Twitter Nukes Alt-Ryte Accounts (Facebook is next)

[Dameon Farrow]

What are you doing on here? You cornball infiltrators are so obvious

st0rmfr0nt Troopers in the house. They are mad obvious.

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

I don't want to reason with them...I want them to stand by their ideals and be brave enough to defend prejudice and bigotry.

Let them show us who they are so we can judge them for their idiocy accordingly. This shyt isn't about differences in opinion, it's straight up a subsection of this country whose backbone is hate and oppression.

Unless they got something to hide...which they do...

They can still come out the shadows on their own social media platform

That's them free market principles!!

 

[88m3]

nothing of value will be lost

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I'm not tatter tot, It's all good in the neighborhood. His question was is it to late. The answer it's been to late since Hillary stole the primary from Bernie. If Hillary was ready to lead he dems she would be trying to fix this mess she made right now. Not disappear.

Hillary. Did not. Steal. Anything. From Bernie.


People voted.


Bernie lost.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

nothing of value will be lost

These people have laughed at us for...years at this point questioning how psy-ops and info wars take place.


NOW we're taking it seriously

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

And who determines "hate speech?"
Censorship of ideas, (however trash thry are) is never a good thing.

all i know is it isn't protected by the first amendment, so yea, when something gets tagged as hate speech, people can gladly shut you the fukk up

 

[DonKnock]

And who determines "hate speech?"
Censorship of ideas, (however trash thry are) is never a good thing.

There is a history of Supreme Court cases that outline what constitutes hate speech.

Twitter is private though and can dertermine whatever they want.


Who knows, we might see a sudden rise in cac programmers in response to this

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

Twitter is a private company, they obligated to do everything within legal bounds to protect their shareholders interests.

I dont think theyve protected shareholder interests since about April 2015.

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

all i know is it isn't protected by the first amendment, so yea, when something gets tagged as hate speech, people can gladly shut you the fukk up

There is no hate speech exception in the first amendment.

 

[DonKnock]

There is no hate speech exception in the first amendment.

Supreme Court case lawEdit
Some limits on expression were contemplated by the framers and have been read into the Constitution by the Supreme Court (SCOTUS). In 1942, Justice Frank Murphy summarized the case law: "There are certain well-defined and limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise a Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or 'fighting' words – those which by their very utterances inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."[84]

 

[WhereIsTheLove]

There is a history of Supreme Court cases that outline what constitutes hate speech.

Twitter is private though and can dertermine whatever they want.


Who knows, we might see a sudden rise in cac programmers in response to this

They're still public. But I'm sure their shareholders agree with this decision.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

They didn't nuke the main ones.

 

[WhereIsTheLove]

They didn't nuke the main ones.

Are you seeing the ones I'm still seeing out there?

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

Supreme Court case lawEdit
Some limits on expression were contemplated by the framers and have been read into the Constitution by the Supreme Court (SCOTUS). In 1942, Justice Frank Murphy summarized the case law: "There are certain well-defined and limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise a Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or 'fighting' words – those which by their very utterances inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."[84]

A twitter riot doesnt qualify as an immediate breach of peace...unless they specifically instruct someone to attack or cause trouble IRL at a certain time and place