U.S. Fighter Jets Scrambled to Intercept Russian Warplanes Near Alaska

that guy

Superstar
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
6,504
Reputation
828
Daps
21,325
So what Russia is doing is testing defenses.

Which is funny because if we’ve learned anything in the past few years, its that their military is greatly overestimated.
How so? They’re fighting against the entire NATO alliance and are still winning the war.

The most overestimated military is the United States who has lost every military conflict it’s been involved in since WW2 despite spending ungodly sums of money annually. Russia is fighting an actual standing army and is winning meanwhile the US spent $20 trillion and 20 years to fight goat herders in flip flops and lost :dead:
 

O.T.I.S.

The Monk & The Mercenary
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
90,371
Reputation
19,433
Daps
345,779
Reppin
The Truth
How so? They’re fighting against the entire NATO alliance and are still winning the war.

The most overestimated military is the United States who has lost every military conflict it’s been involved in since WW2 despite spending ungodly sums of money annually. Russia is fighting an actual standing army and is winning meanwhile the US spent $20 trillion and 20 years to fight goat herders in flip flops and lost :dead:

Already tells me you don’t know wtf you are talking about :mjlol:


Didn’t read the rest, shut your dumbass, don’t do shyt in life ass up nikka
 

Kunty McPhuck

Scust Szn has Returned
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,326
Reputation
4,345
Daps
71,092
Reppin
Books and Pencils

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
42,275
Reputation
19,338
Daps
156,922
Reppin
Humanity
How so? They’re fighting against the entire NATO alliance and are still winning the war.

The most overestimated military is the United States who has lost every military conflict it’s been involved in since WW2 despite spending ungodly sums of money annually. Russia is fighting an actual standing army and is winning meanwhile the US spent $20 trillion and 20 years to fight goat herders in flip flops and lost :dead:
Stfu.
NATO is giving Ukraine weapons and intel. Than is not the same as fighting all of NATO and Russia is not winning this "special military operation".

Did the US get booted out of Afghanistan after 20 years? Yup, and the Soviets got booted out in 9 years.

:hula:
 

Biscayne

Ocean air
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
34,611
Reputation
5,998
Daps
105,501
Reppin
Cruisin’
How so? They’re fighting against the entire NATO alliance and are still winning the war.

The most overestimated military is the United States who has lost every military conflict it’s been involved in since WW2 despite spending ungodly sums of money annually. Russia is fighting an actual standing army and is winning meanwhile the US spent $20 trillion and 20 years to fight goat herders in flip flops and lost :dead:
This is definitely revisionist history. America was fight in an unconventional enemy in the taliban(as opposed to another nation), while also tryin to export diplomacy and “image”. So merely blowing shyt up and using its might, wasn’t gonna cut it. Unlike Russia who’s just waging a straight up conventional war against another nation.

You acting like Russia squabbling all of NATO at once. :dead:
 

DatNkkaCutty

Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
12,643
Reputation
4,710
Daps
83,001
Reppin
@ PA
How so? They’re fighting against the entire NATO alliance and are still winning the war.

The most overestimated military is the United States who has lost every military conflict it’s been involved in since WW2 despite spending ungodly sums of money annually. Russia is fighting an actual standing army and is winning meanwhile the US spent $20 trillion and 20 years to fight goat herders in flip flops and lost :dead:

While I somewhat agree with your statement, I would be HARD-PRESSED :comeon: to believe the US, doesn't have "cutting-edge" military tech, we just haven't wielded yet. We went to war with those "goat-herders" with our basic weaponry, IMO. I'm sure our military would "pull out" if we had to go to war with China or Russia. They're well aware of the numbers/population advantage those countries have, alone. Stealth came out in the 70s.

The Nuclear bomb, in the 40s or 50s. WTH do you think they've invented since then? Mind you...you see the military budget on a yearly basis. The US plays coy when it comes to real war, until it's time to go frfr. I'd argue all these unexplainable UFO sightings defying physics, (throughout and around the US), is unreleased tech, from our military.
 

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
15,582
Reputation
1,663
Daps
57,731
How so? They’re fighting against the entire NATO alliance and are still winning the war.

The most overestimated military is the United States who has lost every military conflict it’s been involved in since WW2 despite spending ungodly sums of money annually. Russia is fighting an actual standing army and is winning meanwhile the US spent $20 trillion and 20 years to fight goat herders in flip flops and lost :dead:
No theye not. :mjlol:
 

that guy

Superstar
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
6,504
Reputation
828
Daps
21,325
Supplying Ukraine weapons is not the same as supplying troops and conducting airstrikes.
What point are you attempting to make? The US supplied about half of all military supported for the Ukraine over the last few years while other NATO members supplied the rest. Are you saying because NATO countries don’t deploy their own military that means Russia isn’t fighting NATO as well? If the Ukraine was fighting on their own the war would have been over in a matter of months.

The US is supplying the Ukraine with weapons and most importantly intelligence, which is far more important that simple ammunition, not to mention the US special forces that are positioned like the ones that blew up the Nordstream pipeline.
 

KingTut

Green diamonds like a dill pickle
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
7,711
Reputation
3,051
Daps
55,010
Reppin
TX
What point are you attempting to make? The US supplied about half of all military supported for the Ukraine over the last few years while other NATO members supplied the rest. Are you saying because NATO countries don’t deploy their own military that means Russia isn’t fighting NATO as well? If the Ukraine was fighting on their own the war would have been over in a matter of months.

The US is supplying the Ukraine with weapons and most importantly intelligence, which is far more important that simple ammunition, not to mention the US special forces that are positioned like the ones that blew up the Nordstream pipeline.

With this logic Ukraine is fighting Russia, China, and North Korea.
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
29,116
Reputation
9,892
Daps
125,327
What point are you attempting to make? The US supplied about half of all military supported for the Ukraine over the last few years while other NATO members supplied the rest. Are you saying because NATO countries don’t deploy their own military that means Russia isn’t fighting NATO as well? If the Ukraine was fighting on their own the war would have been over in a matter of months.

The US is supplying the Ukraine with weapons and most importantly intelligence, which is far more important that simple ammunition, not to mention the US special forces that are positioned like the ones that blew up the Nordstream pipeline.


"The Ukraine"


Anyways, according to your logic "the Ukraine" is also fighting China, iran, and north Korea (actually that last one is kinda true).
 
Top