U.S. Fighter Jets Scrambled to Intercept Russian Warplanes Near Alaska

[Lucky_Lefty]

That’s all you could come up with

Better than that BS you came up with

 

[CopiousX]

So what Russia is doing is testing defenses.

Which is funny because if we’ve learned anything in the past few years, its that their military is greatly overestimated.

I think it's retaliation for Trump's Statements at the UN. China does similar passive aggressive sht in the Pacific to us allies.


Yesterday Trump told the world that Ukraine will get all its ceased land back because Putin wont listen to him. So its Less so testing, moreso throwing the geopolitical equivalent of a tantrum. This might even be a little payback for trump flying b2 bombers over putin during the Alaska meeting. I recall Putin did a similar thing after obama condemned his first invasion of crimea by doing 3 flyby(s) in a week over Alaska

But I think the biggest issue for America is that trump isnt a measured and calm person like Obama , so i fully expect him to act out in retaliation. You just know some foolishness will come out of DC tmrw.

 

[Mister Terrific]

What are you talking about? The US failed to overthrow the Cuban government in the notorious bay of pigs

The reason the Bay of Pigs failed was because Kennedy refused to send air support to a bunch of Cuban insurgents. You acting like it was a real invasion with the US military

If that’s an l is the US overthrowing half of South American governments a W?

Shut the fukk up Orc

The US lost the Korea war.

Last I checked South Korea still exists and that is literally the reason North Korea invaded was to overthrow the South Korean government:

The US lost in the Middle East.

Lost what?

Israel still hasn’t defeated Hamas

Israel wants a token Hamas force around so they have an excuse to continue destroying Palestine. This shows your low IQ in thinking that Hamas is anything but a political tool at this point.

and the Ukraine is losing to Russia.

Russia ain’t winning shyt goofy orc

 

[that guy]

This is definitely revisionist history. America was fight in an unconventional enemy in the taliban(as opposed to another nation), while also tryin to export diplomacy and “image”. So merely blowing shyt up and using its might, wasn’t gonna cut it. Unlike Russia who’s just waging a straight up conventional war against another nation.

You acting like Russia squabbling all of NATO at once.

Whats revisionist about America losing in Afghanistan? I don’t think you understand what that word means.

Saying Russia isn’t fighting all of NATO is like saying HAMAS isn’t fighting the United States.

Some you clearly never heard of a proxy war.

 

[Mister Terrific]

Whats revisionist about America losing in Afghanistan? I don’t think you understand what that word means.

US casualties 20 years Afghanistan killed and wounded 20,000

Russian casualties 3 years Ukraine 1,000,0000


And last I checked the taliban weren’t bombing US oil fields

 

[that guy]

You said the "entire NATO alliance" is fighting Russia. If the actual entire NATO alliance was fighting Russia, Russia would have lost after a week and your daddy Putin would be in dirt.

I said Russia is fighting against the entire NATO alliance. This is a factual statement by NATO itself

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_192648.htm#:~:text=NATO%20condemns%20in%20the%20strongest,fundamental%20right%20to%20self%2Ddefence.

“NATO is helping Ukraine defend itself by coordinating the delivery of aid from Allies and partners to Ukraine. Since 2022, NATO Allies have provided 99% of all military aid that Ukraine has received.”

NATO member countries are sending weapons, ammunition and many types of light and heavy military equipment to Ukraine, including anti-tank and air defence systems, artillery systems, munitions, drones, tanks and fighter jets. NATO's Article 5 security guarantee and its iron-clad promise of collective defence provides Allies with the confidence that they can send weapons to Ukraine without diminishing their own security. Furthermore, Allied forces are training Ukrainian troops to use this equipment. All of this is making a difference on the battlefield every day, helping Ukraine to uphold its right of self-defence, which is enshrined in the United Nations Charter. To coordinate all of these equipment donations and the training of Ukrainian forces, Allies have established NATO Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine (NSATU). Based in Wiesbaden, Germany, with three logistics hubs in the east of the Alliance, NSATU is staffed by nearly 700 personnel from Allied and partner countries.

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

Your logic makes no sense. The vast majority of all weapons and intelligence being used by the Ukraine is coming from NATO countries. Russia is not relying on imported chinese weapons and Iranian intelligence

it makes plenty of sense when you realize Russia relies on Iranian drones and Chinese electronics for their weapons.

And the u.s. won't let Ukraine use their weapons inside of Russia. Eldridge Colby pretty much denies them every time. The U.S. also stopped sharing intelligence on Russian targets within russia with Ukraine earlier this year. Thankfully U.S. aren't the only people with Intel.


The vast majority of strikes within Russia have been by Ukrainian built long range drones and cruise missiles.

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

US casualties 20 years Afghanistan killed and wounded 20,000

Russian casualties 3 years Ukraine 1,000,0000


And last I checked the taliban weren’t bombing US oil fields

1.1 million Russian casualties now

 

[Robbie3000]

This is definitely revisionist history. America was fight in an unconventional enemy in the taliban(as opposed to another nation), while also tryin to export diplomacy and “image”. So merely blowing shyt up and using its might, wasn’t gonna cut it. Unlike Russia who’s just waging a straight up conventional war against another nation.

You acting like Russia squabbling all of NATO at once.

What about Iraq? Vietnam? Korea?

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

What are you talking about? The US failed to overthrow the Cuban government in the notorious bay of pigs invasion. The US lost in Vietnam. The US lost the Korea war. The US lost in the Middle East. We spent $20 trillion and 20 years replacing the taliban with the taliban. We’re currently spending our money fighting 2 proxy wars in which the sides were supporting are losing. Israel still hasn’t defeated Hamas and the Ukraine is losing to Russia. We were ran out of Afghanistan and the result was a 95% drop in opium production almost immediately.

Once again, claiming the US has the strongest military because we spend the most money is an outdated 20th-century concept. Modern wars are wars of attrition, not brute force. You should have learned that during your time there.

The U.S. is playing politics when it comes to war. You act as if the U.S. can’t just carpet bomb those countries killing women and children. Second, the country’s true intentions of their wars are classified.

 

[desjardins]

Modern wars are wars of attrition, not brute force. You should have learned that during your time there.

It's asymmetric warfare

Vietnam and Afghanistan did it with guerrilla tactics
Russia is doing it now with drones instead of billion dollar jets

Even if the U.S "wins" it's still a L because it usually results in more instability but with a massive tax payer funded cost

 

[that guy]

it makes plenty of sense when you realize Russia relies on Iranian drones and Chinese electronics for their weapons.

And the u.s. won't let Ukraine use their weapons inside of Russia. Eldridge Colby pretty much denies them every time. The U.S. also stopped sharing intelligence on Russian targets within russia with Ukraine earlier this year. Thankfully U.S. aren't the only people with Intel.


The vast majority of strikes within Russia have been by Ukrainian built long range drones and cruise missiles.

It doesn’t makes sense because everyone relies on Chinese electronics including the Ukraine

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/world/europe/ukraine-russia-atacms-missiles.html?smid=url-share

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/17/politics/biden-authorizes-ukraine-missiles-russian-targets

 

[Samori Toure]

What are you talking about? The US failed to overthrow the Cuban government in the notorious bay of pigs invasion. The US lost in Vietnam. The US lost the Korea war. The US lost in the Middle East. We spent $20 trillion and 20 years replacing the taliban with the taliban. We’re currently spending our money fighting 2 proxy wars in which the sides were supporting are losing. Israel still hasn’t defeated Hamas and the Ukraine is losing to Russia. We were ran out of Afghanistan and the result was a 95% drop in opium production almost immediately.

Once again, claiming the US has the strongest military because we spend the most money is an outdated 20th-century concept. Modern wars are wars of attrition, not brute force. You should have learned that during your time there.

I am pretty sure by law the USA couldn't annex Cuba, otherwise they would have did it after defeating Spain in the Spanish American war. After all the USA did take Puerto Rico, Guam and the Phillipines, but they didn't take Cuba and they could have if they wanted to do it.

 

[Mister Terrific]

1.1 million Russian casualties now

Ukraine has switched to destroying Russian energy. It’s gonna get real interesting soon.


Might be why Trump switched positions recently. Intelligence had told them Russia is faltering.

 

[that guy]

The U.S. is playing politics when it comes to war. You act as if the U.S. can’t just carpet bomb those countries killing women and children. Second, the country’s true intentions of their wars are classified.

Where are you getting this propaganda from? The US used carpet bombing in Vietnam and Afghanistan killing hundreds of thousands of women and children and still lost both wars

Operation Menu - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Taliban Carpet-Bombed as Osama Hunt Narrows

abcnews.go.com