Nike had 95% market share and the vast majority of superstars. I don't think it hurts themJordans will do just fine.
But Nike has to be devastated that Under Armour has Curry and they don't.
They're missing out on massive sales because they lost him.Nike had 95% market share and the vast majority of superstars. I don't think it hurts them
yea they hurt..business dont like to concede groundsNike had 95% market share and the vast majority of superstars. I don't think it hurts them
They should have treated him better at that meeting, imagine the fire that would have been droppin![]()
when chef sees those new nike drops and thinks of how crazy those checks would be
how do you think he feels?jahahahaa
ua ain't fukking with the swoosh
*
I don't think so. They were tryna treat him like just another Nike athlete. Wasn't no signature shoe on the horizon or signature shirts.
Nike shytted on UA marketing wise this week if you look at how Kobe and 73/9 was handledJordans will do just fine.
But Nike has to be devastated that Under Armour has Curry and they don't.
they would have adjusted
nike would have made him relevant style wise
*
Nike shytted on UA marketing wise this week if you look at how Kobe and 73/9 was handled

When did this meeting happen?You might be right but according to the article was he just supposed to accept being treated second rate?
You might be right but according to the article was he just supposed to accept being treated second rate?