TV heads I need help

PimpHandStrong

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
4,755
Reputation
930
Daps
6,555
Reppin
Decatur where its greater
5076427897044992.png
Rtings gives the 6400 series a 6.8 out of 10:patrice:

LG 2015 TVs: Reviews and Prices
 

PimpHandStrong

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
4,755
Reputation
930
Daps
6,555
Reppin
Decatur where its greater

scarlxrd

Underground
Supporter
Joined
Nov 8, 2014
Messages
13,861
Reputation
7,809
Daps
54,609
5 reasons why you don't need 4K yet:

1. There's Not Much Content.

Netflix launched its latest binge-worthy series, Daredevil, last Friday, in 4K. It was shot to take advantage of not only 4K but OLED's superior ability to display dark shadow detail so precisely. Netflix, along with other streaming services such as Amazon, YouTube and M-Go, are offering 4K content.

Check out all available 4K content in this comprehensive guide by my buddy David Katzmaier on CNET. As you'll see, there's not a whole lot of 4K content out there yet.

But don't expect to see 4K content broadcast -- ever. Which means no 4K sports broadcasts, for instance.

The biggest cache of 4K content will be coming later this year and early next year when the first 4K UHD Blu-ray players appear from Panasonic, Samsung, LG, et al. All new programs and movies are being shot in 4K, and Hollywood studios will likely re-master their catalogs in 4K so they can sell you new 4K copies of movies you've already bought three or four times in the last 20 years.

Yes, all UHDs offer upscaling -- blowing up HTDV to 4K. But results vary wildly from one UHD to another.

Bottom line: there'll be a lot more 4K content to stream and buy on Blu-ray in about a year from now.

2. You Won't See the Difference.

Even if you could access the few 4K programs available, it's an open question whether you'll be able to see the difference between UHD (4K) and HDTV (2K).

In the HDTV world, it's impossible to detect the difference between 1080p and 720p resolution on HTDVs smaller than 50 inches watched from a normal viewing distance.

Check out this image of "Sunday in the Park" by pointillist painter George Seurat. Viewed up close, you can see the points. Shrink the picture and move further back, and the points fade to create a solid image.

The only way to detect the dot detail improvement from HDTV to UHD is to either get closer or get a much larger screen -- or both. Only gamers who sit super close to their UHDs will be able to detect 4K's detail superiority, assuming the game is in 4K. But for those of us watching House of Cards on 60-65-inch sets sitting 6-8 feet away? It'll be really hard to tell the difference between 4K and 2K, certainly not a difference worth the UHD price premium.

Which leads us to...

3. They're Too Expensive.

Duh.

You can buy a really good 60-inch HDTV for less than $1,000.

Only slightly larger UHDs are priced anywhere from four to nine times higher.

For instance, LG's 65-inch Prime UF9500 LCD UHD, which uses a color-boosting technology called Wide Color Gamut (WGC), is priced at $4,500.

Samsung's new flagship 65-inch JS9500 quantum dot UHD set is priced at $6,000. And LG's droolable 65-inch EG9600 OLED UHD will sell for an instantly mouth-drying $9,000.

As with all electronics, prices on UHDs will begin to drop as other suckers...er, I mean customers (slight error) buy current UHD models.

4. They're Curved.

Remember item No. 2 on this list about how hard it is to tell the difference between big-screen HDTVs and UHDs? The same problem exists at your local Best Buy. Why would you buy an expensive UHD if you can't tell the difference between it and the HDTV next to it?

In order to differentiate UHDs from HDTVs in stores, UHD makers have curved their sets so you can tell the difference. There is no other reason why UHDs are curved -- pure marketing gimmickry.

Oh, the UHD makers and your pimply sales person will wax poetically about how the curvature helps envelope you in the on-screen action and blah blah blah...

Bull hockey. It's the whole perception-is-reality thing. The curvature looks different, you want something new and shiny, so you believe the curvature is an improvement.

It isn't. In fact, the curvature, especially on an LCD UHD, cuts down an LCD's already limited viewing angle and increases the reflective glare from ambient lighting sources.

Plus, there's a bit of weird irony to the whole curved TV bit. For years, TV makers have been striving to make their TVs as flat as possible; OLED TVs are an astounding 4mm thin. But curving just makes them fat again. WTF?

I'm hoping LG (since I want an OLED set) will offer flat models next year.

5. The HDR Conundrum.

UHD is still somewhat a work in progress. This year's models still don't conform to a number of pending, still in development or just announced highly-technical upgrades such as HEVC, HDCP 2.2, HDR and HDMI 2.0a.

For the average viewer, the subtle differences these H-acronyms upgrades will provide are admittedly hardly earth-shaking or even noticeable, with the singular exception of HDR, High Dynamic Range.

HDR brings a demonstrably higher degree of color, both in intensity and the number of colors and how accurately they're displayed. You can see the difference HDR makes on photos you snap on an iPhone with HDR switched on or off.

Dolby Vision, Dolby's HDR TV technology, will be included in Vizio's just-announced 65- and 105-inch Reference Series models, the first UHDs with HDR (no pricing or availability has been announced).

In a demo at the Vizio event, the improvements HDR deliver in detail and depth are startling. Not only are colors brighter and more life-like via HDR, but image aspects heretofore undisplayable because of the limitations of LCD sets and, to a lesser extent, plasma displays, can now be seen.

Get the OLED
 

Super Future Luther King Jr.

You Deserve It
Supporter
Joined
Dec 28, 2014
Messages
5,367
Reputation
4,130
Daps
19,066
Reppin
Rose Town
What model though. I'm sure you realize just because its a 60in and UHD doesn't mean it will stand up next to those two particular TVs

Nah no doubt breh, really I was just trippin on the price points he was saying, I wasn't even thinking about quality

I honestly don't know shyt bout TVs

:russ:

Was just cappin cuz I felt like $875 was a lick for me
 
Top