I forgot this lawsuit was a thing.I forgot Drake was alive![]()
I forgot this lawsuit was a thing.I forgot Drake was alive![]()
You're not part of the culture."UMG Supports Black on black hate being the way they make their money" is what i read
When the diss song starts to take off like any other hit song it ends up being marketed like one too, just like Back to Back wasWhat part of rap beef is marketing the diss song like it's a promotional single?
"UMG Supports Black on black hate being the way they make their money" is what i read
When the diss song starts to take off like any other hit song it ends up being marketed like one too, just like Back to Back was
The labels pushing Back 2 Back was wrong too
Everyone called it weird and corporate back then.
Nothing wrong with pushing a diss song if it actually sounds like a hit song too, now if “Meet the grahams” was getting crazy marketing then you’d have a pointThe labels pushing Back 2 Back was wrong too
Everyone called it weird and corporate back then.
Artist has a hot. Label will push it. Drake ice reaped the benefit of that but now is on the other side of it.
That's business.![]()
When Pac dropped “Toss it up” it was a hit song and diss song too, and let’s not forget about all of the hit Eminem songs that were hits and full of disses
You could make a fair comparison here if Drake was putting wild allegations on Meek's jacket, but B2B was overall a relatively safe diss song that really only consists of clever jokes.
Nothing overly violent or crazy with exposals or allegations, which was probably all considered when the label decided to get behind the song.
Cmon man Toss It Up is nowhere close to Not Like Us in terms of disrespect lol
And Em and Interscope caught a lot of scrutiny for the songs he was putting out targeting different celebs.
no we didnt...we all collectively asked:The labels pushing Back 2 Back was wrong too
Everyone called it weird and corporate back then.
You could make a fair comparison here if Drake was putting wild allegations on Meek's jacket, but B2B was overall a relatively safe diss song that really only consists of clever jokes.
Nothing overly violent or crazy with exposals or allegations, which was probably all considered when the label decided to get behind the song.
And Drake would probably have a sound argument if he didn't respond with Heart 6. If that song actually had legs and Drake was the victor, this conversation doesn't happen because there is no UMG lawsuit.
Thst still doesn't negate the point that he'd have a better argument if he didn't respond. DSP availability or not, he responded. Hell, he responded approx 24 hours after Not Like Us dropped.Drake is arguing NLU became as big as it did because of how UMG pushed it.
The Heart 6 has nothing to do with anything here. It's not even available on DSPs.
What part of rap beef is marketing the diss song like it's a promotional single?