Trump orders USAID to be put under U.S. Department of State (DOS) amidst foreign aid freeze; Marco Rubio confirms 83% of USAID cut; thousands fired

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
91,512
Reputation
3,801
Daps
163,278
Reppin
Brooklyn
We have to deal with political realities.
Someone saying we need to stop sending money over seas compared to another saying we have to keep sending it will win an election 9 times out of 10 in this climate.

I support foreign aid but democrats should not be out here defending it. Once dems get back into power some of the programs can be reinstated.

sissy
 

Liu Kang

KING KILLAYAN MBRRRAPPÉ
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
14,036
Reputation
5,574
Daps
30,776




28 year old DOGE staffer





These sound like DRL projects

SMH, boasting about cutting million dollar projects on a trillion dollar budget.

We have to deal with political realities.
Someone saying we need to stop sending money over seas compared to another saying we have to keep sending it will win an election 9 times out of 10 in this climate.

I support foreign aid but democrats should not be out here defending it. Once dems get back into power some of the programs can be reinstated.
It's simple maths. Cutting projects that represent at most 1/100,000 of the US budget is doing nothing but grandstanding.

This is not worth it for the US in terms of soft power because sending a couple of millions a year of aid to get in good graces of a country that you can then sell your products to, pays itself at the end.

And even if you don't sell to them at least it grants you either leverage or good will to advance your agenda.

That's the messaging the Dems have to focus on and then show how to REALLY cut waste by targeting wasteful parts of the budget that are meaningful.
 

barese

Pro
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
763
Reputation
162
Daps
1,427
SMH, boasting about cutting million dollar projects on a trillion dollar budget.


It's simple maths. Cutting projects that represent at most 1/100,000 of the US budget is doing nothing but grandstanding.

This is not worth it for the US in terms of soft power because sending a couple of millions a year of aid to get in good graces of a country that you can then sell your products to, pays itself at the end.

And even if you don't sell to them at least it grants you either leverage or good will to advance your agenda.

That's the messaging the Dems have to focus on and then show how to REALLY cut waste by targeting wasteful parts of the budget that are meaningful.
That soft power was an important tool to get to the dollar as the world reserve.

Without it, it will be easier to export, but Americans will have to pay greater interests in their economy, probably more than the millions for the foreign aid...
 

barese

Pro
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
763
Reputation
162
Daps
1,427
Instead of USAID, foreign countries will now get Trump towers lol



In case of Serbia, USAID was helping immigrants situation, so that was bound to be canceled...
 
Last edited:

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
56,298
Reputation
13,230
Daps
206,469
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
Instead of USAID, foreign countries will now get Trump towers lol



In case of Serbia, USAID was helping immigrants situation, so that was bound to be canceled...

Let’s not fool ourselves into thinking there wouldn’t be Harris Towers in Qatar right now if we were unlucky enough to have her win the presidency. The dems are no angels in all of this…
 
Top