Yes it would be a huge mess and make the situation worse. But it’s not happening and there is little indication of it happening aside from Trumps bluster.
This is a good thread
Boots Riley is correct , for the most part
Yes it would be a huge mess and make the situation worse. But it’s not happening and there is little indication of it happening aside from Trumps bluster.
This is a good thread


Bernie comes out against Maduro
People are mad at Bernie now
WTF are you even saying?
Theres a coup because Venezuelan's are tired of Maduro and Chavez's legacy of oppression and lack of economic opportunity.
These poeple are using toilet paper as currency.
3 million people have fled the country.
Grow up.
I thought the entire leftist aversion to intervention was about armed force, but in this instance that is not even a serious option. The opposition is peaceful and non-violent, as is the recognition theyve received thus far, and many are still fervently against this outcome. Why?
In the same breath,the same folks who oppose "intervention" in all forms, will tacitly support the intervention of powerful states in other conflicts, on account of their opposition to the United States. See full-scale Russian military intervention in Syria, that many of the people yelling Hands off Venezuela fully celebrated.

Ok, justify killing leaders and destabilizing countries because the leadership is full of bad people (I never repped Maduro, never said he should remain). After Iraq/Libya/Syria I would think the caution about blowback would instill people with caution, that the "opposition" needs to show it has roots in popular support and civil society to be successful. I wouldn't mind sanctions, condemnation, and isolation but this regime change crap needs to get reigned in. But of course this time is different so I am just being alarmist since this whole plan can't go wrong.
I agree with the points about the hypocrisy and though I didn't think the US needed to be in Syria, I never celebrated Assad either. If his own people removed him
The problem with the Syria analogy was that leftists/libertarians supporting Putin's intervention in Syria (which I didn't) and supporting Maduro will fall back on that both are the internationally recognized heads of state (though both due to sham elections). Assad's trump card was he was the "legitimate" president of Syria and could legally ask for foreign assistance. Backing the opposition in Venezuela. even if morally right, isn't exactly the same and some could interpret it (as Sergei Lavrov already has) as regime change.
This is my key issue that some are missing. I don't like Maduro, he is not a hero, in fact I think he is scum. But the problem is that when you remove people like Maduro from the outside, you don't solve the problem, in fact you may make it worse in the destabilized institutions and the blowback from the parts of the population resenting the foreign interference or disenfranchisement under the new regime.
As much as this may piss people off I think the best move the opposition and the other countries could make right now is to promise the military generals amnesty from any prosecution if they align with the new government. They also need to speak to the people voting for Maduro (and yes he has a constituency). Guaido relying on foreign powers to put him in could backfire badly.
Yes, I won’t be surprised if Brazil slips back into dictatorship in a few years. Bolsonaro is power hungry, unpredictable and he already has some of the OGs from the military dictatorship in his cabinet. He pretty much revealed his preference for absolute power when he was running, yet people still voted for him.
I know they’re desperate because of the crime and poverty but come on! Well, they’ve made their bed, now they’ll lie in it. Democracy comes with responsibilities.
Brazilians are very emotional people .... They had 12 years of prosperity during Lulas reign and
yet the 4 year recession under Lima is all they think about.

A multi-year recession is a pretty significant thing weighing on the minds in Brazilians.
Ours lasted less time and we were all losing our shyt. When their govt is even more corrupt than ours, I think it’s fair for them to worry about it.
As for the Syria analogy, it may be imperfect, but you only need to look further south to see how the same leftists/libertarians would respond to an alternate set of facts. In Yemen, the "legitimate" and internationally-recognized President was overthrown by a rebel group, and legally asked for intervention from neighouring Gulf states and from Day 1 they've strongly opposed it. Rightly or wrongly, I think the main predictor of how they form their opinions is what the U.S. policy preference is
As I said, Let the Venezuelan people or the Latin American Union deal with it. If we're that concerned, for the people, then lift sanctions. Help them do better maintenance on their oil infrastructure. Send them food. Send them basic needs (ex: toilet paper).