Trump's full history of racism

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

I mean, I hate trump as a person, and politician...but like 70% of these aren't direct quotes.

And that was my point..There is no hard evidence of this "racism"..look how many people like have been caught on tape or video...donald sterling.mel gibson,michael richards....

... Trump has been a celebrity for 30 years and nobody has any solid proof..what are the odds of that??

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Then i take my talents elsewhere...if i cant get intelligent civil discourse here ill find it somewhere else...

But you dont get that privilege to tell me shyt...... cos ive never seen you post anything worthwhile...

You're not interested in intelligent discourse. You're an intellectual dishonest alt-right loon. You cite alt-right sources and use white supremacist talking points. Nobody should waste their time with you.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

You're not interested in intelligent discourse. You're an intellectual dishonest alt-right loon. You cite alt-right sources and use white supremacist talking points. Nobody should waste their time with you.

Says the idiot who has inhaled their worldview straight out of Arianna Huffingtons rear end....Youre a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy

When you lack a solid foundation on fact then your ideology is unsound at the root....no wonder you have yet to debunk a thing ive said

 

[Billy Ocean]

Perfect example of the kind of "#lower learning" posts you make....You have no idea where i post or what im a member of but youre just foaming at the mouth

Who's foaming at the mouth?

Your behavior on here is consistent with someone who would post on those sites.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Says the idiot who has inhaled their worldview straight out of Arianna Huffingtons rear end....Youre a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy

When you lack a solid foundation on fact then your ideology is unsound at the root....no wonder you have yet to debunk a thing ive said

In my time posting here, I've never seen you post anything of substance. Or from a legit source. You're a carbon copy of a /pol/ poster. And your Breitbart-esque posts are transparent.

For instance, someone posts something from a source that actually uses fact-checking, and if you're not deflecting, you misconstrue their argument and try to turn it around on them. You do this because you're not here for genuine discussion. You cry for intelligent discourse, but the content of your posts prove that you're at best - a troll - and at worst - well...

 

[Billy Ocean]

I mean, I hate trump as a person, and politician...but like 70% of these aren't direct quotes.

Nobody with knowledge of Trump's history needs to even look at that list

The dude posts undeniably false racist statistics on his Twitter and just recently was claiming a judge wouldn't be able to do his job correctly because he was Mexican. What more does anyone need?

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

Who's foaming at the mouth?

Your behavior on here is consistent with someone who would post on those sites.

Now youre some kind of psycho analyst??

at the white supremacist boards you're a member of.

before you were a psychic

What will you transform into next?? Stay tuned...actually i wont..this is boring me...im done

 

[88m3]

Trump has a history of racism.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Yep. Dude was sued for his racist rental practices and has a well documented history of disparaging comments on minorities.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

In my time posting here, I've never seen you post anything of substance. Or from a legit source. You're a carbon copy of a /pol/ poster. And your Breitbart-esque posts are transparent.

For instance, someone posts something from a source that actually uses fact-checking, and if you're not deflecting, you misconstrue their argument and trying to turn it around on them. You do this because you're not here for genuine discussion. You cry for intelligent discourse, but the content of your posts prove that you're at best - a troll - and at worst - well...

Im flattered you know so much about me...I barely recollect you ..your homoerotic screen-name does seems familiar...or perhaps that was a title of some gay adult entertainment DVD poster i saw somewhere..its all a blur.

I honestly do not recollect a single post youve made that made me cogitate or shift my perspective..thats truly sad because it means that even among the liberals as challenged as they are you are a truly tepid intellect

Its just pathetic to point out such things as problematic sources post facto...why didnt you speak up when you had the chance in that conversation..maybe you were right ,maybe i could have corrected the error

Bringing it up now shows how little the truth matters to you..its all about feelings and personality struggles and fitting in with the rest of your liberal herd

baaaa baaabye for now...i got shyt to do

 

[SirReginald]

@JudgeJoeGorilla

I'm just voting for him because I'd know he'd be gridlocked by congress and will only be a 1-term president. After that vote, I'll be going back to work for progressive causes and voting for them locally and state. Plus, I do agree with his Anti-TPP stance. Still, if it was Bernard Sander Vs Trump, then I'd pick Bernie

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

I'm just voting for him because I'd know he'd be gridlocked by congress and will only be a 1-term president. After that vote, I'll be going back to work for progressive causes and voting for them locally and state. Plus, I do agree with his Anti-TPP stance. Still, if it was Bernard Sander Vs Trump, then I'd pick Bernie

Too late then. We'd have lost the SC for a generation. Further, Trump isn't anti-TPP. And he just picked a running mate that's pro-TPP. You keep extolling the virtues of the 3rd party, so why not vote for Stein or Johnson instead of Trump?

 

[SirReginald]

Too late then. We'd have lost the SC for a generation. Further, Trump isn't anti-TPP. And he just picked a running mate that's pro-TPP. You keep extolling the virtues of the 3rd party, so why not vote for Stein or Johnson instead of Trump?

It's not that I have an issue with those two candidates. I'm focused on helping Clinton lose. Also, shouldn't have suppressed the damn voters. Stop with the SC excuse. Everyone knew the risk, but didn't care. I'll donate to Johnson or Stein though. Hopefully, they can shake things up for 2020. Where they can get federal funding for a start at having more than 2 parties which is flawed.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

It's not that I have an issue with those two candidates. I'm focused on helping Clinton lose. Also, shouldn't have suppressed the damn voters. Stop with the SC excuse. Everyone knew the risk, but didn't care. I'll donate to Johnson or Stein though. Hopefully, they can shake things up for 2020. Where they can get federal funding for a start at having more than 2 parties which is flawed.

So, you don't actually care about real issues. I see now.

 

[Broke Wave]

It's not that I have an issue with those two candidates. I'm focused on helping Clinton lose. Also, shouldn't have suppressed the damn voters. Stop with the SC excuse. Everyone knew the risk, but didn't care. I'll donate to Johnson or Stein though. Hopefully, they can shake things up for 2020. Where they can get federal funding for a start at having more than 2 parties which is flawed.

The Supreme Court appointment is the most important part of this election. If a conservative wins, it'll be a conservative court for decades. There might be more than one appointment in the next 4 to 8 years. That's monumental.

A liberal court would not have given you many of the problems you now have in America, especially citizens united.