Venezuela Crisis: Failed coup attempt by Juan Guaido; Military remains supporting Nicholas Maduro

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
64,424
Reputation
19,387
Daps
241,622
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
A Carribbean Norway with mad social programs designed to fight discrimination and inequality plus bad bytches and legalized prostitution and you could own a mansion for the cheap out there? I saw one listed at 22k. 6 bedrooms and 5 bathrooms colonial style. We finna eat good soon brehs

As long as Trump don’t bother them. He’s gotta lose in 2020 or else he might really try to start some shyt. :lupe:
 

ZoeGod

I’m from Brooklyn a place where stars are born.
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
9,173
Reputation
4,610
Daps
52,674
Reppin
Brooklyn,NY
Removing a government is easy. Replacing it and governing is hard. You better have a very good plan post Maduro because it could all go to shyt. From what I have seen there is no detailed planning from anybody other than Maduro must go. We have seen this movie before and in all honestly knowing the various armed factions in the ground in Venezuela once Marduro is gone it would be Colombia in the 80s on steroids. But knowing Trump, Pence, Bolton, Abrams all of which are incompetent they will only plan just to remove Maduro militarily and set up Guaido as president. Anything beyond that they will just sit back. It will be like Libya 2.0. Remove the regime but have no plans for after. Which leaves open to zealous pro Bolivarian elements in the military, colectivos, and national militias wreak havoc in post Maduro. And from the looks of it this is the scenario likely to happen. Trump and co will remove Maduro put in Guaidó and no plan for the aftermath.
 

thatrapsfan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,509
Reputation
1,989
Daps
55,860
Reppin
NULL
@thatrapsfan still don't think a military solution will happen. How does Maduro get unseated

None of the major factors have changed. Wake me up when a regional player expresses interest in supporting an intervention and then I will take it seriously. Unless Colombia or Brazil agree to play a role, this is bluster.


:mjgrin: How do leftys take this seriously?

 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
25,646
Reputation
4,185
Daps
115,806
Reppin
דעת
If RC-135s are flying recon, them drone strikes is on deck...it's already been signed off on.
 

Duppy

Pro
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
445
Reputation
80
Daps
726
Removing a government is easy. Replacing it and governing is hard. You better have a very good plan post Maduro because it could all go to shyt. From what I have seen there is no detailed planning from anybody other than Maduro must go. We have seen this movie before and in all honestly knowing the various armed factions in the ground in Venezuela once Marduro is gone it would be Colombia in the 80s on steroids. But knowing Trump, Pence, Bolton, Abrams all of which are incompetent they will only plan just to remove Maduro militarily and set up Guaido as president. Anything beyond that they will just sit back. It will be like Libya 2.0. Remove the regime but have no plans for after. Which leaves open to zealous pro Bolivarian elements in the military, colectivos, and national militias wreak havoc in post Maduro. And from the looks of it this is the scenario likely to happen. Trump and co will remove Maduro put in Guaidó and no plan for the aftermath.
It's not like there's ever been a grand plan for any regime changes :mjlol:The only plan is to get the guy who is hindering American business interests out of the way and getting someone in that can aid American business interests, none of this shyt has anything to do with any sort of humanitarianism.

In the case of Libya they didn't even manage that I think, the Tobruk government OGs are holding it down for now but then again that too is good, one less anti-imperialist on the way of complete imperial hegemony :wow:
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
79,743
Reputation
9,920
Daps
236,584
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
None of the major factors have changed. Wake me up when a regional player expresses interest in supporting an intervention and then I will take it seriously. Unless Colombia or Brazil agree to play a role, this is bluster.


:mjgrin: How do leftys take this seriously?




Oochie Wally or One Mic?


@FAH1223


:mjlol: I saw Max's report, they are trying too hard. Like, yes you can go to grocery stores in Caracas but people can't afford to buy any of that shid cause the currency is worthless. That's the whole crisis.

Grayzone and their spin is hilarious
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,810
Daps
88,335
Reppin
nWg
:mjlol: I saw Max's report, they are trying too hard. Like, yes you can go to grocery stores in Caracas but people can't afford to buy any of that shid cause the currency is worthless. That's the whole crisis.

Grayzone and their spin is hilarious
And the currency's worthless because an economic hit was put out on the country.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
79,743
Reputation
9,920
Daps
236,584
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
And the currency's worthless because an economic hit was put out on the country.

From 2016. Only sanctions in place were the ones Obama put in 2015 against 7 officials...

How to fix Venezuela

But as Mark Weisbrot — the co-director of the Center for Economic Policy Research, who has written extensively on Venezuela and Latin America — explained to The Week, the main reason for Venezuela's troubles is likely a lot more technocratic, and a lot more banal: Namely, their currency exchange system is a mess.

Venezuela isn't quite as socialist as many people assume. The government does run the country's oil industry, and it gets a bit over half its revenue from international oil sales. But the rest of its revenue comes from taxes, just like in America. The government employs about 20 percent of Venezuela's workforce, which is actually a smaller portion than you see in many major European countries, and is roughly the same as you'd find in France. "It's not Cuba," as Weisbrot put it.

Now, consider Venezuela's currency exchange system, which governs how much Venezuela's currency — the bolívar — trades for against other currencies — most importantly the U.S. dollar. A functional currency exchange system is important because it allows all the various parts of a country's economy to exist in dynamic equilibrium with the flow of goods and services coming in from outside the country; it allows the domestic economy to adapt and rebalance as flows of exports and imports change.

America has a floating exchange rate. The dollar isn't pegged to anything, like another currency or the value of gold. So how much of another currency you get in exchange for a dollar "floats" up and down all the time, reacting to countless forces in the market.

Venezuela's system, by contrast, is a dysfunctional mess. The country's official exchange rate is pegged to the dollar — specifically, it's 10 bolívares for $1. So no matter what happens, whenever the government does business with anyone, it gets or gives 10 bolívares for every $1.

But there's also an enormous black market currency exchange. This is where the hyperinflation is coming from: The number of bolívares you can get for $1 on the black market has rocketed up to well over 1,000, and may go considerably higher.

This causes no end of problems. The black market inflation raises the price of imports for basic goods, which drives the government to clamp down with rationing and price controls, which causes shortages, which drives more people into the black market, which drives the black market exchange rate ever higher and feeds further inflation. It leads to rampant theft and corruption, because if you can get your hands on U.S. dollars you can make a killing in bolívares. It causes people to engage in all sorts of economically irrational behavior, like stockpiling dollars for their own sake because they're the only stable store of value; or taking real goods and commodities out of Venezuela to sell them elsewhere for U.S. dollars, so they can return to Venezuela with those dollars and make a killing.

For the government, the situation creates a needless fiscal deficit. The government sells oil on the international market and generally gets U.S. dollars in exchange, and then it sells those U.S. dollars to people in Venezuela, since Venezuela's economy relies heavily on imports denominated in U.S. dollars for so many everyday goods. But of course, the government only gets 10 bolívares back for each $1. Which isn't enough to balance its finances.

Fixing Venezuela's problems — or at least the crucial first step — is thus relatively straightforward, Weisbrot argues: Unify the exchange system into one floating rate that everyone, including the government, uses. This would allow the government to get its fiscal house in order, and give Venezuelans a stable place to go to trade in the country's own currency.

Because of the rampant dysfunction and currency speculation in the black market, it's hard to know the "real" market value of the bolívar. But Weisbrot figures Venezuela's currency would stabilize around a few hundred bolívares for every dollar.

Once that's done, Venezuela would need to put a system of cash aid in place so its citizens can afford to buy basic necessities like food. And it would need to eliminate the rationing and price control regulations, which really do play havoc with the market.

Finally, Venezuela's government should invest in new and different industries that would allow the country to diversify away from oil. There's no reason for Venezuela to rely so heavily on imports for food — it got 24 percent of its food from abroad in 2011, the last year for which data is available — and relying on imports for basic necessities has of course interacted horribly with the currency system's problems.

Unfortunately, moving to a unified floating exchange system is unpopularwith the Venezuelan public, precisely because it would involve a one-time but very big drop in the official value of the bolívar against the dollar.

Still, it's worth remembering that Venezuela's problems are not really what either the country's own president or his American critics would have you believe.
 
Top