DonKnock
KPJ Gonna Save Us
They're still public. But I'm sure their shareholders agree with this decision.
Private in the sense that they are not taking government money.
They're still public. But I'm sure their shareholders agree with this decision.
For a free market man, you don't really believe in the free market.
FREE is the operative word in free-market...Twitter is actually working against their own financial interests by getting political and eliminating potential clients.A twitter riot doesnt qualify as an immediate breach of peace...unless they specifically instruct someone to attack or cause trouble IRL at a certain time and place
proving my point bruh“Diplomacy. F---ing fools. I hate you all. I want to bomb every one of your voting booths and your general areas.”
“My life goal is to assassinate Trump. Don’t care if I serve infinite sentences. That man deserves to decease existing.”

proving my point bruh
specific threat,specific means against specific target...all that was missing was a specific time
If all he did was state his hate for a certain person or group then there would be no case![]()
FREE is the operative word in free-market...Twitter is actually working against their own financial interests by getting political and eliminating potential clients.
How does that prove your point? Do you think there were no similar statements made like the ones I posted against Obama?
You think that should be allowed to continue?

Supreme Court case lawEdit
Some limits on expression were contemplated by the framers and have been read into the Constitution by the Supreme Court (SCOTUS). In 1942, Justice Frank Murphy summarized the case law: "There are certain well-defined and limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise a Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or 'fighting' words – those which by their very utterances inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."[84]
big time....big big time.....a number of the guilty ones couldn't wait to open their mouth on the subject in this thread. I would @ them but I @ them plenty enough as it is.Need to cleanse here too.....
But still, why does answering the question have to be so difficult? What's wrong with answering a question?It's clear the alt right guys, the ardent supporters of racism, who pose questions like "Name one thing Bannon did that was racist", these are textbook techniques used to persuade people to their view, and cause chaos, dissension in general.
Black people know what racism is, particularly the subtle kind. And a lot of the white nationalists have spent years perfecting coded language that doesn't come off as racist. Which is why they disingenuously ask, "well what makes this racist, what did they say/do?" Yeah right.But still, why does answering the question have to be so difficult? What's wrong with answering a question?
big time....big big time.....a number of the guilty ones couldn't wait to open their mouth on the subject in this thread. I would @ them but I @ them plenty enough as it is.
Here's a pretty good indicator of a white supremacist....anyone haggling over what the first amendment means. The first amendment states that you can't be arrested by the government for what you say. That's it. That ends it. Anything else ie job loss public ridicule vile reaction by the public at large....is fair ass game.
These b*stards want the old days when they shytted on everybody to come back so badly...I swear if Trump did put up a bill to bring back slavery they wouldn't bat an eye.