Yes I can answer it’s a very simple logical answer: the definition of misogyny is simply the hatred of women.can you? The argument you're trying to make here suggests that you can't.
I just schooled you.
No it's notYes I can answer it’s a very simple logical answer: the definition of misogyny is simply the hatred of women.
The man in the video has not demonstrated any hatred of women. You want to check his tweet history or Coli account fine… but that video shows no evidence of misogyny.
You were too afraid to form a rebuttal because you knew you had no answer
You bytch ass nikka
Look at what this broad is wearing and how she's moving. Modern feminism and all these buzz words are just a just a shield for hoeing behaviour and accountability.....
Which is why I am a feminist
What's crazy about that word being so overused is that only 7% of the global population fits the clinical definition of the word so women constantly running into and dating a narcissist is statistically impossible.Yep. Throw "narcissist" in there as another word they use. They are narcissists themselves, but be having the nerve to call us that
You just quoted the definition as: dislike or contempt for women = hatred but on a lesser scale.No it's not
If you want to make semantic arguments, you better be familiar with the discourse. First of, you said misogyny simply means the hatred of woman. That is wrong. Second, I did not just say dislike or contempt for woman, I gave you the definition according to the oxford dictionary, which included prejudice. I followed that up with several explanations from feminist discourse, which clearly fit what is happening in the video. You didn't know what the fukk you were talking about
Examples of feminist discourse - exactly you added that bs to a simple definition that comes from the dictionary. Some of these same feminists would call you a misogynist.If you want to make semantic arguments, you better be familiar with the discourse. First of, you said misogyny simply means the hatred of woman. That is wrong. Second, I did not just say dislike or contempt for woman, I gave you the definition according to the oxford dictionary, which included prejudice. I followed that up with several explanations from feminist discourse, which clearly fit what is happening in the video. You didn't know what the fukk you were talking about
amp.theguardian.com
If you want to make semantic arguments, you better be familiar with the discourse. First of, you said misogyny simply means the hatred of woman. That is wrong. Second, I did not just say dislike or contempt for woman, I gave you the definition according to the oxford dictionary, which included prejudice. I followed that up with several explanations from feminist discourse, which clearly fit what is happening in the video. You didn't know what the fukk you were talking about
Y'all sound like a bunch of cacs arguing something wasn't racistfrom a feminist standpoint
explain to me what happened in that video
Ill wait…
Examples of feminist discourse - exactly you added that bs to a simple definition that comes from the dictionary. Some of these same feminists would call you a misogynist.
We have different words for different purposes Sexism=\ Misogyny.
Sexism contains prejudice, misogyny contains hatred. You call it symantics I call it fit for purpose.
You don’t know what the fukk you’re talking about you’re just spouting feminist babble and using it as a source.
The meaning changed because of feminist babble
Here’s a source
Julia Gillard speech prompts dictionary to change 'misogyny' definition
Australian prime minister's impassioned attack on opposition leader's views of women provokes debate over word's meaning
now you're grasping at straws. The premise of this thread was that the woman in the video were using words from feminist discourse and didn't know what they meant. So if, as I showed, according to feminist discourse, they used the term correctly, the premise of this thread is wrong.
