i hate “arguing” on the Coli because it’s silly. I mean no disrespect.
I respectfully disagree with you. Citing someone’s credentials is not proof that he has displayed of competence. Citing “fukkery” in other schools does not mean Umar is competent.
if you are (admittedly) “not sure if he has classroom experience” and “not sure what his administrative duties were” (your words) that’s not a very compelling argument toward saying someone is competent, purely based on their word.
i don’t doubt he’s intelligent, but I can’t tell you many points that he’s ever made that have shown “how intelligent he is”. And, the evidence I have seen: the way he berates people and ideas, how he carries himself, how vapid some of his points are, I can’t say that he is a beacon or great advertisement of his own intelligence.
Just my opinion.