Whether it's a disorder or not is irrelevant. What's relevant is that there is empirical AND anecdotal evidence that being gay is not a choice.
Being Gay Not a Choice: Science Contradicts Ben Carson
You don't tell your dikk to get hard when you see a naked woman or a fat ass.
1. So it's irrelevant if it's a disorder but you want us to think it's relevant because of a 2014 study( one study) says there is a possibility? Not fact.
2. The 1993 study was debunked in 99. BBC News | Sci/Tech | Doubt cast on 'gay gene'
3. The 2012 study( one study) suggest that a gene can be switched off and on by environmental factors. That basically debunks itself. That states that an outside influence can change the outcome. GMO foods, pollution, drugs, medication, etc.
4. These scientific studies never research sexual abuse, childhood trauma, mental stability, etc. Instead they look for a gene that isn't there.
5. What they don't tell you is that Animals are extremely territorial. Females are the most territorial. The males hump other males to show who runs things in the group( dominance). What they also don't say is that those animals who practice these things mainly are caged or captive animals. Some animals eat their poop, their young and their mates. Is that what Humans should do too?
6. In the Communism Goals presented in 1963 in front of in House of Representatives. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy." Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
Last edited:
Lloyd Banks showed and proved in that other thread that the only "Umar Johnson" who got that degree from that school is a married Arabian man, tho.
