender airman said he’s more determined than ever to continue serving in the Air Force.

“I would like to see them try to kick me out of my military,” Staff Sgt. Logan Ireland said in an interview with Air Force Times. “You are not going to deny me my right to serve my country when I am fully qualified and able and willing to give my life.”

Other transgender service members expressed the same determination to stay in uniform in interviews with Military Times.

“I will continue to report for duty in the uniform of the day until I am forced to receive my DD214” discharge papers, said Sgt. Jack Schuler a transgender man and Army reservist who is a chemical operations specialist. He previously served in the Marine Corps.

“I love serving this country and its people,” he said. ”I love being a part of this military family. My dream is to retire after a long career. I’m not going anywhere, anytime soon.”

A Marine military police officer who is a transgender man (he asked that his name not be used), pointed out that he’s served honorably through two deployments. He’s never endangered his comrades, he said, or made anyone else “conform to my world view.” All he asked for, he said, was the same respect he gave others.

“I have never described myself as trans; I’m a mother----ing Marine,” the corporal said. “That‘s all that matters. Don’t tarnish my title with your bigotry and fear of the unknown.”

It is unclear exactly how President Trump’s new policy will affect transgender people already serving. In a short statement, the Pentagon said it will work with the White House and “will provide revised guidance to the department in the near future.”

Ireland, a security forces airman who deployed to Kandahar, Afghanistan, has been one of the most prominent transgender people in the military since he first shared his story publicly in 2015, three years after he began his transition to a man. Ireland also consulted with the Air Force last year as it drafted its guidance for how it will incorporate transgender airmen into its ranks.

Ireland is married to a transgender woman who serves in the Army, Cpl. Laila Villanueva, and the two appeared in a 2015 New York Times documentary, “Transgender, at War and in Love.”

Ireland, who is currently taking part in security forces training, said he had no idea at all that the change was coming. The policy change was especially a surprise, he said, considering the support Defense Department leadership has showed for allowing transgender people to serve.

“For the president to deny an able-bodied, fully qualified person the inherent right to raise their right hand and serve their country, potentially giving their own life for our freedoms, is doing this country an injustice,” Ireland said. “I would personally love for my president to meet me so I can tell him about myself, and the 15,500 honorably-serving transgender military members that are fighting right now for their liberties and their country.”

Schuler said that re-imposing a ban on transgender service members is likely to be counterproductive.

“For every qualified, fit to serve transgender person lost, there will have to be another person recruited and trained to replace them,” Schuler said. “Given the small number of transgender service members and the fact that not every transgender person opts for full or any medical reassignment, more will be spent imposing the ban than would be saved in treatment costs.”

Capt. Jacob Eleazer of the Kentucky Army National Guard said he hasn’t heard anything yet on whether his status will change.

“I imagine military leadership, like me, is still reacting to the news and trying to figure out exactly what bearing this is going to have,” Eleazer said, speaking for himself and not for the military. “I remain hopeful that it’s possible that with some wisdom and guidance that things could change, but I’m kind of an optimist, so we’ll see how it rolls out.”

Eleazer, who is a doctoral candidate in psychology, hopes to secure a military clinical internship as part of his plan to become a military psychologist. However, transferring to a medical position is technically considered a new commission, so Eleazer has been waiting for the Defense Department to release its policy on inducting transgender service members.

Eleazer said his unit has been supportive of him serving as an openly transgender soldier, and recently returned from annual training with his unit.

“My commander set a very clear tone of dignity and respect,” Eleazer said. “My gender marker is not updated in the military medical system even though it’s been updated on my birth certificate for years now. Because of that, I still have to follow female standards and female billeting and my unit has been very accommodating to help figure out solutions to that when we’ve been in the field. It’s been great working with them, to be honest.”

Over the past year, as the Air Force adjusted to the new policy allowing transgender people to serve, it even began publicizing the stories of some transgender airmen. In a commentary posted on Nellis Air Force Base’s website June 30, Senior Airman Irene Nelson, an air traffic controller, described how she came to realize she was a transgender woman and made her transition.

And last November, Offut Air Force Base posted a profile of Staff Sgt. Ashleigh Buch, an instructor with the 338th Combat Training Squadron there, about her transition and the strain of living in the closet.

“When you have to serve and you aren’t able to be yourself, it’s going to dampen your spirit,” Buch said in that profile. “If you’re going to have to constantly worry about being outed, or constantly worry about your safety or your health — and do that all in silence — you’re never going to be as good as you could be.”

Ireland emphasized the wide variety of roles transgender people serve today in the Air Force.

“We have pilots, we have doctors, we have combat medics, we have security forces members like myself,” Ireland said. “We are everywhere in the military, and for our president to not have a military member’s back that is willing to die for him, blows my mind. And it just makes me very motivated today to continue my training.”

Transgender airman: ‘I would like to see them try to kick me out of my military’
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,489
Reputation
6,942
Daps
91,286
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
The total number of transgender individuals in the military is very low.

In 2014, there were an estimated 1,300 to 6,600 transgender individuals serving in the military, according to the RAND report.

That year, there were more than 1.3 million active service members, meaning that transgender individuals made up between 0.1 and 0.5 percent of the total active military, according to the report.

In the Selected Reserve (the non-active portion of the military), the RAND study estimated there were between 830 and 4,160 transgender individuals in 2014.

Not all transgender service members seek transition-related treatments.

A subset of the total number of transgender individuals in the military choose to engage in any type of procedures to transition to a gender that differs from the one they were assigned at birth, according to the RAND report. And even among those who choose to do so, the transition may be "primarily social" and involve no medical treatments.

When medical treatments are involved, they can include hormone therapy, hair removal and for some, surgery.

Transition-related treatment would disrupt less than 0.1 percent of the active military.

The RAND researchers estimated that between 29 and 129 active-duty transgender individuals would seek transition-related treatment that could disrupt their ability to deploy each year. This estimate represents less than 0.1 percent of the total number of people in the military.

In comparison, in 2015, approximately 50,000 active-duty military personnel, or 14 percent, in the Army alone were ineligible to deploy for various legal, medical or administrative reasons, according to the RAND report.

Gender transition-related health care costs are "relatively low."

Though Trump cites "tremendous medical costs" related to transgender individuals serving in the military, the RAND study estimated these costs would fall between $2.4 million and $8.4 million each year.

These costs would increase overall military health care spending by an "exceedingly small" amount, the report said. Between 0.04 and 0.13 percent of the approximately $6 billion spent in 2014 would go to transition-related health care costs, the researchers found.

Foreign militaries can offer insights.

In 2016, 18 countries allowed transgender individuals to serve openly in the military, according to the RAND report.

For their report, the researchers focused specifically on four countries — Australia, Canada, Israel and the United Kingdom — and found that none of these countries' militaries "reported a negative impact on the operational effectiveness, operational readiness or cohesion of the force."

Originally published on Live Science.

Transgender Military Ban: 5 Facts That Rebut Trump’s Claims
 

bigrice25

DUUUVAAAAAALL!!!
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
736
Reputation
90
Daps
935
Reppin
DUUUVAAAAAAAAAL
Im in the military,
i have no problem with it. I just figured most of them will have a hard time getting through MEPs (where you get your initial physical). But then again.... I've served with some maladjusted individuals who would be viewed as "normal" otherwise....
 

Eddy Gordo

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
4,148
Reputation
615
Daps
13,934
As someone who is currently in the military. This is foolishness. It's the military. As long as someone is equipped to do the job and meets the standard. Let em:yeshrug:

The dudes arguing against this either haven't been in the military or mad reaching. The military offers one cosmetic (quality of life) surgery during a career. Some females get boob jobs or ass implants, a chief I met got hair plugs, hell one dude got a penile enlargement done. Transitions I believe fall under the same category. I would have to check regs.

Also stop with deployment and getting out of work arguments. Anybody who been in knows you go get a mental health evaulation before and after every deployment. And we all know that one Sgt who is on a profile 6 months out of the year or the chick who spent 3 years of a four year enlistment pregnant. Where's your beef with them?:ehh:
 
Top